Effect of the Visual Presentation of a Craniofacial Syndrome on Speech Intelligibility in Noise

Tim Bressmann, Tamara Eick, Jennifer Pardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Research has argued that a speaker’s facial appearance can result in an “intelligibility cost” for the listener. The study investigated whether such an intelligibility cost exists for a visible repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry. Setting: University department. Participants: Eight typical speakers provided speech samples. Twenty-eight naive listeners participated in a speech in noise experiment. Interventions: Listeners transcribed sentences in noise that were paired with faces of individuals with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. They also rated speaker intelligibility and answered a questionnaire about their previous knowledge about cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of words transcribed correctly and intelligibility ratings, compared by experimental condition (photo of typical face or face with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry) and speaker gender. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between speech stimuli that were presented with faces with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. The percentage of words transcribed correctly by the listeners was lower for female speakers (F = 12.7, df = 1; P <.01). Speech intelligibility of female speakers was rated more poorly (F = 10.5, df = 1; P <.01). Conclusions: Presence of a repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry did not result in an intelligibility cost for naive listeners. Future research should investigate possible effects of facial motion or previous knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1038-1043
Number of pages6
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Volume56
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Speech Intelligibility
Cleft Lip
Noise
Nose
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cleft Palate
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

Keywords

  • Speech perception
  • esthetics
  • facial morphology
  • nonsyndromic clefting
  • psychosocial adjustment
  • scarring
  • social support

Cite this

@article{56a4cda3b3974a1498f27846c96afd67,
title = "Effect of the Visual Presentation of a Craniofacial Syndrome on Speech Intelligibility in Noise",
abstract = "Objective: Research has argued that a speaker’s facial appearance can result in an “intelligibility cost” for the listener. The study investigated whether such an intelligibility cost exists for a visible repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry. Setting: University department. Participants: Eight typical speakers provided speech samples. Twenty-eight naive listeners participated in a speech in noise experiment. Interventions: Listeners transcribed sentences in noise that were paired with faces of individuals with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. They also rated speaker intelligibility and answered a questionnaire about their previous knowledge about cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of words transcribed correctly and intelligibility ratings, compared by experimental condition (photo of typical face or face with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry) and speaker gender. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between speech stimuli that were presented with faces with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. The percentage of words transcribed correctly by the listeners was lower for female speakers (F = 12.7, df = 1; P <.01). Speech intelligibility of female speakers was rated more poorly (F = 10.5, df = 1; P <.01). Conclusions: Presence of a repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry did not result in an intelligibility cost for naive listeners. Future research should investigate possible effects of facial motion or previous knowledge.",
keywords = "Speech perception, esthetics, facial morphology, nonsyndromic clefting, psychosocial adjustment, scarring, social support",
author = "Tim Bressmann and Tamara Eick and Jennifer Pardo",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1055665618825403",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1038--1043",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
number = "8",

}

Effect of the Visual Presentation of a Craniofacial Syndrome on Speech Intelligibility in Noise. / Bressmann, Tim; Eick, Tamara; Pardo, Jennifer.

In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 56, No. 8, 01.09.2019, p. 1038-1043.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of the Visual Presentation of a Craniofacial Syndrome on Speech Intelligibility in Noise

AU - Bressmann, Tim

AU - Eick, Tamara

AU - Pardo, Jennifer

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objective: Research has argued that a speaker’s facial appearance can result in an “intelligibility cost” for the listener. The study investigated whether such an intelligibility cost exists for a visible repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry. Setting: University department. Participants: Eight typical speakers provided speech samples. Twenty-eight naive listeners participated in a speech in noise experiment. Interventions: Listeners transcribed sentences in noise that were paired with faces of individuals with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. They also rated speaker intelligibility and answered a questionnaire about their previous knowledge about cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of words transcribed correctly and intelligibility ratings, compared by experimental condition (photo of typical face or face with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry) and speaker gender. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between speech stimuli that were presented with faces with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. The percentage of words transcribed correctly by the listeners was lower for female speakers (F = 12.7, df = 1; P <.01). Speech intelligibility of female speakers was rated more poorly (F = 10.5, df = 1; P <.01). Conclusions: Presence of a repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry did not result in an intelligibility cost for naive listeners. Future research should investigate possible effects of facial motion or previous knowledge.

AB - Objective: Research has argued that a speaker’s facial appearance can result in an “intelligibility cost” for the listener. The study investigated whether such an intelligibility cost exists for a visible repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry. Setting: University department. Participants: Eight typical speakers provided speech samples. Twenty-eight naive listeners participated in a speech in noise experiment. Interventions: Listeners transcribed sentences in noise that were paired with faces of individuals with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. They also rated speaker intelligibility and answered a questionnaire about their previous knowledge about cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of words transcribed correctly and intelligibility ratings, compared by experimental condition (photo of typical face or face with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry) and speaker gender. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between speech stimuli that were presented with faces with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. The percentage of words transcribed correctly by the listeners was lower for female speakers (F = 12.7, df = 1; P <.01). Speech intelligibility of female speakers was rated more poorly (F = 10.5, df = 1; P <.01). Conclusions: Presence of a repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry did not result in an intelligibility cost for naive listeners. Future research should investigate possible effects of facial motion or previous knowledge.

KW - Speech perception

KW - esthetics

KW - facial morphology

KW - nonsyndromic clefting

KW - psychosocial adjustment

KW - scarring

KW - social support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071050179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1055665618825403

DO - 10.1177/1055665618825403

M3 - Article

C2 - 30669867

AN - SCOPUS:85071050179

VL - 56

SP - 1038

EP - 1043

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 8

ER -