From artistic creation to aesthetic reception

The mirror model of art

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fields of creativity and aesthetics remain relatively separate in spite of the great advances made in the psychology of the arts over the past century. This divide has limited our understanding of the experience of art. Here I present a model that describes the interface between the two sides: art-making and art-viewing. According to the model, aesthetic experiences mirror the art-making process in the sense that the early stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the final stages of art-making; conversely, the late stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the initial stages of art-making. Considering the aesthetic processing of an artwork in terms of the artistic processes that produced it allows for an account of the experience of art in its fullest manifestation: one that could be selfreferential, pleasurable, challenging, or even repulsive. To provide a background, a review of relevant research on creativity and aesthetics is provided. The theoretical and practical implications of the mirror model are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-275
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Art
Esthetics
Creativity
Artistic Creation
Reception
Aesthetics
Psychology
Research

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Art-making
  • Creativity
  • Painting
  • Psychology of art

Cite this

@article{377d79bf720544948a68aa6418921dac,
title = "From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art",
abstract = "The fields of creativity and aesthetics remain relatively separate in spite of the great advances made in the psychology of the arts over the past century. This divide has limited our understanding of the experience of art. Here I present a model that describes the interface between the two sides: art-making and art-viewing. According to the model, aesthetic experiences mirror the art-making process in the sense that the early stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the final stages of art-making; conversely, the late stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the initial stages of art-making. Considering the aesthetic processing of an artwork in terms of the artistic processes that produced it allows for an account of the experience of art in its fullest manifestation: one that could be selfreferential, pleasurable, challenging, or even repulsive. To provide a background, a review of relevant research on creativity and aesthetics is provided. The theoretical and practical implications of the mirror model are also discussed.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Art-making, Creativity, Painting, Psychology of art",
author = "Pablo Tinio",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0030872",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "265--275",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

From artistic creation to aesthetic reception : The mirror model of art. / Tinio, Pablo.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.08.2013, p. 265-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From artistic creation to aesthetic reception

T2 - The mirror model of art

AU - Tinio, Pablo

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - The fields of creativity and aesthetics remain relatively separate in spite of the great advances made in the psychology of the arts over the past century. This divide has limited our understanding of the experience of art. Here I present a model that describes the interface between the two sides: art-making and art-viewing. According to the model, aesthetic experiences mirror the art-making process in the sense that the early stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the final stages of art-making; conversely, the late stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the initial stages of art-making. Considering the aesthetic processing of an artwork in terms of the artistic processes that produced it allows for an account of the experience of art in its fullest manifestation: one that could be selfreferential, pleasurable, challenging, or even repulsive. To provide a background, a review of relevant research on creativity and aesthetics is provided. The theoretical and practical implications of the mirror model are also discussed.

AB - The fields of creativity and aesthetics remain relatively separate in spite of the great advances made in the psychology of the arts over the past century. This divide has limited our understanding of the experience of art. Here I present a model that describes the interface between the two sides: art-making and art-viewing. According to the model, aesthetic experiences mirror the art-making process in the sense that the early stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the final stages of art-making; conversely, the late stages of aesthetic processing correspond to the initial stages of art-making. Considering the aesthetic processing of an artwork in terms of the artistic processes that produced it allows for an account of the experience of art in its fullest manifestation: one that could be selfreferential, pleasurable, challenging, or even repulsive. To provide a background, a review of relevant research on creativity and aesthetics is provided. The theoretical and practical implications of the mirror model are also discussed.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Art-making

KW - Creativity

KW - Painting

KW - Psychology of art

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882981113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0030872

DO - 10.1037/a0030872

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 265

EP - 275

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 3

ER -