Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration

Rachel A. Scheperle, Shawn S. Goodman, Stephen T. Neely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantifying ear-canal sound level in forward pressure has been suggested as a more accurate and practical alternative to sound pressure level (SPL) calibrations used in clinical settings. The mathematical isolation of forward (and reverse) pressure requires defining the Thvenin-equivalent impedance and pressure of the sound source and characteristic impedance of the load; however, the extent to which inaccuracies in characterizing the source and/or load impact forward pressure level (FPL) calibrations has not been specifically evaluated. This study examined how commercially available probe tips and estimates of characteristic impedance impact the calculation of forward and reverse pressure in a number of test cavities with dimensions chosen to reflect human ear-canal dimensions. Results demonstrate that FPL calibration, which has already been shown to be more accurate than in situ SPL calibration, can be improved particularly around standing-wave null frequencies by refining estimates of characteristic impedance. Better estimates allow FPL to be accurately calculated at least through 10 kHz using a variety of probe tips in test cavities of different sizes, suggesting that FPL calibration can be performed in ear canals of all sizes. Additionally, FPL calibration appears a reasonable option when quantifying the levels of extended high-frequency (10-18 kHz) stimuli.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3882-3892
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume130
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Calibration
Pressure
canals
Electric Impedance
ear
Ear Canal
impedance
sound pressure
estimates
impact loads
In Situ
cavities
acoustics
probes
refining
standing waves
stimuli
isolation
Sound

Cite this

Scheperle, Rachel A. ; Goodman, Shawn S. ; Neely, Stephen T. / Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2011 ; Vol. 130, No. 6. pp. 3882-3892.
@article{daceaa6fb84f4ce7b9c5db3f4d5f361f,
title = "Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration",
abstract = "Quantifying ear-canal sound level in forward pressure has been suggested as a more accurate and practical alternative to sound pressure level (SPL) calibrations used in clinical settings. The mathematical isolation of forward (and reverse) pressure requires defining the Thvenin-equivalent impedance and pressure of the sound source and characteristic impedance of the load; however, the extent to which inaccuracies in characterizing the source and/or load impact forward pressure level (FPL) calibrations has not been specifically evaluated. This study examined how commercially available probe tips and estimates of characteristic impedance impact the calculation of forward and reverse pressure in a number of test cavities with dimensions chosen to reflect human ear-canal dimensions. Results demonstrate that FPL calibration, which has already been shown to be more accurate than in situ SPL calibration, can be improved particularly around standing-wave null frequencies by refining estimates of characteristic impedance. Better estimates allow FPL to be accurately calculated at least through 10 kHz using a variety of probe tips in test cavities of different sizes, suggesting that FPL calibration can be performed in ear canals of all sizes. Additionally, FPL calibration appears a reasonable option when quantifying the levels of extended high-frequency (10-18 kHz) stimuli.",
author = "Scheperle, {Rachel A.} and Goodman, {Shawn S.} and Neely, {Stephen T.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.3655878",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "3882--3892",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "6",

}

Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration. / Scheperle, Rachel A.; Goodman, Shawn S.; Neely, Stephen T.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 130, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 3882-3892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration

AU - Scheperle, Rachel A.

AU - Goodman, Shawn S.

AU - Neely, Stephen T.

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Quantifying ear-canal sound level in forward pressure has been suggested as a more accurate and practical alternative to sound pressure level (SPL) calibrations used in clinical settings. The mathematical isolation of forward (and reverse) pressure requires defining the Thvenin-equivalent impedance and pressure of the sound source and characteristic impedance of the load; however, the extent to which inaccuracies in characterizing the source and/or load impact forward pressure level (FPL) calibrations has not been specifically evaluated. This study examined how commercially available probe tips and estimates of characteristic impedance impact the calculation of forward and reverse pressure in a number of test cavities with dimensions chosen to reflect human ear-canal dimensions. Results demonstrate that FPL calibration, which has already been shown to be more accurate than in situ SPL calibration, can be improved particularly around standing-wave null frequencies by refining estimates of characteristic impedance. Better estimates allow FPL to be accurately calculated at least through 10 kHz using a variety of probe tips in test cavities of different sizes, suggesting that FPL calibration can be performed in ear canals of all sizes. Additionally, FPL calibration appears a reasonable option when quantifying the levels of extended high-frequency (10-18 kHz) stimuli.

AB - Quantifying ear-canal sound level in forward pressure has been suggested as a more accurate and practical alternative to sound pressure level (SPL) calibrations used in clinical settings. The mathematical isolation of forward (and reverse) pressure requires defining the Thvenin-equivalent impedance and pressure of the sound source and characteristic impedance of the load; however, the extent to which inaccuracies in characterizing the source and/or load impact forward pressure level (FPL) calibrations has not been specifically evaluated. This study examined how commercially available probe tips and estimates of characteristic impedance impact the calculation of forward and reverse pressure in a number of test cavities with dimensions chosen to reflect human ear-canal dimensions. Results demonstrate that FPL calibration, which has already been shown to be more accurate than in situ SPL calibration, can be improved particularly around standing-wave null frequencies by refining estimates of characteristic impedance. Better estimates allow FPL to be accurately calculated at least through 10 kHz using a variety of probe tips in test cavities of different sizes, suggesting that FPL calibration can be performed in ear canals of all sizes. Additionally, FPL calibration appears a reasonable option when quantifying the levels of extended high-frequency (10-18 kHz) stimuli.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858328282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.3655878

DO - 10.1121/1.3655878

M3 - Article

C2 - 22225044

AN - SCOPUS:84858328282

VL - 130

SP - 3882

EP - 3892

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 6

ER -