Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India

A Sector Level Analysis

Chandana Chakraborty, Peter Nunnenkamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Booming foreign direct investment (FDI) in post-reform India is widely believed to promote economic growth. We assess this proposition by subjecting industry-specific FDI and output data to Granger causality tests within a panel cointegration framework. It turns out that the growth effects of FDI vary widely across sectors. FDI stocks and output are mutually reinforcing in the manufacturing sector, whereas any causal relationship is absent in the primary sector. Most strikingly, we find only transitory effects of FDI on output in the services sector. However, FDI in the services sector appears to have promoted growth in the manufacturing sector through cross-sector spillovers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1192-1212
Number of pages21
JournalWorld Development
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2008

Fingerprint

foreign direct investment
economic reform
direct investment
foreign investment
economic growth
India
service sector
manufacturing sector
tertiary sector
manufacturing
primary sector
Granger causality test
causality
analysis
Economic reform
Economic growth
Foreign direct investment
reform
industry

Keywords

  • causality
  • cointegration
  • economic reform
  • foreign direct investment
  • growth effects
  • India

Cite this

@article{1ba9ce373929473bbf7201eb0bd50e7e,
title = "Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India: A Sector Level Analysis",
abstract = "Booming foreign direct investment (FDI) in post-reform India is widely believed to promote economic growth. We assess this proposition by subjecting industry-specific FDI and output data to Granger causality tests within a panel cointegration framework. It turns out that the growth effects of FDI vary widely across sectors. FDI stocks and output are mutually reinforcing in the manufacturing sector, whereas any causal relationship is absent in the primary sector. Most strikingly, we find only transitory effects of FDI on output in the services sector. However, FDI in the services sector appears to have promoted growth in the manufacturing sector through cross-sector spillovers.",
keywords = "causality, cointegration, economic reform, foreign direct investment, growth effects, India",
author = "Chandana Chakraborty and Peter Nunnenkamp",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.014",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1192--1212",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "0305-750X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India : A Sector Level Analysis. / Chakraborty, Chandana; Nunnenkamp, Peter.

In: World Development, Vol. 36, No. 7, 01.07.2008, p. 1192-1212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India

T2 - A Sector Level Analysis

AU - Chakraborty, Chandana

AU - Nunnenkamp, Peter

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Booming foreign direct investment (FDI) in post-reform India is widely believed to promote economic growth. We assess this proposition by subjecting industry-specific FDI and output data to Granger causality tests within a panel cointegration framework. It turns out that the growth effects of FDI vary widely across sectors. FDI stocks and output are mutually reinforcing in the manufacturing sector, whereas any causal relationship is absent in the primary sector. Most strikingly, we find only transitory effects of FDI on output in the services sector. However, FDI in the services sector appears to have promoted growth in the manufacturing sector through cross-sector spillovers.

AB - Booming foreign direct investment (FDI) in post-reform India is widely believed to promote economic growth. We assess this proposition by subjecting industry-specific FDI and output data to Granger causality tests within a panel cointegration framework. It turns out that the growth effects of FDI vary widely across sectors. FDI stocks and output are mutually reinforcing in the manufacturing sector, whereas any causal relationship is absent in the primary sector. Most strikingly, we find only transitory effects of FDI on output in the services sector. However, FDI in the services sector appears to have promoted growth in the manufacturing sector through cross-sector spillovers.

KW - causality

KW - cointegration

KW - economic reform

KW - foreign direct investment

KW - growth effects

KW - India

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44549086275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.014

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.014

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1192

EP - 1212

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 0305-750X

IS - 7

ER -