Farming alone? What's up with the "C" in community supported agriculture

Antoinette Pole, Margaret Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reconsiders the purported benefits of community found in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). Using an online survey of members who belong to CSAs in New York, between November and December 2010, we assess members' reasons for joining a CSA, and their perceptions of community within their CSA and beyond. A total of 565 CSA members responded to the survey. Results show an overwhelming majority of members joined their CSA for fresh, local, organic produce, while few respondents joined their CSA to build community, meet like-minded individuals or share financial risk with farmers. Members reported that they do not derive a strong sense of community from either their CSA or other forms of community, yet they volunteered at their CSA and appear to be engaged in activities within their communities, though the frequency of the latter is unknown. These data suggest New York CSAs are oriented toward the instrumental and functional models, which emphasize the economic aspects of farming rather than collaborative models, which foster community (Feagan and Henderson 2009).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-100
Number of pages16
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

community supported agriculture
farming systems
stocks and shares
farmers

Keywords

  • CSA members
  • Community
  • Community supported agriculture (CSA)
  • New York

Cite this

@article{ddb7aa63339e4731adc634cdec8d2f5a,
title = "Farming alone? What's up with the {"}C{"} in community supported agriculture",
abstract = "This study reconsiders the purported benefits of community found in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). Using an online survey of members who belong to CSAs in New York, between November and December 2010, we assess members' reasons for joining a CSA, and their perceptions of community within their CSA and beyond. A total of 565 CSA members responded to the survey. Results show an overwhelming majority of members joined their CSA for fresh, local, organic produce, while few respondents joined their CSA to build community, meet like-minded individuals or share financial risk with farmers. Members reported that they do not derive a strong sense of community from either their CSA or other forms of community, yet they volunteered at their CSA and appear to be engaged in activities within their communities, though the frequency of the latter is unknown. These data suggest New York CSAs are oriented toward the instrumental and functional models, which emphasize the economic aspects of farming rather than collaborative models, which foster community (Feagan and Henderson 2009).",
keywords = "CSA members, Community, Community supported agriculture (CSA), New York",
author = "Antoinette Pole and Margaret Gray",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-012-9391-9",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "85--100",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Farming alone? What's up with the "C" in community supported agriculture. / Pole, Antoinette; Gray, Margaret.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 85-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farming alone? What's up with the "C" in community supported agriculture

AU - Pole, Antoinette

AU - Gray, Margaret

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - This study reconsiders the purported benefits of community found in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). Using an online survey of members who belong to CSAs in New York, between November and December 2010, we assess members' reasons for joining a CSA, and their perceptions of community within their CSA and beyond. A total of 565 CSA members responded to the survey. Results show an overwhelming majority of members joined their CSA for fresh, local, organic produce, while few respondents joined their CSA to build community, meet like-minded individuals or share financial risk with farmers. Members reported that they do not derive a strong sense of community from either their CSA or other forms of community, yet they volunteered at their CSA and appear to be engaged in activities within their communities, though the frequency of the latter is unknown. These data suggest New York CSAs are oriented toward the instrumental and functional models, which emphasize the economic aspects of farming rather than collaborative models, which foster community (Feagan and Henderson 2009).

AB - This study reconsiders the purported benefits of community found in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). Using an online survey of members who belong to CSAs in New York, between November and December 2010, we assess members' reasons for joining a CSA, and their perceptions of community within their CSA and beyond. A total of 565 CSA members responded to the survey. Results show an overwhelming majority of members joined their CSA for fresh, local, organic produce, while few respondents joined their CSA to build community, meet like-minded individuals or share financial risk with farmers. Members reported that they do not derive a strong sense of community from either their CSA or other forms of community, yet they volunteered at their CSA and appear to be engaged in activities within their communities, though the frequency of the latter is unknown. These data suggest New York CSAs are oriented toward the instrumental and functional models, which emphasize the economic aspects of farming rather than collaborative models, which foster community (Feagan and Henderson 2009).

KW - CSA members

KW - Community

KW - Community supported agriculture (CSA)

KW - New York

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874022606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-012-9391-9

DO - 10.1007/s10460-012-9391-9

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 85

EP - 100

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 1

ER -