Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fraud Losses: An Examination of Gender, Opportunity, and Social Identity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The intersection of gender and crime has been of interest to academics and practitioners since at least the 1970s. Beginning in 1996, an examination of descriptive statistics (e.g., median fraud loss) related to gender included in the ACFE Reports to the Nations suggests that male perpetrators cause significantly more losses than female perpetrators. Using a lens of opportunity, social comparison, and social identity, as opposed to the gendered theory of crime, we explore the impact of gender and position on fraud loss using an ACFE dataset. We generally find that once employment position is considered, there are not significant differences in fraud losses between female and male perpetrators, consistent with one’s position providing opportunity to commit fraud. These findings represent an important step in understanding the relation between gender, position, and fraud activity. Our study provides new insights for practitioners and academics to better evaluate organizational fraud risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-334
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Forensic Accounting Research
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • ACFE Report to the Nations
  • employment position
  • fraud
  • gender

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fraud Losses: An Examination of Gender, Opportunity, and Social Identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this