Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models

H Mark Hubey

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The software Life Cycle Models due to Putnam and Parr model the software development efforts at almost the extreme ends of the spectrum in terms of difficulty. The Parr model seems to imply that every software effort is a brand new experience and no lessons learned in past experiences can be used beneficially. The Putnam model seems to imply that every software effort is (almost) essentially the same in that there is always some learning involved and that this learning is always linear. In addition, the Putnam model does not take into account the requirements and the feasibility and planning stages of the lifecycle. Parr has objected to this and thinks that all exploratory work pertaining to the project such as 'design studies, requirements analysis or research projects aimed at specific aspects of the task to be attempted' must be accounted for in the model. This paper explores the software development effort with several differential equation models. In these models whether the modeler incorporates the planning and specification stages into the model is left up to the modeler as a 'matter of taste.' Additionally, the 'inherent difficulty' of the software development project is taken into account with the parameters of the models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages1915-1920
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1990
EventProceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5) - Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Duration: 3 May 19904 May 1990

Other

OtherProceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5)
CityPittsburgh, PA, USA
Period3/05/904/05/90

Fingerprint

Software engineering
Planning
Life cycle
Differential equations
Specifications

Cite this

Hubey, H. M. (1990). Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models. 1915-1920. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, .
Hubey, H Mark. / Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, .6 p.
@conference{b94e654c846547cb90675b58e891e3ad,
title = "Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models",
abstract = "The software Life Cycle Models due to Putnam and Parr model the software development efforts at almost the extreme ends of the spectrum in terms of difficulty. The Parr model seems to imply that every software effort is a brand new experience and no lessons learned in past experiences can be used beneficially. The Putnam model seems to imply that every software effort is (almost) essentially the same in that there is always some learning involved and that this learning is always linear. In addition, the Putnam model does not take into account the requirements and the feasibility and planning stages of the lifecycle. Parr has objected to this and thinks that all exploratory work pertaining to the project such as 'design studies, requirements analysis or research projects aimed at specific aspects of the task to be attempted' must be accounted for in the model. This paper explores the software development effort with several differential equation models. In these models whether the modeler incorporates the planning and specification stages into the model is left up to the modeler as a 'matter of taste.' Additionally, the 'inherent difficulty' of the software development project is taken into account with the parameters of the models.",
author = "Hubey, {H Mark}",
year = "1990",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "1915--1920",
note = "null ; Conference date: 03-05-1990 Through 04-05-1990",

}

Hubey, HM 1990, 'Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models' Paper presented at Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3/05/90 - 4/05/90, pp. 1915-1920.

Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models. / Hubey, H Mark.

1990. 1915-1920 Paper presented at Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models

AU - Hubey, H Mark

PY - 1990/12/1

Y1 - 1990/12/1

N2 - The software Life Cycle Models due to Putnam and Parr model the software development efforts at almost the extreme ends of the spectrum in terms of difficulty. The Parr model seems to imply that every software effort is a brand new experience and no lessons learned in past experiences can be used beneficially. The Putnam model seems to imply that every software effort is (almost) essentially the same in that there is always some learning involved and that this learning is always linear. In addition, the Putnam model does not take into account the requirements and the feasibility and planning stages of the lifecycle. Parr has objected to this and thinks that all exploratory work pertaining to the project such as 'design studies, requirements analysis or research projects aimed at specific aspects of the task to be attempted' must be accounted for in the model. This paper explores the software development effort with several differential equation models. In these models whether the modeler incorporates the planning and specification stages into the model is left up to the modeler as a 'matter of taste.' Additionally, the 'inherent difficulty' of the software development project is taken into account with the parameters of the models.

AB - The software Life Cycle Models due to Putnam and Parr model the software development efforts at almost the extreme ends of the spectrum in terms of difficulty. The Parr model seems to imply that every software effort is a brand new experience and no lessons learned in past experiences can be used beneficially. The Putnam model seems to imply that every software effort is (almost) essentially the same in that there is always some learning involved and that this learning is always linear. In addition, the Putnam model does not take into account the requirements and the feasibility and planning stages of the lifecycle. Parr has objected to this and thinks that all exploratory work pertaining to the project such as 'design studies, requirements analysis or research projects aimed at specific aspects of the task to be attempted' must be accounted for in the model. This paper explores the software development effort with several differential equation models. In these models whether the modeler incorporates the planning and specification stages into the model is left up to the modeler as a 'matter of taste.' Additionally, the 'inherent difficulty' of the software development project is taken into account with the parameters of the models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025550658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:0025550658

SP - 1915

EP - 1920

ER -

Hubey HM. Generalized Putnam-Parr software lifecycle models. 1990. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Pittsburgh Conference Part 4 (of 5), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, .