TY - JOUR
T1 - Ferrate(VI) decomposition in water in the absence and presence of natural organic matter (NOM)
AU - Deng, Yang
AU - Jung, Chanil
AU - Liang, Yongmei
AU - Goodey, Nina
AU - Waite, Thomas D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/2/15
Y1 - 2018/2/15
N2 - The kinetics of ferrate(VI) decomposition in natural water were assessed in the absence and presence of natural organic matter (NOM) (pH = 7.50, [Fe(VI)] = 54 µM, DOC = 0.00–10.00 and 1.00–8.57 mg/L for a simulated natural water and six real natural waters, respectively). Without NOM, Fe(VI) decomposition in simulated natural water exhibited a biphasic kinetics pattern, i.e. a 2nd-order reaction with respect to Fe(VI) concentration followed by a 1st-order reaction. However, an additional instant Fe(VI) loss was observed at the onset in the presence of NOM for both simulated and real natural waters, thereby rendering Fe(VI) decay with NOM a unique three-stage kinetics pattern. The initial instant Fe(VI) loss was caused due to the homogenous Fe(VI) self-decay and the rapid reactions between Fe(VI) and NOM. The latter accounted for a major fraction of the initial Fe(VI) loss and was in direct proportion with the initial DOC (DOC0) (Δ[Fe(VI)]0DOC = αNOM DOC0; αNOM = 1.45 µM Fe(VI)·L/mg DOC for the simulated natural water, and 0.66–1.35 µM Fe(VI)·L/mg DOC for the six natural waters). Fe(VI) decomposition experiments with different Suwannee River NOM isolates revealed that hydrophobic NOM fractions (i.e. fulvic acid (FA) and humic acid (HA)) caused a more significant initial Fe(VI) loss than the hydrophilic group (HPI), suggesting that Fe(VI) preferentially reacted with hydrophobic NOM molecules rather than hydrophilic compounds. Furthermore, an approach developed for the estimation of αNOM revealed a linear correlation between αNOM and specific UV absorbance (SUVA) (αNOM = 0.27SUVA + 0.18, R2 = 0.71). This study provides essential information regarding Fe(VI) decomposition for the determination of Fe(VI) dose and exposure for effective water treatment.
AB - The kinetics of ferrate(VI) decomposition in natural water were assessed in the absence and presence of natural organic matter (NOM) (pH = 7.50, [Fe(VI)] = 54 µM, DOC = 0.00–10.00 and 1.00–8.57 mg/L for a simulated natural water and six real natural waters, respectively). Without NOM, Fe(VI) decomposition in simulated natural water exhibited a biphasic kinetics pattern, i.e. a 2nd-order reaction with respect to Fe(VI) concentration followed by a 1st-order reaction. However, an additional instant Fe(VI) loss was observed at the onset in the presence of NOM for both simulated and real natural waters, thereby rendering Fe(VI) decay with NOM a unique three-stage kinetics pattern. The initial instant Fe(VI) loss was caused due to the homogenous Fe(VI) self-decay and the rapid reactions between Fe(VI) and NOM. The latter accounted for a major fraction of the initial Fe(VI) loss and was in direct proportion with the initial DOC (DOC0) (Δ[Fe(VI)]0DOC = αNOM DOC0; αNOM = 1.45 µM Fe(VI)·L/mg DOC for the simulated natural water, and 0.66–1.35 µM Fe(VI)·L/mg DOC for the six natural waters). Fe(VI) decomposition experiments with different Suwannee River NOM isolates revealed that hydrophobic NOM fractions (i.e. fulvic acid (FA) and humic acid (HA)) caused a more significant initial Fe(VI) loss than the hydrophilic group (HPI), suggesting that Fe(VI) preferentially reacted with hydrophobic NOM molecules rather than hydrophilic compounds. Furthermore, an approach developed for the estimation of αNOM revealed a linear correlation between αNOM and specific UV absorbance (SUVA) (αNOM = 0.27SUVA + 0.18, R2 = 0.71). This study provides essential information regarding Fe(VI) decomposition for the determination of Fe(VI) dose and exposure for effective water treatment.
KW - Decomposition
KW - Drinking water treatment
KW - Ferrate(VI)
KW - Initial Fe(VI) loss
KW - Natural organic matter (NOM)
KW - Specific UV absorbance (SUVA)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037052671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037052671
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 334
SP - 2335
EP - 2342
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
ER -