Evaluating classroom dialogue Reconciling internal and external

Megan Laverty, Maughn Gregory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we present an instrument to be used by students and professors to evaluate classroom dialogue. We begin with an explanation of the classroom community of inquiry and why we value it as a pedagogical approach. We then describe our different reasons for evaluating classroom dialogue — including institutional, professional and pedagogical accountability — and describe the inherent conflicts among these reasons. We explain how our evaluation instrument was designed to ameliorate these conflicts. We recount a number of theoretical and practical problems we encountered in designing and implementing the instrument and explain how we attempted to overcome these problems. We conclude the article by describing the advantages and disadvantages of our instrument in light of our analysis of data gathered from its first implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-308
Number of pages28
JournalTheory and Research in Education
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

dialogue
classroom
university teacher
responsibility
evaluation
community
Values
student

Keywords

  • Lipman
  • Philosophy for Children
  • accountability
  • accreditation
  • classroom dialogue
  • community of inquiry
  • philosophy of education
  • self-assessment

Cite this

@article{a4b584a1e2bd48eab99f25d7c7febd27,
title = "Evaluating classroom dialogue Reconciling internal and external",
abstract = "In this article we present an instrument to be used by students and professors to evaluate classroom dialogue. We begin with an explanation of the classroom community of inquiry and why we value it as a pedagogical approach. We then describe our different reasons for evaluating classroom dialogue — including institutional, professional and pedagogical accountability — and describe the inherent conflicts among these reasons. We explain how our evaluation instrument was designed to ameliorate these conflicts. We recount a number of theoretical and practical problems we encountered in designing and implementing the instrument and explain how we attempted to overcome these problems. We conclude the article by describing the advantages and disadvantages of our instrument in light of our analysis of data gathered from its first implementation.",
keywords = "Lipman, Philosophy for Children, accountability, accreditation, classroom dialogue, community of inquiry, philosophy of education, self-assessment",
author = "Megan Laverty and Maughn Gregory",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1477878507081792",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "281--308",
journal = "Theory and Research in Education",
issn = "1477-8785",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating classroom dialogue Reconciling internal and external. / Laverty, Megan; Gregory, Maughn.

In: Theory and Research in Education, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.01.2007, p. 281-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating classroom dialogue Reconciling internal and external

AU - Laverty, Megan

AU - Gregory, Maughn

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In this article we present an instrument to be used by students and professors to evaluate classroom dialogue. We begin with an explanation of the classroom community of inquiry and why we value it as a pedagogical approach. We then describe our different reasons for evaluating classroom dialogue — including institutional, professional and pedagogical accountability — and describe the inherent conflicts among these reasons. We explain how our evaluation instrument was designed to ameliorate these conflicts. We recount a number of theoretical and practical problems we encountered in designing and implementing the instrument and explain how we attempted to overcome these problems. We conclude the article by describing the advantages and disadvantages of our instrument in light of our analysis of data gathered from its first implementation.

AB - In this article we present an instrument to be used by students and professors to evaluate classroom dialogue. We begin with an explanation of the classroom community of inquiry and why we value it as a pedagogical approach. We then describe our different reasons for evaluating classroom dialogue — including institutional, professional and pedagogical accountability — and describe the inherent conflicts among these reasons. We explain how our evaluation instrument was designed to ameliorate these conflicts. We recount a number of theoretical and practical problems we encountered in designing and implementing the instrument and explain how we attempted to overcome these problems. We conclude the article by describing the advantages and disadvantages of our instrument in light of our analysis of data gathered from its first implementation.

KW - Lipman

KW - Philosophy for Children

KW - accountability

KW - accreditation

KW - classroom dialogue

KW - community of inquiry

KW - philosophy of education

KW - self-assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997909720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1477878507081792

DO - 10.1177/1477878507081792

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84997909720

VL - 5

SP - 281

EP - 308

JO - Theory and Research in Education

JF - Theory and Research in Education

SN - 1477-8785

IS - 3

ER -