Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting

Melissa A. Harclerode, Pankaj Lal, Neeraj Vedwan, Bernabas Wolde, Michael E. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is a vital sustainable remediation practice for obtaining useful feedback and identifying societal needs. Evaluating and integrating risk perception of stakeholders into remediation and outreach efforts allows for greater insight, increases the likelihood of success and ultimately, benefits the community by protecting its members from environmental hazards. In this study, we identified risk perception factors that influenced residents' level of concern for mitigating their exposure to elevated concentrations of lead in household paint and historic fill material. Risk perception factors were assessed by an in-person survey conducted in public green spaces. The analysis of survey participants’ responses indicated that their perception of risk to exposed lead was mostly influenced by the presence of hazardous materials in close proximity to their residence, the ability to address pollution, and awareness, interest, and individual accountability in mitigating environmental risks. Responses also revealed that residents considered risk of lead and soil pollution as less menacing than the presence of more immediate and perceptible risks posed by factors such as air and water pollution. In addition, the community seemed to exhibit “optimism bias” and did not identify itself at high risk to susceptible and immediate hazards, including lead exposure. This lack of concern over lead exposure created a significant obstacle to community participation in state-led education and outreach programs. By integrating risk perception analysis and increasing stakeholder engagement, we can bring more attention to this issue, educate the public about the threat of lead pollution, and efficiently use financial resources to implement a more sustainable solution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-142
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Risk perception
risk perception
stakeholder
Lead
Remediation
remediation
Hazards
Pollution
pollution
Soil pollution
soil pollution
environmental hazard
local participation
accountability
Hazardous materials
Water pollution
environmental risk
water pollution
exposure
evaluation

Keywords

  • Lead exposure
  • Optimism bias
  • Risk attenuation
  • Risk perception
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Sustainable remediation

Cite this

@article{fa0b111944194a23babc4dcf91e4355c,
title = "Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting",
abstract = "Stakeholder engagement is a vital sustainable remediation practice for obtaining useful feedback and identifying societal needs. Evaluating and integrating risk perception of stakeholders into remediation and outreach efforts allows for greater insight, increases the likelihood of success and ultimately, benefits the community by protecting its members from environmental hazards. In this study, we identified risk perception factors that influenced residents' level of concern for mitigating their exposure to elevated concentrations of lead in household paint and historic fill material. Risk perception factors were assessed by an in-person survey conducted in public green spaces. The analysis of survey participants’ responses indicated that their perception of risk to exposed lead was mostly influenced by the presence of hazardous materials in close proximity to their residence, the ability to address pollution, and awareness, interest, and individual accountability in mitigating environmental risks. Responses also revealed that residents considered risk of lead and soil pollution as less menacing than the presence of more immediate and perceptible risks posed by factors such as air and water pollution. In addition, the community seemed to exhibit “optimism bias” and did not identify itself at high risk to susceptible and immediate hazards, including lead exposure. This lack of concern over lead exposure created a significant obstacle to community participation in state-led education and outreach programs. By integrating risk perception analysis and increasing stakeholder engagement, we can bring more attention to this issue, educate the public about the threat of lead pollution, and efficiently use financial resources to implement a more sustainable solution.",
keywords = "Lead exposure, Optimism bias, Risk attenuation, Risk perception, Stakeholder engagement, Sustainable remediation",
author = "Harclerode, {Melissa A.} and Pankaj Lal and Neeraj Vedwan and Bernabas Wolde and Miller, {Michael E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.045",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "132--142",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting. / Harclerode, Melissa A.; Lal, Pankaj; Vedwan, Neeraj; Wolde, Bernabas; Miller, Michael E.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 184, 15.12.2016, p. 132-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting

AU - Harclerode, Melissa A.

AU - Lal, Pankaj

AU - Vedwan, Neeraj

AU - Wolde, Bernabas

AU - Miller, Michael E.

PY - 2016/12/15

Y1 - 2016/12/15

N2 - Stakeholder engagement is a vital sustainable remediation practice for obtaining useful feedback and identifying societal needs. Evaluating and integrating risk perception of stakeholders into remediation and outreach efforts allows for greater insight, increases the likelihood of success and ultimately, benefits the community by protecting its members from environmental hazards. In this study, we identified risk perception factors that influenced residents' level of concern for mitigating their exposure to elevated concentrations of lead in household paint and historic fill material. Risk perception factors were assessed by an in-person survey conducted in public green spaces. The analysis of survey participants’ responses indicated that their perception of risk to exposed lead was mostly influenced by the presence of hazardous materials in close proximity to their residence, the ability to address pollution, and awareness, interest, and individual accountability in mitigating environmental risks. Responses also revealed that residents considered risk of lead and soil pollution as less menacing than the presence of more immediate and perceptible risks posed by factors such as air and water pollution. In addition, the community seemed to exhibit “optimism bias” and did not identify itself at high risk to susceptible and immediate hazards, including lead exposure. This lack of concern over lead exposure created a significant obstacle to community participation in state-led education and outreach programs. By integrating risk perception analysis and increasing stakeholder engagement, we can bring more attention to this issue, educate the public about the threat of lead pollution, and efficiently use financial resources to implement a more sustainable solution.

AB - Stakeholder engagement is a vital sustainable remediation practice for obtaining useful feedback and identifying societal needs. Evaluating and integrating risk perception of stakeholders into remediation and outreach efforts allows for greater insight, increases the likelihood of success and ultimately, benefits the community by protecting its members from environmental hazards. In this study, we identified risk perception factors that influenced residents' level of concern for mitigating their exposure to elevated concentrations of lead in household paint and historic fill material. Risk perception factors were assessed by an in-person survey conducted in public green spaces. The analysis of survey participants’ responses indicated that their perception of risk to exposed lead was mostly influenced by the presence of hazardous materials in close proximity to their residence, the ability to address pollution, and awareness, interest, and individual accountability in mitigating environmental risks. Responses also revealed that residents considered risk of lead and soil pollution as less menacing than the presence of more immediate and perceptible risks posed by factors such as air and water pollution. In addition, the community seemed to exhibit “optimism bias” and did not identify itself at high risk to susceptible and immediate hazards, including lead exposure. This lack of concern over lead exposure created a significant obstacle to community participation in state-led education and outreach programs. By integrating risk perception analysis and increasing stakeholder engagement, we can bring more attention to this issue, educate the public about the threat of lead pollution, and efficiently use financial resources to implement a more sustainable solution.

KW - Lead exposure

KW - Optimism bias

KW - Risk attenuation

KW - Risk perception

KW - Stakeholder engagement

KW - Sustainable remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979750804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.045

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.045

M3 - Article

VL - 184

SP - 132

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -