Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia

Bernabas Wolde, Pankaj Lal, Janaki Alavalapati, Pralhad Burli, John Munsell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies have shown that woody bioenergy can have potential economic, social, and environmental benefits. One of the ways to meet the growing biomass demand for woody bioenergy is by allocating currently non-forested land for growing feedstocks such as pine. Towards this end, we conducted a survey on 900 randomly selected private forestland owners in Virginia and asked what proportion of their non-forested land they would allocate for loblolly pine at given bid prices. We then used recursive partitioning based Tobit regression to analyze data. Our results suggest that the experience of having supplied wood for chip-n-saw mills in the past five years, large land holding, prior experience with state/federal financial/technical support programs, among other factors, lead to smaller proportion of non-forested land being allocated for pine. However, a higher price offer, stronger preference for producing non-timber forest products such as evergreen boughs and grapevine, and lesser dependence on working the land for annual income lead to larger proportion of non-forested land being allocate for pine. Our results could assist policy makers in developing and improving land use and energy policies, certification programs, and extension and outreach services. Our contribution also includes the use of threshold analyses to delineate tipping points in variables associated with different response rates and showing the different effect of variables in terms of how they affect the supply of biomass and the supply of land for bioenergy purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-75
Number of pages7
JournalBiomass and Bioenergy
Volume85
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

bioenergy
Biomass
plantation
Pinus
plantations
Energy policy
Land use
Feedstocks
Wood
Economics
land policy
energy policy
land ownership
nontimber forest products
outreach
wood chips
social benefit
biomass
nontimber forest product
certification

Keywords

  • Forestland owners
  • Land use change
  • Recursive partitioning
  • Tobit model
  • Virginia
  • Woody bioenergy

Cite this

Wolde, Bernabas ; Lal, Pankaj ; Alavalapati, Janaki ; Burli, Pralhad ; Munsell, John. / Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia. In: Biomass and Bioenergy. 2016 ; Vol. 85. pp. 69-75.
@article{4299a3c7e7ac472a9d86366cf1701616,
title = "Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia",
abstract = "Studies have shown that woody bioenergy can have potential economic, social, and environmental benefits. One of the ways to meet the growing biomass demand for woody bioenergy is by allocating currently non-forested land for growing feedstocks such as pine. Towards this end, we conducted a survey on 900 randomly selected private forestland owners in Virginia and asked what proportion of their non-forested land they would allocate for loblolly pine at given bid prices. We then used recursive partitioning based Tobit regression to analyze data. Our results suggest that the experience of having supplied wood for chip-n-saw mills in the past five years, large land holding, prior experience with state/federal financial/technical support programs, among other factors, lead to smaller proportion of non-forested land being allocated for pine. However, a higher price offer, stronger preference for producing non-timber forest products such as evergreen boughs and grapevine, and lesser dependence on working the land for annual income lead to larger proportion of non-forested land being allocate for pine. Our results could assist policy makers in developing and improving land use and energy policies, certification programs, and extension and outreach services. Our contribution also includes the use of threshold analyses to delineate tipping points in variables associated with different response rates and showing the different effect of variables in terms of how they affect the supply of biomass and the supply of land for bioenergy purposes.",
keywords = "Forestland owners, Land use change, Recursive partitioning, Tobit model, Virginia, Woody bioenergy",
author = "Bernabas Wolde and Pankaj Lal and Janaki Alavalapati and Pralhad Burli and John Munsell",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "69--75",
journal = "Biomass and Bioenergy",
issn = "0961-9534",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia. / Wolde, Bernabas; Lal, Pankaj; Alavalapati, Janaki; Burli, Pralhad; Munsell, John.

In: Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 85, 01.02.2016, p. 69-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia

AU - Wolde, Bernabas

AU - Lal, Pankaj

AU - Alavalapati, Janaki

AU - Burli, Pralhad

AU - Munsell, John

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Studies have shown that woody bioenergy can have potential economic, social, and environmental benefits. One of the ways to meet the growing biomass demand for woody bioenergy is by allocating currently non-forested land for growing feedstocks such as pine. Towards this end, we conducted a survey on 900 randomly selected private forestland owners in Virginia and asked what proportion of their non-forested land they would allocate for loblolly pine at given bid prices. We then used recursive partitioning based Tobit regression to analyze data. Our results suggest that the experience of having supplied wood for chip-n-saw mills in the past five years, large land holding, prior experience with state/federal financial/technical support programs, among other factors, lead to smaller proportion of non-forested land being allocated for pine. However, a higher price offer, stronger preference for producing non-timber forest products such as evergreen boughs and grapevine, and lesser dependence on working the land for annual income lead to larger proportion of non-forested land being allocate for pine. Our results could assist policy makers in developing and improving land use and energy policies, certification programs, and extension and outreach services. Our contribution also includes the use of threshold analyses to delineate tipping points in variables associated with different response rates and showing the different effect of variables in terms of how they affect the supply of biomass and the supply of land for bioenergy purposes.

AB - Studies have shown that woody bioenergy can have potential economic, social, and environmental benefits. One of the ways to meet the growing biomass demand for woody bioenergy is by allocating currently non-forested land for growing feedstocks such as pine. Towards this end, we conducted a survey on 900 randomly selected private forestland owners in Virginia and asked what proportion of their non-forested land they would allocate for loblolly pine at given bid prices. We then used recursive partitioning based Tobit regression to analyze data. Our results suggest that the experience of having supplied wood for chip-n-saw mills in the past five years, large land holding, prior experience with state/federal financial/technical support programs, among other factors, lead to smaller proportion of non-forested land being allocated for pine. However, a higher price offer, stronger preference for producing non-timber forest products such as evergreen boughs and grapevine, and lesser dependence on working the land for annual income lead to larger proportion of non-forested land being allocate for pine. Our results could assist policy makers in developing and improving land use and energy policies, certification programs, and extension and outreach services. Our contribution also includes the use of threshold analyses to delineate tipping points in variables associated with different response rates and showing the different effect of variables in terms of how they affect the supply of biomass and the supply of land for bioenergy purposes.

KW - Forestland owners

KW - Land use change

KW - Recursive partitioning

KW - Tobit model

KW - Virginia

KW - Woody bioenergy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949883073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 69

EP - 75

JO - Biomass and Bioenergy

JF - Biomass and Bioenergy

SN - 0961-9534

ER -