Abstract
Background: The majority of disaster survivors suffering from psychological symptoms do not receive mental health services. Research on barriers to service use among disaster survivors is limited by a lack of longitudinal studies of representative samples and investigations of predictors of barriers. The purpose of this study was to address these limitations through analysis of a three-wave population-based study of Hurricane Ike survivors (N = 658). Methods: Frequencies of preference, outcome expectancy, resource, and stigma barriers among participants with unmet mental health needs were documented and logistic regression using a generalized estimating equations approach explored predisposing (e.g., age), illness-related (e.g., posttraumatic stress) and enabling (e.g., insurance coverage) factors as predictors of each type of barrier. Results: Preference barriers were most frequently cited at each wave, whereas stigma barriers were least frequently cited. Older age and higher emotional support predicted preference barriers; being a parent of a child under 18-years old at the time of the hurricane, higher generalized anxiety, and lack of insurance predicted resource barriers; and higher posttraumatic stress predicted stigma barriers. Conclusions: These findings suggest that postdisaster practices targeting subpopulations most likely to have barriers to service use may be indicated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-108 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Barriers to service use
- Mental health services
- Natural disasters
- Posttraumatic stress
- Stigma
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Frequencies and predictors of barriers to mental health service use: a longitudinal study of Hurricane Ike survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver