Effect of postural control position and blood- sampling arm position on change in plasma volume from supine rest through a cycling bout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine any interaction between a postural control period and bloodsampling arm position on change in plasma volume (ΔPV) from supine rest through a bout of cycling. The subjects underwent two different testing protocols. During the control test, each subject lay supine and then sat upright, each for 30 min before cycling for 20 min at ~70% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HR max). During the non-control test, each subject cycled immediately after 30 min of supine rest. During seated rest and exercise, one arm was supported at heart level (Horizontal), the other was in a position typically used in cycling (Pendent). A multifactorial ANOVA was performed to identify any interaction between the independent variables on ΔPV. There was no interaction between the test protocol and the arm position (F 1,9 = 0.005, P = 0.947, η p 2 = 0.001) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.2 ± 6.5, -13.6 ± 6.7, -10.7 ± 6.8, and -12.3 ± 4.2 % for the control Horizontal, control Pendent, non-control Horizontal, and non-control Pendent arm, respectively. There was no main effect of test protocol (F 1,9 = 0.738, P = 0.413, η p 2 = 0.076) or arm position (F 1,9 = 1.692, P = 0.226, η p 2 = 0.158) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.9 ± 6.4 and -11.5 ± 5.5 % for the control versus noncontrol test, and -11.4 ± 6.5 and -13.0 ± 5.5 % for the Horizontal and Pendent arm position, respectively. Thus, neither the postural control period nor the arm position affected ΔPV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-81
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
Volume21
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Plasma Volume
Analysis of Variance
Heart Rate

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Fluid shifts
  • Hematocrit
  • Hemoglobin

Cite this

@article{3b856776278b4468b33e9e4220c4ed70,
title = "Effect of postural control position and blood- sampling arm position on change in plasma volume from supine rest through a cycling bout",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to determine any interaction between a postural control period and bloodsampling arm position on change in plasma volume (ΔPV) from supine rest through a bout of cycling. The subjects underwent two different testing protocols. During the control test, each subject lay supine and then sat upright, each for 30 min before cycling for 20 min at ~70{\%} of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HR max). During the non-control test, each subject cycled immediately after 30 min of supine rest. During seated rest and exercise, one arm was supported at heart level (Horizontal), the other was in a position typically used in cycling (Pendent). A multifactorial ANOVA was performed to identify any interaction between the independent variables on ΔPV. There was no interaction between the test protocol and the arm position (F 1,9 = 0.005, P = 0.947, η p 2 = 0.001) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.2 ± 6.5, -13.6 ± 6.7, -10.7 ± 6.8, and -12.3 ± 4.2 {\%} for the control Horizontal, control Pendent, non-control Horizontal, and non-control Pendent arm, respectively. There was no main effect of test protocol (F 1,9 = 0.738, P = 0.413, η p 2 = 0.076) or arm position (F 1,9 = 1.692, P = 0.226, η p 2 = 0.158) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.9 ± 6.4 and -11.5 ± 5.5 {\%} for the control versus noncontrol test, and -11.4 ± 6.5 and -13.0 ± 5.5 {\%} for the Horizontal and Pendent arm position, respectively. Thus, neither the postural control period nor the arm position affected ΔPV.",
keywords = "Exercise, Fluid shifts, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin",
author = "William Sullivan and Michele Fisher",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "68--81",
journal = "Journal of Exercise Physiology Online",
issn = "1097-9751",
publisher = "American Society of Exercise Physiologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of postural control position and blood- sampling arm position on change in plasma volume from supine rest through a cycling bout

AU - Sullivan, William

AU - Fisher, Michele

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to determine any interaction between a postural control period and bloodsampling arm position on change in plasma volume (ΔPV) from supine rest through a bout of cycling. The subjects underwent two different testing protocols. During the control test, each subject lay supine and then sat upright, each for 30 min before cycling for 20 min at ~70% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HR max). During the non-control test, each subject cycled immediately after 30 min of supine rest. During seated rest and exercise, one arm was supported at heart level (Horizontal), the other was in a position typically used in cycling (Pendent). A multifactorial ANOVA was performed to identify any interaction between the independent variables on ΔPV. There was no interaction between the test protocol and the arm position (F 1,9 = 0.005, P = 0.947, η p 2 = 0.001) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.2 ± 6.5, -13.6 ± 6.7, -10.7 ± 6.8, and -12.3 ± 4.2 % for the control Horizontal, control Pendent, non-control Horizontal, and non-control Pendent arm, respectively. There was no main effect of test protocol (F 1,9 = 0.738, P = 0.413, η p 2 = 0.076) or arm position (F 1,9 = 1.692, P = 0.226, η p 2 = 0.158) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.9 ± 6.4 and -11.5 ± 5.5 % for the control versus noncontrol test, and -11.4 ± 6.5 and -13.0 ± 5.5 % for the Horizontal and Pendent arm position, respectively. Thus, neither the postural control period nor the arm position affected ΔPV.

AB - The objective of this study was to determine any interaction between a postural control period and bloodsampling arm position on change in plasma volume (ΔPV) from supine rest through a bout of cycling. The subjects underwent two different testing protocols. During the control test, each subject lay supine and then sat upright, each for 30 min before cycling for 20 min at ~70% of age-predicted maximal heart rate (HR max). During the non-control test, each subject cycled immediately after 30 min of supine rest. During seated rest and exercise, one arm was supported at heart level (Horizontal), the other was in a position typically used in cycling (Pendent). A multifactorial ANOVA was performed to identify any interaction between the independent variables on ΔPV. There was no interaction between the test protocol and the arm position (F 1,9 = 0.005, P = 0.947, η p 2 = 0.001) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.2 ± 6.5, -13.6 ± 6.7, -10.7 ± 6.8, and -12.3 ± 4.2 % for the control Horizontal, control Pendent, non-control Horizontal, and non-control Pendent arm, respectively. There was no main effect of test protocol (F 1,9 = 0.738, P = 0.413, η p 2 = 0.076) or arm position (F 1,9 = 1.692, P = 0.226, η p 2 = 0.158) on ΔPV from supine rest through exercise. Mean ΔPV was -12.9 ± 6.4 and -11.5 ± 5.5 % for the control versus noncontrol test, and -11.4 ± 6.5 and -13.0 ± 5.5 % for the Horizontal and Pendent arm position, respectively. Thus, neither the postural control period nor the arm position affected ΔPV.

KW - Exercise

KW - Fluid shifts

KW - Hematocrit

KW - Hemoglobin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063027103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 68

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

JF - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

SN - 1097-9751

IS - 6

ER -