Abstract
Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 507-516 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Law and human behavior |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Children
- Free recall
- Interviewer familiarity
- Interviewer support
- Repeated interviewing
Cite this
}
Effects of interviewer familiarity and supportiveness on children's recall across repeated interviews. / Brubacher, Sonja P.; Poole, Debra A.; Dickinson, Jason; Rooy, David La; Szojka, Zsófia A.; Powell, Martine B.
In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 43, No. 6, 12.2019, p. 507-516.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of interviewer familiarity and supportiveness on children's recall across repeated interviews
AU - Brubacher, Sonja P.
AU - Poole, Debra A.
AU - Dickinson, Jason
AU - Rooy, David La
AU - Szojka, Zsófia A.
AU - Powell, Martine B.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.
AB - Objectives: Child witnesses often describe their experiences across multiple interviews. It is unknown whether talking with a familiar interviewer increases disclosures, however, or whether any benefits of a familiar interviewer could be achieved by ensuring that interviewers (regardless of familiarity) behave in socially supportive ways. This study tested the effects of interviewer familiarity and social support on children's reports of an adult's transgressions. Hypotheses: We predicted that familiarity and supportiveness would increase transgression reports at a second interview and that children who spoke with familiar, supportive interviewers would disclose the most transgressions. Method: Children (N = 160, 5 to 9 years) participated in a science event involving 6 transgressions. Across 2 interviews, they spoke with the same trained university student interviewer or different interviewers, and these interviewers engaged in supportive or neutral behaviors. Interviews were coded for overall information reported, number of transgressions, and confabulations. Results: There were no effects of support in the first interview or on total details reported in either interview. Children reported more transgressions to supportive than neutral interviewers in the second interview (IRR = 1.19), even during open-ended prompting (IRR = 1.26), and they omitted fewer transgressions that had been reported in the first interview (IRR = 0.69). Confabulations were infrequent. There were no condition differences in the total number of confabulations reported across interviews, but these errors occurred more often in the second interview in the supportive condition. Conclusions: Interviewer support may play a greater role than familiarity in facilitating children's testimony.
KW - Children
KW - Free recall
KW - Interviewer familiarity
KW - Interviewer support
KW - Repeated interviewing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071628338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/lhb0000346
DO - 10.1037/lhb0000346
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071628338
VL - 43
SP - 507
EP - 516
JO - Law and Human Behavior
JF - Law and Human Behavior
SN - 0147-7307
IS - 6
ER -