ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction

Steven Hoover, Tina Zottoli, Jillian Grose-Fifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment of malingering has become an integral part of many neuropsychological evaluations, particularly in forensic settings. However, traditional malingering measures are known to be vulnerable to both manipulation and coaching. Consequently, recent research has attempted to identify physiological indices of cognitive functioning that are less susceptible to overt manipulation. While prior studies have explored the validity of physiological assessment of memory deficits, this study evaluates the effectiveness of a physiological measure of executive functioning. This study used EEG recording in conjunction with a three-stimulus oddball design to compare neural responses in simulated malingerers feigning cognitive deficits associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls. Specifically, the study explored the efficacy of an event-related potential (ERP) known as P3a, which is believed to be an index of frontal lobe executive processes, specifically the attentional orienting response. The results of this study demonstrated that simulated malingerers did not produce a P3a response that was significantly different from control participants. Furthermore, the P3a in simulated malingerers did not demonstrate any of the properties reported in prior studies with TBI patients. Not only were malingerers unable to produce a significant change in their basic orienting response, but the very process of attempting to employ additional strategies to appear impaired produced other physiological markers of deception. Therefore, the P3a component appeared to be unaffected by an individual's motivation or overt performance, which suggests that it may have potential for development as a physiological measure for differentiating between malingerers and those with genuine TBI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-146
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Malingering
Memory Disorders
Frontal Lobe
Deception
Motivation
Electroencephalography
Research
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • ERP
  • Forensic psychology
  • Malingering
  • Neuropsychology
  • P300
  • P3a

Cite this

Hoover, Steven ; Zottoli, Tina ; Grose-Fifer, Jillian. / ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. In: International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2014 ; Vol. 91, No. 2. pp. 139-146.
@article{4ffdf0aa65804b52ba0033a344291fbc,
title = "ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction",
abstract = "Assessment of malingering has become an integral part of many neuropsychological evaluations, particularly in forensic settings. However, traditional malingering measures are known to be vulnerable to both manipulation and coaching. Consequently, recent research has attempted to identify physiological indices of cognitive functioning that are less susceptible to overt manipulation. While prior studies have explored the validity of physiological assessment of memory deficits, this study evaluates the effectiveness of a physiological measure of executive functioning. This study used EEG recording in conjunction with a three-stimulus oddball design to compare neural responses in simulated malingerers feigning cognitive deficits associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls. Specifically, the study explored the efficacy of an event-related potential (ERP) known as P3a, which is believed to be an index of frontal lobe executive processes, specifically the attentional orienting response. The results of this study demonstrated that simulated malingerers did not produce a P3a response that was significantly different from control participants. Furthermore, the P3a in simulated malingerers did not demonstrate any of the properties reported in prior studies with TBI patients. Not only were malingerers unable to produce a significant change in their basic orienting response, but the very process of attempting to employ additional strategies to appear impaired produced other physiological markers of deception. Therefore, the P3a component appeared to be unaffected by an individual's motivation or overt performance, which suggests that it may have potential for development as a physiological measure for differentiating between malingerers and those with genuine TBI.",
keywords = "ERP, Forensic psychology, Malingering, Neuropsychology, P300, P3a",
author = "Steven Hoover and Tina Zottoli and Jillian Grose-Fifer",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.009",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "139--146",
journal = "International Journal of Psychophysiology",
issn = "0167-8760",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. / Hoover, Steven; Zottoli, Tina; Grose-Fifer, Jillian.

In: International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 91, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 139-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction

AU - Hoover, Steven

AU - Zottoli, Tina

AU - Grose-Fifer, Jillian

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Assessment of malingering has become an integral part of many neuropsychological evaluations, particularly in forensic settings. However, traditional malingering measures are known to be vulnerable to both manipulation and coaching. Consequently, recent research has attempted to identify physiological indices of cognitive functioning that are less susceptible to overt manipulation. While prior studies have explored the validity of physiological assessment of memory deficits, this study evaluates the effectiveness of a physiological measure of executive functioning. This study used EEG recording in conjunction with a three-stimulus oddball design to compare neural responses in simulated malingerers feigning cognitive deficits associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls. Specifically, the study explored the efficacy of an event-related potential (ERP) known as P3a, which is believed to be an index of frontal lobe executive processes, specifically the attentional orienting response. The results of this study demonstrated that simulated malingerers did not produce a P3a response that was significantly different from control participants. Furthermore, the P3a in simulated malingerers did not demonstrate any of the properties reported in prior studies with TBI patients. Not only were malingerers unable to produce a significant change in their basic orienting response, but the very process of attempting to employ additional strategies to appear impaired produced other physiological markers of deception. Therefore, the P3a component appeared to be unaffected by an individual's motivation or overt performance, which suggests that it may have potential for development as a physiological measure for differentiating between malingerers and those with genuine TBI.

AB - Assessment of malingering has become an integral part of many neuropsychological evaluations, particularly in forensic settings. However, traditional malingering measures are known to be vulnerable to both manipulation and coaching. Consequently, recent research has attempted to identify physiological indices of cognitive functioning that are less susceptible to overt manipulation. While prior studies have explored the validity of physiological assessment of memory deficits, this study evaluates the effectiveness of a physiological measure of executive functioning. This study used EEG recording in conjunction with a three-stimulus oddball design to compare neural responses in simulated malingerers feigning cognitive deficits associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls. Specifically, the study explored the efficacy of an event-related potential (ERP) known as P3a, which is believed to be an index of frontal lobe executive processes, specifically the attentional orienting response. The results of this study demonstrated that simulated malingerers did not produce a P3a response that was significantly different from control participants. Furthermore, the P3a in simulated malingerers did not demonstrate any of the properties reported in prior studies with TBI patients. Not only were malingerers unable to produce a significant change in their basic orienting response, but the very process of attempting to employ additional strategies to appear impaired produced other physiological markers of deception. Therefore, the P3a component appeared to be unaffected by an individual's motivation or overt performance, which suggests that it may have potential for development as a physiological measure for differentiating between malingerers and those with genuine TBI.

KW - ERP

KW - Forensic psychology

KW - Malingering

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - P300

KW - P3a

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893780365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.009

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 139

EP - 146

JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology

JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology

SN - 0167-8760

IS - 2

ER -