Eliciting the language sample for developmental sentence scoring

A comparison of play with toys and elicited picture description

Sarita Eisenberg, Ling Yu Guo, Emily Mucchetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated whether language samples elicited during play and description of pictured events would yield the same results for developmental sentence scoring (DSS). Method: Two language samples were elicited from 58 three-year-olds. One sample was elicited during play with a parent, and the other sample was elicited by an examiner asking children to talk about pictured events in response to elicitation questions. Results: DSS scores were not significantly different between the play and event description samples. However, sentence points were significantly higher for the play sample than for the event description sample. Although there was a correlation between sample types for both DSS and sentence points, the correlation for DSS (r =. 52) was below an acceptable level, and the correlation for sentence points (r =. 71) was at a minimally acceptable level. Agreement between sample types for pass–fail decisions on the DSS scores using the 10th percentile cutoff recommended by Lee (1974) was only moderate (78%). Conclusion: The current study shows that type of language samples could affect DSS and sentence point scores of 3-year-olds and, hence, the passing and failing decisions for their performance on DSS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-646
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Play and Playthings
toy
Language
language
event
examiner
parents

Cite this

@article{287a13907c6045a0a7e153af24e615cf,
title = "Eliciting the language sample for developmental sentence scoring: A comparison of play with toys and elicited picture description",
abstract = "Purpose: This study investigated whether language samples elicited during play and description of pictured events would yield the same results for developmental sentence scoring (DSS). Method: Two language samples were elicited from 58 three-year-olds. One sample was elicited during play with a parent, and the other sample was elicited by an examiner asking children to talk about pictured events in response to elicitation questions. Results: DSS scores were not significantly different between the play and event description samples. However, sentence points were significantly higher for the play sample than for the event description sample. Although there was a correlation between sample types for both DSS and sentence points, the correlation for DSS (r =. 52) was below an acceptable level, and the correlation for sentence points (r =. 71) was at a minimally acceptable level. Agreement between sample types for pass–fail decisions on the DSS scores using the 10th percentile cutoff recommended by Lee (1974) was only moderate (78{\%}). Conclusion: The current study shows that type of language samples could affect DSS and sentence point scores of 3-year-olds and, hence, the passing and failing decisions for their performance on DSS.",
author = "Sarita Eisenberg and Guo, {Ling Yu} and Emily Mucchetti",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0161",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "633--646",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

Eliciting the language sample for developmental sentence scoring : A comparison of play with toys and elicited picture description. / Eisenberg, Sarita; Guo, Ling Yu; Mucchetti, Emily.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 633-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eliciting the language sample for developmental sentence scoring

T2 - A comparison of play with toys and elicited picture description

AU - Eisenberg, Sarita

AU - Guo, Ling Yu

AU - Mucchetti, Emily

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Purpose: This study investigated whether language samples elicited during play and description of pictured events would yield the same results for developmental sentence scoring (DSS). Method: Two language samples were elicited from 58 three-year-olds. One sample was elicited during play with a parent, and the other sample was elicited by an examiner asking children to talk about pictured events in response to elicitation questions. Results: DSS scores were not significantly different between the play and event description samples. However, sentence points were significantly higher for the play sample than for the event description sample. Although there was a correlation between sample types for both DSS and sentence points, the correlation for DSS (r =. 52) was below an acceptable level, and the correlation for sentence points (r =. 71) was at a minimally acceptable level. Agreement between sample types for pass–fail decisions on the DSS scores using the 10th percentile cutoff recommended by Lee (1974) was only moderate (78%). Conclusion: The current study shows that type of language samples could affect DSS and sentence point scores of 3-year-olds and, hence, the passing and failing decisions for their performance on DSS.

AB - Purpose: This study investigated whether language samples elicited during play and description of pictured events would yield the same results for developmental sentence scoring (DSS). Method: Two language samples were elicited from 58 three-year-olds. One sample was elicited during play with a parent, and the other sample was elicited by an examiner asking children to talk about pictured events in response to elicitation questions. Results: DSS scores were not significantly different between the play and event description samples. However, sentence points were significantly higher for the play sample than for the event description sample. Although there was a correlation between sample types for both DSS and sentence points, the correlation for DSS (r =. 52) was below an acceptable level, and the correlation for sentence points (r =. 71) was at a minimally acceptable level. Agreement between sample types for pass–fail decisions on the DSS scores using the 10th percentile cutoff recommended by Lee (1974) was only moderate (78%). Conclusion: The current study shows that type of language samples could affect DSS and sentence point scores of 3-year-olds and, hence, the passing and failing decisions for their performance on DSS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046457479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0161

DO - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0161

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 633

EP - 646

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 2

ER -