Faking in personality assessment

A "Multisaturation" perspective on faking as performance

Robert P. Tett, Daniel Simonet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerns about socially desirable responding on self-report personality tests are heightened in employment settings where motivation to fake is elevated. Building on prior faking models and the classical X = T + e measurement model, we offer a unique performance-based perspective, in which opportunity, ability, and motivation to fake are jointly critical (P = O × A × M). Trait activation theory is used to show how impression management and self-deception can express multiple abilities and traits beyond those targeted and how response biases might be reduced. Three sets of testable hypotheses are offered. That nontargeted traits (e.g., ambition) serving faking might contribute to the prediction of job performance supports the view that faking could benefit selection decisions. Several arguments against this perspective are proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-321
Number of pages20
JournalHuman Performance
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Aptitude
Motivation
Personality Tests
Deception
Self Report
Faking
Personality assessment
Work Performance

Cite this

@article{d56dde501c0f40b9b8250cb24b7aa374,
title = "Faking in personality assessment: A {"}Multisaturation{"} perspective on faking as performance",
abstract = "Concerns about socially desirable responding on self-report personality tests are heightened in employment settings where motivation to fake is elevated. Building on prior faking models and the classical X = T + e measurement model, we offer a unique performance-based perspective, in which opportunity, ability, and motivation to fake are jointly critical (P = O × A × M). Trait activation theory is used to show how impression management and self-deception can express multiple abilities and traits beyond those targeted and how response biases might be reduced. Three sets of testable hypotheses are offered. That nontargeted traits (e.g., ambition) serving faking might contribute to the prediction of job performance supports the view that faking could benefit selection decisions. Several arguments against this perspective are proposed.",
author = "Tett, {Robert P.} and Daniel Simonet",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08959285.2011.597472",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "302--321",
journal = "Human Performance",
issn = "0895-9285",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Faking in personality assessment : A "Multisaturation" perspective on faking as performance. / Tett, Robert P.; Simonet, Daniel.

In: Human Performance, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.09.2011, p. 302-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faking in personality assessment

T2 - A "Multisaturation" perspective on faking as performance

AU - Tett, Robert P.

AU - Simonet, Daniel

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Concerns about socially desirable responding on self-report personality tests are heightened in employment settings where motivation to fake is elevated. Building on prior faking models and the classical X = T + e measurement model, we offer a unique performance-based perspective, in which opportunity, ability, and motivation to fake are jointly critical (P = O × A × M). Trait activation theory is used to show how impression management and self-deception can express multiple abilities and traits beyond those targeted and how response biases might be reduced. Three sets of testable hypotheses are offered. That nontargeted traits (e.g., ambition) serving faking might contribute to the prediction of job performance supports the view that faking could benefit selection decisions. Several arguments against this perspective are proposed.

AB - Concerns about socially desirable responding on self-report personality tests are heightened in employment settings where motivation to fake is elevated. Building on prior faking models and the classical X = T + e measurement model, we offer a unique performance-based perspective, in which opportunity, ability, and motivation to fake are jointly critical (P = O × A × M). Trait activation theory is used to show how impression management and self-deception can express multiple abilities and traits beyond those targeted and how response biases might be reduced. Three sets of testable hypotheses are offered. That nontargeted traits (e.g., ambition) serving faking might contribute to the prediction of job performance supports the view that faking could benefit selection decisions. Several arguments against this perspective are proposed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052823313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08959285.2011.597472

DO - 10.1080/08959285.2011.597472

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 302

EP - 321

JO - Human Performance

JF - Human Performance

SN - 0895-9285

IS - 4

ER -