Abstract
How management and leadership are best conceptualized with respect to each other has been a frequent topic of debate. Five distinct perspectives are identified in the literature, including bipolar, unidimensional, bidimensional, hierarchical-management within leadership, and hierarchical-leadership within management. We assessed the viability of these perspectives by having Academy of Management and Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology experts (N = 43) map a comprehensive set of 63 managerial and leadership competencies, as a "common language," onto defined and undefined management and leadership dimensions. Results reveal interpretable patterns of uniqueness and overlap, suggesting a hybrid co-dimensional/bidimensional configuration. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the precedence of "what" over "how" in developing leadership and management theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 199-213 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2013 |
Keywords
- Competencies
- Debate
- Differences
- Integration
- Leadership
- Leadership versus management
- Management