Emotional maltreatment reports in children: The influence of state statutes and co-occurring maltreatment

Svetlana Shpiegel, Cassandra Simmel, Chien Chung Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Allegations of emotional maltreatment pose a challenge for child welfare systems, partially because state statutes tend to use vague definitions. In this study, the relationship between statutory definitions and reported rates of emotional maltreatment was examined. Using data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), comparisons were made of the rates of emotional maltreatment in broad versus narrow state statutes. Results indicated that states with broad statutes had higher rates of both alleged and substantiated emotional maltreatment, although only in cases where emotional maltreatment was the sole type of reported abuse. The results buttress the argument that definitions of emotional maltreatment suffer from a lack of clarity and consistency across the United States.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)626-643
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2013

Keywords

  • National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System
  • child abuse reporting
  • emotional abuse
  • state statutes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional maltreatment reports in children: The influence of state statutes and co-occurring maltreatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this