Effects of Interviewer Familiarity and Supportiveness on Children's Recall Across Repeated Interviews

Sonja P. Brubacher, Debra A. Poole, Jason Dickinson, David La Rooy, Zsófia A. Szojka, Martine B. Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLaw and human behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Interviews
interview
Recognition (Psychology)
Familiarity
Transgression

Keywords

  • Children
  • Free recall
  • Interviewer familiarity
  • Interviewer support
  • Repeated interviewing

Cite this

Brubacher, Sonja P. ; Poole, Debra A. ; Dickinson, Jason ; Rooy, David La ; Szojka, Zsófia A. ; Powell, Martine B. / Effects of Interviewer Familiarity and Supportiveness on Children's Recall Across Repeated Interviews. In: Law and human behavior. 2019.
@article{497b6b0284b34750b0f8694466048c15,
title = "Effects of Interviewer Familiarity and Supportiveness on Children's Recall Across Repeated Interviews",
abstract = "Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.",
keywords = "Children, Free recall, Interviewer familiarity, Interviewer support, Repeated interviewing",
author = "Brubacher, {Sonja P.} and Poole, {Debra A.} and Jason Dickinson and Rooy, {David La} and Szojka, {Zs{\'o}fia A.} and Powell, {Martine B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/lhb0000346",
language = "English",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

Effects of Interviewer Familiarity and Supportiveness on Children's Recall Across Repeated Interviews. / Brubacher, Sonja P.; Poole, Debra A.; Dickinson, Jason; Rooy, David La; Szojka, Zsófia A.; Powell, Martine B.

In: Law and human behavior, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Interviewer Familiarity and Supportiveness on Children's Recall Across Repeated Interviews

AU - Brubacher, Sonja P.

AU - Poole, Debra A.

AU - Dickinson, Jason

AU - Rooy, David La

AU - Szojka, Zsófia A.

AU - Powell, Martine B.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.

AB - Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.

KW - Children

KW - Free recall

KW - Interviewer familiarity

KW - Interviewer support

KW - Repeated interviewing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071628338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/lhb0000346

DO - 10.1037/lhb0000346

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071628338

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

ER -