Dismantling motivational interviewing: Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment.

Jon Morgenstern, Alexis Kuerbis, Jessica Houser, Svetlana Levak, Paul Amrhein, Sijing Shao, James R. McKay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is an efficacious treatment for alcohol use disorders. MI is thought to enhance motivation via a combination of 2 therapeutic strategies or active ingredients: 1 relational and 1 directional. The primary aim of this study was to examine MI's hypothesized active ingredients using a dismantling design. Problem drinkers (N = 139) seeking treatment were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: MI, relational MI without the directional elements labeled spirit-only MI (SOMI), or a nontherapy control condition and followed for 8 weeks. Those assigned to MI or SOMI received 4 sessions of treatment over 8 weeks. All participants significantly reduced their drinking by Week 8, but reductions were equivalent across conditions. The hypothesis that baseline motivation would significantly moderate condition effects on outcome was generally not supported. Failure to find support for MI's hypothesized active ingredients is discussed in the context of the strengths and limitations of the study design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-762
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology of Addictive Behaviors
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Motivational Interviewing
Motivation
Drinking
Alcohols

Keywords

  • Motivational interviewing
  • active ingredients
  • drinking
  • moderated drinking
  • readiness to change

Cite this

Morgenstern, Jon ; Kuerbis, Alexis ; Houser, Jessica ; Levak, Svetlana ; Amrhein, Paul ; Shao, Sijing ; McKay, James R. / Dismantling motivational interviewing : Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment. In: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 751-762.
@article{398eb3c74b934119b41924ce7172e001,
title = "Dismantling motivational interviewing: Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment.",
abstract = "Motivational interviewing (MI) is an efficacious treatment for alcohol use disorders. MI is thought to enhance motivation via a combination of 2 therapeutic strategies or active ingredients: 1 relational and 1 directional. The primary aim of this study was to examine MI's hypothesized active ingredients using a dismantling design. Problem drinkers (N = 139) seeking treatment were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: MI, relational MI without the directional elements labeled spirit-only MI (SOMI), or a nontherapy control condition and followed for 8 weeks. Those assigned to MI or SOMI received 4 sessions of treatment over 8 weeks. All participants significantly reduced their drinking by Week 8, but reductions were equivalent across conditions. The hypothesis that baseline motivation would significantly moderate condition effects on outcome was generally not supported. Failure to find support for MI's hypothesized active ingredients is discussed in the context of the strengths and limitations of the study design.",
keywords = "Motivational interviewing, active ingredients, drinking, moderated drinking, readiness to change",
author = "Jon Morgenstern and Alexis Kuerbis and Jessica Houser and Svetlana Levak and Paul Amrhein and Sijing Shao and McKay, {James R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/adb0000317",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "751--762",
journal = "Psychology of Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0893-164X",
publisher = "Educational Publishing Foundation",
number = "7",

}

Dismantling motivational interviewing : Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment. / Morgenstern, Jon; Kuerbis, Alexis; Houser, Jessica; Levak, Svetlana; Amrhein, Paul; Shao, Sijing; McKay, James R.

In: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.11.2017, p. 751-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dismantling motivational interviewing

T2 - Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment.

AU - Morgenstern, Jon

AU - Kuerbis, Alexis

AU - Houser, Jessica

AU - Levak, Svetlana

AU - Amrhein, Paul

AU - Shao, Sijing

AU - McKay, James R.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Motivational interviewing (MI) is an efficacious treatment for alcohol use disorders. MI is thought to enhance motivation via a combination of 2 therapeutic strategies or active ingredients: 1 relational and 1 directional. The primary aim of this study was to examine MI's hypothesized active ingredients using a dismantling design. Problem drinkers (N = 139) seeking treatment were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: MI, relational MI without the directional elements labeled spirit-only MI (SOMI), or a nontherapy control condition and followed for 8 weeks. Those assigned to MI or SOMI received 4 sessions of treatment over 8 weeks. All participants significantly reduced their drinking by Week 8, but reductions were equivalent across conditions. The hypothesis that baseline motivation would significantly moderate condition effects on outcome was generally not supported. Failure to find support for MI's hypothesized active ingredients is discussed in the context of the strengths and limitations of the study design.

AB - Motivational interviewing (MI) is an efficacious treatment for alcohol use disorders. MI is thought to enhance motivation via a combination of 2 therapeutic strategies or active ingredients: 1 relational and 1 directional. The primary aim of this study was to examine MI's hypothesized active ingredients using a dismantling design. Problem drinkers (N = 139) seeking treatment were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: MI, relational MI without the directional elements labeled spirit-only MI (SOMI), or a nontherapy control condition and followed for 8 weeks. Those assigned to MI or SOMI received 4 sessions of treatment over 8 weeks. All participants significantly reduced their drinking by Week 8, but reductions were equivalent across conditions. The hypothesis that baseline motivation would significantly moderate condition effects on outcome was generally not supported. Failure to find support for MI's hypothesized active ingredients is discussed in the context of the strengths and limitations of the study design.

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - active ingredients

KW - drinking

KW - moderated drinking

KW - readiness to change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030102662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/adb0000317

DO - 10.1037/adb0000317

M3 - Article

C2 - 28956934

AN - SCOPUS:85030102662

VL - 31

SP - 751

EP - 762

JO - Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

JF - Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0893-164X

IS - 7

ER -