TY - JOUR
T1 - Fossil leaf cuticle
T2 - Best practices for preparation and paleo-CO2 analysis
AU - Zhang, Xiaoqing
AU - Royer, Dana L.
AU - Colombi, Carina E.
AU - Drovandi, Juan Martin
AU - McElwain, Jennifer C.
AU - Guignard, Gaëtan
AU - Leng, Qin
AU - Lomax, Barry H.
AU - Sheldon, Nathan D.
AU - Stein, Rebekah A.
AU - Upchurch, Garland R.
AU - Wang, Yongdong
AU - Yang, Hong
AU - Barclay, Richard S.
AU - Cui, Ying
AU - Kürschner, Wolfram
AU - Milligan, Joseph N.
AU - Montañez, Isabel
AU - Richey, Jon D.
AU - Reichgelt, Tammo
AU - Shi, Gongle
AU - Smith, Selena Y.
AU - Steinthorsdottir, Margret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Leaf cuticle is the waxy envelope that protects leaves from desiccation, UV damage, and abrasion. The cuticle encodes information about a plant's chemistry and leaf epidermal and stomatal cell morphology. Fossil leaf cuticle has been used to determine taxonomic affinities for almost two centuries and recognized in recent decades for its value in reconstructing paleoenvironments and paleoclimates, especially atmospheric CO2. Fossil leaf cuticle preparation techniques are typically reported as single workflows tied to individual studies, starting with finding fossils in the field through the steps of preparing cuticle for chemical and morphological analysis, including decisions about type of microscopy and level of sampling effort at different spatial scales (number of fields-of-view, leaves, and species). The siloed nature of these publications makes finding appropriate methods and workflows for new studies difficult, especially for less experienced researchers. Here, we attempt to synthesize a breadth of existing workflows and make recommendations to guide methodological decision-making for new studies, with a particular focus on paleo-CO2 reconstruction via a proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (the Franks model). We describe and annotate chemical procedures for preparing cuticles for analysis and include recommendations regarding leaf conditions for which each is most appropriate. For studies making repeated measures of morphology (e.g., stomatal density), we describe a resampling routine that can guide decision-making, in real time, about sampling effort.
AB - Leaf cuticle is the waxy envelope that protects leaves from desiccation, UV damage, and abrasion. The cuticle encodes information about a plant's chemistry and leaf epidermal and stomatal cell morphology. Fossil leaf cuticle has been used to determine taxonomic affinities for almost two centuries and recognized in recent decades for its value in reconstructing paleoenvironments and paleoclimates, especially atmospheric CO2. Fossil leaf cuticle preparation techniques are typically reported as single workflows tied to individual studies, starting with finding fossils in the field through the steps of preparing cuticle for chemical and morphological analysis, including decisions about type of microscopy and level of sampling effort at different spatial scales (number of fields-of-view, leaves, and species). The siloed nature of these publications makes finding appropriate methods and workflows for new studies difficult, especially for less experienced researchers. Here, we attempt to synthesize a breadth of existing workflows and make recommendations to guide methodological decision-making for new studies, with a particular focus on paleo-CO2 reconstruction via a proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (the Franks model). We describe and annotate chemical procedures for preparing cuticles for analysis and include recommendations regarding leaf conditions for which each is most appropriate. For studies making repeated measures of morphology (e.g., stomatal density), we describe a resampling routine that can guide decision-making, in real time, about sampling effort.
KW - Leaf cuticle
KW - Leaf-gas exchange
KW - Paleobotany
KW - PALEOCLIMATE
KW - Stable Isotopes
KW - Stomata
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000608667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105104
DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105104
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105000608667
SN - 0012-8252
VL - 264
JO - Earth-Science Reviews
JF - Earth-Science Reviews
M1 - 105104
ER -