Distributive justice in the household: A comparison of alternative theoretical models

Constance Gager, Bryndl Hohmann-Marriott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyze the theoretical basis on which wives and husbands evaluate the fairness of the division of household labor. Using distributive justice theory, we argue that evaluations are based on beliefs about equality and equity rules and social comparisons. We developed a number of formal models to account for evaluations of housework fairness and compare these with data from the 1987 National Survey of Families and Households. We find that husbands' evaluations of fairness of the division of household labor are based on more traditional gender-based division of labor as their comparisons tend to be based on comparisons to other men's participation in housework. In contrast, wives' evaluations are based on both gender role norms and the justice principle of marital equality, as they tend to be based on comparisons between their spouse and themselves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-42
Number of pages38
JournalMarriage and Family Review
Volume40
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Dec 2006

Fingerprint

distributive justice
fairness
housework
evaluation
husband
wife
equality
labor
division of labor
gender role
spouse
equity
justice
participation
gender

Keywords

  • Distributive justice
  • Division of labor
  • Fairness
  • Housework

Cite this

@article{c734642ab75148d78397f4e627076e00,
title = "Distributive justice in the household: A comparison of alternative theoretical models",
abstract = "We analyze the theoretical basis on which wives and husbands evaluate the fairness of the division of household labor. Using distributive justice theory, we argue that evaluations are based on beliefs about equality and equity rules and social comparisons. We developed a number of formal models to account for evaluations of housework fairness and compare these with data from the 1987 National Survey of Families and Households. We find that husbands' evaluations of fairness of the division of household labor are based on more traditional gender-based division of labor as their comparisons tend to be based on comparisons to other men's participation in housework. In contrast, wives' evaluations are based on both gender role norms and the justice principle of marital equality, as they tend to be based on comparisons between their spouse and themselves.",
keywords = "Distributive justice, Division of labor, Fairness, Housework",
author = "Constance Gager and Bryndl Hohmann-Marriott",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1300/J002v40n02_02",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "5--42",
journal = "Marriage and Family Review",
issn = "0149-4929",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

Distributive justice in the household : A comparison of alternative theoretical models. / Gager, Constance; Hohmann-Marriott, Bryndl.

In: Marriage and Family Review, Vol. 40, No. 2-3, 07.12.2006, p. 5-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distributive justice in the household

T2 - A comparison of alternative theoretical models

AU - Gager, Constance

AU - Hohmann-Marriott, Bryndl

PY - 2006/12/7

Y1 - 2006/12/7

N2 - We analyze the theoretical basis on which wives and husbands evaluate the fairness of the division of household labor. Using distributive justice theory, we argue that evaluations are based on beliefs about equality and equity rules and social comparisons. We developed a number of formal models to account for evaluations of housework fairness and compare these with data from the 1987 National Survey of Families and Households. We find that husbands' evaluations of fairness of the division of household labor are based on more traditional gender-based division of labor as their comparisons tend to be based on comparisons to other men's participation in housework. In contrast, wives' evaluations are based on both gender role norms and the justice principle of marital equality, as they tend to be based on comparisons between their spouse and themselves.

AB - We analyze the theoretical basis on which wives and husbands evaluate the fairness of the division of household labor. Using distributive justice theory, we argue that evaluations are based on beliefs about equality and equity rules and social comparisons. We developed a number of formal models to account for evaluations of housework fairness and compare these with data from the 1987 National Survey of Families and Households. We find that husbands' evaluations of fairness of the division of household labor are based on more traditional gender-based division of labor as their comparisons tend to be based on comparisons to other men's participation in housework. In contrast, wives' evaluations are based on both gender role norms and the justice principle of marital equality, as they tend to be based on comparisons between their spouse and themselves.

KW - Distributive justice

KW - Division of labor

KW - Fairness

KW - Housework

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845732231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J002v40n02_02

DO - 10.1300/J002v40n02_02

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845732231

VL - 40

SP - 5

EP - 42

JO - Marriage and Family Review

JF - Marriage and Family Review

SN - 0149-4929

IS - 2-3

ER -