Evaluating Programs That Address Ideological Issues

Ethical and Practical Considerations for Practitioners and Evaluators

Lisa Lieberman, Michael C. Fagen, Brad L. Neiger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are important practical and ethical considerations for organizations in conducting their own, or commissioning external, evaluations and for both practitioners and evaluators, when assessing programs built on strongly held ideological or philosophical approaches. Assessing whether programs "work" has strong political, financial, and/or moral implications, particularly when expending public dollars, and may challenge objectivity about a particular program or approach. Using a case study of the evaluation of a school-based abstinence-until-marriage program, this article discusses the challenges, lessons learned, and ethical responsibilities regarding decisions about evaluation, specifically associated with ideologically driven programs. Organizations should consider various stakeholders and views associated with their program to help identify potential pitfalls in evaluation. Once identified, the program or agency needs to carefully consider its answers to two key questions: Do they want the answer and are they willing to modify the program? Having decided to evaluate, the choice of evaluator is critical to assuring that ethical principles are maintained and potential skepticism or criticism of findings can be addressed appropriately. The relationship between program and evaluator, including agreements about ownership and eventual publication and/or promotion of data, should be addressed at the outset. Programs and organizations should consider, at the outset, their ethical responsibility when findings are not expected or desired. Ultimately, agencies, organizations, and programs have an ethical responsibility to use their data to provide health promotion programs, whether ideologically founded or not, that appropriately and effectively address the problems they seek to solve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Promotion Practice
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Ethics
Organizations
Ownership
Health Promotion
Marriage
Publications

Keywords

  • ethical issues
  • evaluation
  • ideological programs

Cite this

@article{884fc63f2e9f4a558915b73f1f0d5a3a,
title = "Evaluating Programs That Address Ideological Issues: Ethical and Practical Considerations for Practitioners and Evaluators",
abstract = "There are important practical and ethical considerations for organizations in conducting their own, or commissioning external, evaluations and for both practitioners and evaluators, when assessing programs built on strongly held ideological or philosophical approaches. Assessing whether programs {"}work{"} has strong political, financial, and/or moral implications, particularly when expending public dollars, and may challenge objectivity about a particular program or approach. Using a case study of the evaluation of a school-based abstinence-until-marriage program, this article discusses the challenges, lessons learned, and ethical responsibilities regarding decisions about evaluation, specifically associated with ideologically driven programs. Organizations should consider various stakeholders and views associated with their program to help identify potential pitfalls in evaluation. Once identified, the program or agency needs to carefully consider its answers to two key questions: Do they want the answer and are they willing to modify the program? Having decided to evaluate, the choice of evaluator is critical to assuring that ethical principles are maintained and potential skepticism or criticism of findings can be addressed appropriately. The relationship between program and evaluator, including agreements about ownership and eventual publication and/or promotion of data, should be addressed at the outset. Programs and organizations should consider, at the outset, their ethical responsibility when findings are not expected or desired. Ultimately, agencies, organizations, and programs have an ethical responsibility to use their data to provide health promotion programs, whether ideologically founded or not, that appropriately and effectively address the problems they seek to solve.",
keywords = "ethical issues, evaluation, ideological programs",
author = "Lisa Lieberman and Fagen, {Michael C.} and Neiger, {Brad L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1524839913520547",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Health Promotion Practice",
issn = "1524-8399",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Evaluating Programs That Address Ideological Issues : Ethical and Practical Considerations for Practitioners and Evaluators. / Lieberman, Lisa; Fagen, Michael C.; Neiger, Brad L.

In: Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.03.2014, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Programs That Address Ideological Issues

T2 - Ethical and Practical Considerations for Practitioners and Evaluators

AU - Lieberman, Lisa

AU - Fagen, Michael C.

AU - Neiger, Brad L.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - There are important practical and ethical considerations for organizations in conducting their own, or commissioning external, evaluations and for both practitioners and evaluators, when assessing programs built on strongly held ideological or philosophical approaches. Assessing whether programs "work" has strong political, financial, and/or moral implications, particularly when expending public dollars, and may challenge objectivity about a particular program or approach. Using a case study of the evaluation of a school-based abstinence-until-marriage program, this article discusses the challenges, lessons learned, and ethical responsibilities regarding decisions about evaluation, specifically associated with ideologically driven programs. Organizations should consider various stakeholders and views associated with their program to help identify potential pitfalls in evaluation. Once identified, the program or agency needs to carefully consider its answers to two key questions: Do they want the answer and are they willing to modify the program? Having decided to evaluate, the choice of evaluator is critical to assuring that ethical principles are maintained and potential skepticism or criticism of findings can be addressed appropriately. The relationship between program and evaluator, including agreements about ownership and eventual publication and/or promotion of data, should be addressed at the outset. Programs and organizations should consider, at the outset, their ethical responsibility when findings are not expected or desired. Ultimately, agencies, organizations, and programs have an ethical responsibility to use their data to provide health promotion programs, whether ideologically founded or not, that appropriately and effectively address the problems they seek to solve.

AB - There are important practical and ethical considerations for organizations in conducting their own, or commissioning external, evaluations and for both practitioners and evaluators, when assessing programs built on strongly held ideological or philosophical approaches. Assessing whether programs "work" has strong political, financial, and/or moral implications, particularly when expending public dollars, and may challenge objectivity about a particular program or approach. Using a case study of the evaluation of a school-based abstinence-until-marriage program, this article discusses the challenges, lessons learned, and ethical responsibilities regarding decisions about evaluation, specifically associated with ideologically driven programs. Organizations should consider various stakeholders and views associated with their program to help identify potential pitfalls in evaluation. Once identified, the program or agency needs to carefully consider its answers to two key questions: Do they want the answer and are they willing to modify the program? Having decided to evaluate, the choice of evaluator is critical to assuring that ethical principles are maintained and potential skepticism or criticism of findings can be addressed appropriately. The relationship between program and evaluator, including agreements about ownership and eventual publication and/or promotion of data, should be addressed at the outset. Programs and organizations should consider, at the outset, their ethical responsibility when findings are not expected or desired. Ultimately, agencies, organizations, and programs have an ethical responsibility to use their data to provide health promotion programs, whether ideologically founded or not, that appropriately and effectively address the problems they seek to solve.

KW - ethical issues

KW - evaluation

KW - ideological programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893932689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1524839913520547

DO - 10.1177/1524839913520547

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Health Promotion Practice

JF - Health Promotion Practice

SN - 1524-8399

IS - 2

ER -