Do you see what i see? An investigation of the aesthetic experience in the laboratory and museum

Eva Specker, Pablo Tinio, Michiel van Elk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higherorder information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-275
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Museums
Art
Esthetics
Aesthetic Experience
Research

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Art education
  • Creativity
  • Museums
  • Psychology of art

Cite this

@article{051dd81f034e4be7b0c45b48e6e252b6,
title = "Do you see what i see? An investigation of the aesthetic experience in the laboratory and museum",
abstract = "Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higherorder information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Art education, Creativity, Museums, Psychology of art",
author = "Eva Specker and Pablo Tinio and {van Elk}, Michiel",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/aca0000107",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "265--275",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Do you see what i see? An investigation of the aesthetic experience in the laboratory and museum. / Specker, Eva; Tinio, Pablo; van Elk, Michiel.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.08.2017, p. 265-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do you see what i see? An investigation of the aesthetic experience in the laboratory and museum

AU - Specker, Eva

AU - Tinio, Pablo

AU - van Elk, Michiel

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higherorder information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.

AB - Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higherorder information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Art education

KW - Creativity

KW - Museums

KW - Psychology of art

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026786272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/aca0000107

DO - 10.1037/aca0000107

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 265

EP - 275

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 3

ER -