TY - JOUR
T1 - Formative Assessment in Focus
T2 - An Exploration of Theory and Practice
AU - Riley-Lepo, Erin
AU - Barnes, Nicole
AU - Fives, Helenrose
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - We sought to understand how both scholars and practitioners conceptualized formative assessment. First, we conducted an umbrella review of scholar’s definitions of formative assessment, as a proxy to understand how formative assessment is presented to preservice teachers in coursework. Then we engaged in an inquiry community with three university-based student teaching supervisors (supervisors) to understand how they conceptualized formative assessment, and the extent to which their conceptualizations mirrored the scholarly definitions. We organized our findings across five parameters (i.e., who, why, what, when, how) of formative assessment. While supervisors defined formative assessment along some of these parameters, their conceptualizations of formative assessment differed in two ways. There was variability in the supervisors understanding of what should be assessed with formative assessment and they emphasized the importance of accountability and validity in formative assessment. When synthesized, these findings provide a comprehensive framework for teacher educators.
AB - We sought to understand how both scholars and practitioners conceptualized formative assessment. First, we conducted an umbrella review of scholar’s definitions of formative assessment, as a proxy to understand how formative assessment is presented to preservice teachers in coursework. Then we engaged in an inquiry community with three university-based student teaching supervisors (supervisors) to understand how they conceptualized formative assessment, and the extent to which their conceptualizations mirrored the scholarly definitions. We organized our findings across five parameters (i.e., who, why, what, when, how) of formative assessment. While supervisors defined formative assessment along some of these parameters, their conceptualizations of formative assessment differed in two ways. There was variability in the supervisors understanding of what should be assessed with formative assessment and they emphasized the importance of accountability and validity in formative assessment. When synthesized, these findings provide a comprehensive framework for teacher educators.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210972106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08878730.2024.2436417
DO - 10.1080/08878730.2024.2436417
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210972106
SN - 0887-8730
JO - Teacher Educator
JF - Teacher Educator
ER -