Disputed paraphilia diagnoses and legal decision making: A case law survey of paraphilia NOS, nonconsent

Christopher King, Lindsey E. Wylie, Eve M. Brank, Kirk Heilbrun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Paraphilia diagnoses applied in forensic settings are an ongoing subject of debate among psycholegal professionals and scholars. Disagreements pertain to both means-related issues having to do with issues of diagnostic reliability and validity, and ends-related issues regarding the consequences inherent to the legal contexts in which the diagnoses arise. To provide a fresh outlook on some of the issues, the present study entailed a systematic survey of U.S. case law to investigate the history, extent, and nature of forensic uses of a controversial paraphilia diagnosis, paraphilia not otherwise specified, nonconsent. Descriptive analyses revealed that use of the diagnosis, which occurred almost exclusively in adult sexually violent predator cases, increased substantially over the past decade, with cases in 3 states accounting for over 2/3 of the total observed prevalence rate. In the majority of cases examined in detail, the support that evaluators relied upon in making the diagnosis was either not clearly described or behaviorally inferential in nature, and the diagnosis was often accompanied by other mental and personality disorder diagnoses. An opposing expert was observed in more than half of the cases, approximately 1/3 of whom noted the debate surrounding the diagnosis and nearly 2/3 of whom opined that there was insufficient evidentiary support for the diagnosis in the case at bar. Finally, all courts that reached the issue of the admissibility of the diagnosis between 2008 and 2011 admitted it, and most courts also found it sufficient to support classifying an individual as a sexually violent predator.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-308
Number of pages15
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Paraphilic Disorders
case law
Decision Making
decision making
Surveys and Questionnaires
personality disorder
Personality Disorders
mental disorder
Reproducibility of Results
Mental Disorders
diagnostic

Keywords

  • Admissibility and sufficiency of evidence
  • Forensic evaluation
  • NOS
  • Paraphilia not otherwise specified nonconsent
  • Sexually violent predator

Cite this

@article{b84826010f214e8eb1c7803d9a12ed11,
title = "Disputed paraphilia diagnoses and legal decision making: A case law survey of paraphilia NOS, nonconsent",
abstract = "Paraphilia diagnoses applied in forensic settings are an ongoing subject of debate among psycholegal professionals and scholars. Disagreements pertain to both means-related issues having to do with issues of diagnostic reliability and validity, and ends-related issues regarding the consequences inherent to the legal contexts in which the diagnoses arise. To provide a fresh outlook on some of the issues, the present study entailed a systematic survey of U.S. case law to investigate the history, extent, and nature of forensic uses of a controversial paraphilia diagnosis, paraphilia not otherwise specified, nonconsent. Descriptive analyses revealed that use of the diagnosis, which occurred almost exclusively in adult sexually violent predator cases, increased substantially over the past decade, with cases in 3 states accounting for over 2/3 of the total observed prevalence rate. In the majority of cases examined in detail, the support that evaluators relied upon in making the diagnosis was either not clearly described or behaviorally inferential in nature, and the diagnosis was often accompanied by other mental and personality disorder diagnoses. An opposing expert was observed in more than half of the cases, approximately 1/3 of whom noted the debate surrounding the diagnosis and nearly 2/3 of whom opined that there was insufficient evidentiary support for the diagnosis in the case at bar. Finally, all courts that reached the issue of the admissibility of the diagnosis between 2008 and 2011 admitted it, and most courts also found it sufficient to support classifying an individual as a sexually violent predator.",
keywords = "Admissibility and sufficiency of evidence, Forensic evaluation, NOS, Paraphilia not otherwise specified nonconsent, Sexually violent predator",
author = "Christopher King and Wylie, {Lindsey E.} and Brank, {Eve M.} and Kirk Heilbrun",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000018",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "294--308",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Disputed paraphilia diagnoses and legal decision making : A case law survey of paraphilia NOS, nonconsent. / King, Christopher; Wylie, Lindsey E.; Brank, Eve M.; Heilbrun, Kirk.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 294-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disputed paraphilia diagnoses and legal decision making

T2 - A case law survey of paraphilia NOS, nonconsent

AU - King, Christopher

AU - Wylie, Lindsey E.

AU - Brank, Eve M.

AU - Heilbrun, Kirk

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Paraphilia diagnoses applied in forensic settings are an ongoing subject of debate among psycholegal professionals and scholars. Disagreements pertain to both means-related issues having to do with issues of diagnostic reliability and validity, and ends-related issues regarding the consequences inherent to the legal contexts in which the diagnoses arise. To provide a fresh outlook on some of the issues, the present study entailed a systematic survey of U.S. case law to investigate the history, extent, and nature of forensic uses of a controversial paraphilia diagnosis, paraphilia not otherwise specified, nonconsent. Descriptive analyses revealed that use of the diagnosis, which occurred almost exclusively in adult sexually violent predator cases, increased substantially over the past decade, with cases in 3 states accounting for over 2/3 of the total observed prevalence rate. In the majority of cases examined in detail, the support that evaluators relied upon in making the diagnosis was either not clearly described or behaviorally inferential in nature, and the diagnosis was often accompanied by other mental and personality disorder diagnoses. An opposing expert was observed in more than half of the cases, approximately 1/3 of whom noted the debate surrounding the diagnosis and nearly 2/3 of whom opined that there was insufficient evidentiary support for the diagnosis in the case at bar. Finally, all courts that reached the issue of the admissibility of the diagnosis between 2008 and 2011 admitted it, and most courts also found it sufficient to support classifying an individual as a sexually violent predator.

AB - Paraphilia diagnoses applied in forensic settings are an ongoing subject of debate among psycholegal professionals and scholars. Disagreements pertain to both means-related issues having to do with issues of diagnostic reliability and validity, and ends-related issues regarding the consequences inherent to the legal contexts in which the diagnoses arise. To provide a fresh outlook on some of the issues, the present study entailed a systematic survey of U.S. case law to investigate the history, extent, and nature of forensic uses of a controversial paraphilia diagnosis, paraphilia not otherwise specified, nonconsent. Descriptive analyses revealed that use of the diagnosis, which occurred almost exclusively in adult sexually violent predator cases, increased substantially over the past decade, with cases in 3 states accounting for over 2/3 of the total observed prevalence rate. In the majority of cases examined in detail, the support that evaluators relied upon in making the diagnosis was either not clearly described or behaviorally inferential in nature, and the diagnosis was often accompanied by other mental and personality disorder diagnoses. An opposing expert was observed in more than half of the cases, approximately 1/3 of whom noted the debate surrounding the diagnosis and nearly 2/3 of whom opined that there was insufficient evidentiary support for the diagnosis in the case at bar. Finally, all courts that reached the issue of the admissibility of the diagnosis between 2008 and 2011 admitted it, and most courts also found it sufficient to support classifying an individual as a sexually violent predator.

KW - Admissibility and sufficiency of evidence

KW - Forensic evaluation

KW - NOS

KW - Paraphilia not otherwise specified nonconsent

KW - Sexually violent predator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905171939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000018

DO - 10.1037/law0000018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905171939

VL - 20

SP - 294

EP - 308

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 3

ER -