Give me a formula not the concept! student preference to mathematical problem solving

Manveer Mann, Mary C. Enderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to assess student preference for procedural (formula-driven) versus conceptual (concept-driven) approaches to solve mathematical problems. Additionally, we evaluated differences in preferences among students who performed above average and those who performed at or below average on simple arithmetic problems. Methods/Design and Sample: We used a single-factor (Instructional Approach: conceptual vs. procedural) between-subjects experiment. Instructional approach was manipulated using short embedded instructional videos. Students evaluated each approach on a five-point scale. Results: We found that students (above-average and average/below-average) preferred the procedural approach to the conceptual approach. Interestingly, however, although students preferred the procedural approach when first introduced to it, above-average students evaluated the conceptual approach more positively if they were unable to solve a problem correctly and were presented with additional conceptual instruction. On the other hand, there was no change in the evaluation of the procedural approach. Value to Marketing Educators: The findings of this study indicate that students develop mathematical knowledge and understanding differently. Faculty who teach courses with a high degree of mathematics concepts should work to provide multiple experiences that include both procedural and conceptual techniques to develop a holistic understanding of mathematics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-24
Number of pages10
JournalJournal for Advancement of Marketing Education
Volume25
Issue numberSpecial Issue
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

student
mathematics
Problem solving
marketing
video
educator
instruction
experiment
evaluation
Values
experience
Mathematics

Keywords

  • Conceptual knowledge
  • Critical thinking
  • Mathematics
  • Problem solving
  • Procedural knowledge

Cite this

@article{b2d34751f90f4842aed17cd182e24864,
title = "Give me a formula not the concept! student preference to mathematical problem solving",
abstract = "Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to assess student preference for procedural (formula-driven) versus conceptual (concept-driven) approaches to solve mathematical problems. Additionally, we evaluated differences in preferences among students who performed above average and those who performed at or below average on simple arithmetic problems. Methods/Design and Sample: We used a single-factor (Instructional Approach: conceptual vs. procedural) between-subjects experiment. Instructional approach was manipulated using short embedded instructional videos. Students evaluated each approach on a five-point scale. Results: We found that students (above-average and average/below-average) preferred the procedural approach to the conceptual approach. Interestingly, however, although students preferred the procedural approach when first introduced to it, above-average students evaluated the conceptual approach more positively if they were unable to solve a problem correctly and were presented with additional conceptual instruction. On the other hand, there was no change in the evaluation of the procedural approach. Value to Marketing Educators: The findings of this study indicate that students develop mathematical knowledge and understanding differently. Faculty who teach courses with a high degree of mathematics concepts should work to provide multiple experiences that include both procedural and conceptual techniques to develop a holistic understanding of mathematics.",
keywords = "Conceptual knowledge, Critical thinking, Mathematics, Problem solving, Procedural knowledge",
author = "Manveer Mann and Enderson, {Mary C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "15--24",
journal = "Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education",
issn = "1537-5137",
publisher = "Marketing Management Association",
number = "Special Issue",

}

Give me a formula not the concept! student preference to mathematical problem solving. / Mann, Manveer; Enderson, Mary C.

In: Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, Vol. 25, No. Special Issue, 01.01.2017, p. 15-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Give me a formula not the concept! student preference to mathematical problem solving

AU - Mann, Manveer

AU - Enderson, Mary C.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to assess student preference for procedural (formula-driven) versus conceptual (concept-driven) approaches to solve mathematical problems. Additionally, we evaluated differences in preferences among students who performed above average and those who performed at or below average on simple arithmetic problems. Methods/Design and Sample: We used a single-factor (Instructional Approach: conceptual vs. procedural) between-subjects experiment. Instructional approach was manipulated using short embedded instructional videos. Students evaluated each approach on a five-point scale. Results: We found that students (above-average and average/below-average) preferred the procedural approach to the conceptual approach. Interestingly, however, although students preferred the procedural approach when first introduced to it, above-average students evaluated the conceptual approach more positively if they were unable to solve a problem correctly and were presented with additional conceptual instruction. On the other hand, there was no change in the evaluation of the procedural approach. Value to Marketing Educators: The findings of this study indicate that students develop mathematical knowledge and understanding differently. Faculty who teach courses with a high degree of mathematics concepts should work to provide multiple experiences that include both procedural and conceptual techniques to develop a holistic understanding of mathematics.

AB - Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to assess student preference for procedural (formula-driven) versus conceptual (concept-driven) approaches to solve mathematical problems. Additionally, we evaluated differences in preferences among students who performed above average and those who performed at or below average on simple arithmetic problems. Methods/Design and Sample: We used a single-factor (Instructional Approach: conceptual vs. procedural) between-subjects experiment. Instructional approach was manipulated using short embedded instructional videos. Students evaluated each approach on a five-point scale. Results: We found that students (above-average and average/below-average) preferred the procedural approach to the conceptual approach. Interestingly, however, although students preferred the procedural approach when first introduced to it, above-average students evaluated the conceptual approach more positively if they were unable to solve a problem correctly and were presented with additional conceptual instruction. On the other hand, there was no change in the evaluation of the procedural approach. Value to Marketing Educators: The findings of this study indicate that students develop mathematical knowledge and understanding differently. Faculty who teach courses with a high degree of mathematics concepts should work to provide multiple experiences that include both procedural and conceptual techniques to develop a holistic understanding of mathematics.

KW - Conceptual knowledge

KW - Critical thinking

KW - Mathematics

KW - Problem solving

KW - Procedural knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020105224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020105224

VL - 25

SP - 15

EP - 24

JO - Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education

JF - Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education

SN - 1537-5137

IS - Special Issue

ER -