Five perspectives on the leadership-management relationship

A competency-based evaluation and integration

Daniel Simonet, Robert P. Tett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How management and leadership are best conceptualized with respect to each other has been a frequent topic of debate. Five distinct perspectives are identified in the literature, including bipolar, unidimensional, bidimensional, hierarchical-management within leadership, and hierarchical-leadership within management. We assessed the viability of these perspectives by having Academy of Management and Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology experts (N = 43) map a comprehensive set of 63 managerial and leadership competencies, as a "common language," onto defined and undefined management and leadership dimensions. Results reveal interpretable patterns of uniqueness and overlap, suggesting a hybrid co-dimensional/bidimensional configuration. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the precedence of "what" over "how" in developing leadership and management theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-213
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Leadership and Organizational Studies
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

leadership
evaluation
management
industrial psychology
organizational psychology
academy
Evaluation
Relationship management
Competency
expert
language

Keywords

  • Competencies
  • Debate
  • Differences
  • Integration
  • Leadership
  • Leadership versus management
  • Management

Cite this

@article{08891686805e407fa350f86ab33e867c,
title = "Five perspectives on the leadership-management relationship: A competency-based evaluation and integration",
abstract = "How management and leadership are best conceptualized with respect to each other has been a frequent topic of debate. Five distinct perspectives are identified in the literature, including bipolar, unidimensional, bidimensional, hierarchical-management within leadership, and hierarchical-leadership within management. We assessed the viability of these perspectives by having Academy of Management and Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology experts (N = 43) map a comprehensive set of 63 managerial and leadership competencies, as a {"}common language,{"} onto defined and undefined management and leadership dimensions. Results reveal interpretable patterns of uniqueness and overlap, suggesting a hybrid co-dimensional/bidimensional configuration. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the precedence of {"}what{"} over {"}how{"} in developing leadership and management theory.",
keywords = "Competencies, Debate, Differences, Integration, Leadership, Leadership versus management, Management",
author = "Daniel Simonet and Tett, {Robert P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1548051812467205",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "199--213",
journal = "Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies",
issn = "1548-0518",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Five perspectives on the leadership-management relationship : A competency-based evaluation and integration. / Simonet, Daniel; Tett, Robert P.

In: Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 199-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five perspectives on the leadership-management relationship

T2 - A competency-based evaluation and integration

AU - Simonet, Daniel

AU - Tett, Robert P.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - How management and leadership are best conceptualized with respect to each other has been a frequent topic of debate. Five distinct perspectives are identified in the literature, including bipolar, unidimensional, bidimensional, hierarchical-management within leadership, and hierarchical-leadership within management. We assessed the viability of these perspectives by having Academy of Management and Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology experts (N = 43) map a comprehensive set of 63 managerial and leadership competencies, as a "common language," onto defined and undefined management and leadership dimensions. Results reveal interpretable patterns of uniqueness and overlap, suggesting a hybrid co-dimensional/bidimensional configuration. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the precedence of "what" over "how" in developing leadership and management theory.

AB - How management and leadership are best conceptualized with respect to each other has been a frequent topic of debate. Five distinct perspectives are identified in the literature, including bipolar, unidimensional, bidimensional, hierarchical-management within leadership, and hierarchical-leadership within management. We assessed the viability of these perspectives by having Academy of Management and Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology experts (N = 43) map a comprehensive set of 63 managerial and leadership competencies, as a "common language," onto defined and undefined management and leadership dimensions. Results reveal interpretable patterns of uniqueness and overlap, suggesting a hybrid co-dimensional/bidimensional configuration. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the precedence of "what" over "how" in developing leadership and management theory.

KW - Competencies

KW - Debate

KW - Differences

KW - Integration

KW - Leadership

KW - Leadership versus management

KW - Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897618483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1548051812467205

DO - 10.1177/1548051812467205

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 199

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

JF - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

SN - 1548-0518

IS - 2

ER -