History to prehistory

An archaeology of being Indian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores a conception of being Indian in New Orleans that complicates and localizes Indian histories and identities. It poses that the notion of "being Indian" may be approached not only through the history and archaeology of persons but also as an identity such that being Indian itself is an artifact produced by a wide range of people in the development of New Orleans in the colonial and post-colonial periods. Employing a critical reading of intercultural relations, I explore archaeological evidence that suggests colonial New Orleans was created in both Indian and non-Indian terms through exchange. In this process archaeology shows that being Indian was part of a widely-shared colonial strategy that places a fluid Indian identity at the center of local history. The paper also considers how the marginalization of Indian people in the early nineteenth century was one way New Orleans and the greater southeast connected with dominant American sensibilities. Developing with the idea of "prehistory," nineteenth-century Native Americans were distanced as a cultural other and pushed to margins of New Orleans society. The subsequent internal tensions of assimilation and removal derailed Indian challenges to White domination they had employed over the previous 100 years. As this action coincides with the invention of American archaeology as the science of prehistory, the paper concludes with a critical reflection on archaeological terminology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-295
Number of pages25
JournalArchaeologies
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Prehistory
History
Archaeology
Colonies
Intercultural Relations
Southeast
Sensibility
American Archaeology
Archaeological Evidence
Conception
Native Americans
Person
Local History
Critical Reflection
Artifact
Domination
Marginalization
Indian History
Invention
Colonial Period

Keywords

  • Archaeology
  • Identity
  • Native American
  • New Orleans
  • Prehistory

Cite this

@article{101f4a2da90d48159e78b3f118406bfa,
title = "History to prehistory: An archaeology of being Indian",
abstract = "This paper explores a conception of being Indian in New Orleans that complicates and localizes Indian histories and identities. It poses that the notion of {"}being Indian{"} may be approached not only through the history and archaeology of persons but also as an identity such that being Indian itself is an artifact produced by a wide range of people in the development of New Orleans in the colonial and post-colonial periods. Employing a critical reading of intercultural relations, I explore archaeological evidence that suggests colonial New Orleans was created in both Indian and non-Indian terms through exchange. In this process archaeology shows that being Indian was part of a widely-shared colonial strategy that places a fluid Indian identity at the center of local history. The paper also considers how the marginalization of Indian people in the early nineteenth century was one way New Orleans and the greater southeast connected with dominant American sensibilities. Developing with the idea of {"}prehistory,{"} nineteenth-century Native Americans were distanced as a cultural other and pushed to margins of New Orleans society. The subsequent internal tensions of assimilation and removal derailed Indian challenges to White domination they had employed over the previous 100 years. As this action coincides with the invention of American archaeology as the science of prehistory, the paper concludes with a critical reflection on archaeological terminology.",
keywords = "Archaeology, Identity, Native American, New Orleans, Prehistory",
author = "Christopher Matthews",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11759-007-9024-x",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "271--295",
journal = "Archaeologies",
issn = "1555-8622",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

History to prehistory : An archaeology of being Indian. / Matthews, Christopher.

In: Archaeologies, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.12.2007, p. 271-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - History to prehistory

T2 - An archaeology of being Indian

AU - Matthews, Christopher

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - This paper explores a conception of being Indian in New Orleans that complicates and localizes Indian histories and identities. It poses that the notion of "being Indian" may be approached not only through the history and archaeology of persons but also as an identity such that being Indian itself is an artifact produced by a wide range of people in the development of New Orleans in the colonial and post-colonial periods. Employing a critical reading of intercultural relations, I explore archaeological evidence that suggests colonial New Orleans was created in both Indian and non-Indian terms through exchange. In this process archaeology shows that being Indian was part of a widely-shared colonial strategy that places a fluid Indian identity at the center of local history. The paper also considers how the marginalization of Indian people in the early nineteenth century was one way New Orleans and the greater southeast connected with dominant American sensibilities. Developing with the idea of "prehistory," nineteenth-century Native Americans were distanced as a cultural other and pushed to margins of New Orleans society. The subsequent internal tensions of assimilation and removal derailed Indian challenges to White domination they had employed over the previous 100 years. As this action coincides with the invention of American archaeology as the science of prehistory, the paper concludes with a critical reflection on archaeological terminology.

AB - This paper explores a conception of being Indian in New Orleans that complicates and localizes Indian histories and identities. It poses that the notion of "being Indian" may be approached not only through the history and archaeology of persons but also as an identity such that being Indian itself is an artifact produced by a wide range of people in the development of New Orleans in the colonial and post-colonial periods. Employing a critical reading of intercultural relations, I explore archaeological evidence that suggests colonial New Orleans was created in both Indian and non-Indian terms through exchange. In this process archaeology shows that being Indian was part of a widely-shared colonial strategy that places a fluid Indian identity at the center of local history. The paper also considers how the marginalization of Indian people in the early nineteenth century was one way New Orleans and the greater southeast connected with dominant American sensibilities. Developing with the idea of "prehistory," nineteenth-century Native Americans were distanced as a cultural other and pushed to margins of New Orleans society. The subsequent internal tensions of assimilation and removal derailed Indian challenges to White domination they had employed over the previous 100 years. As this action coincides with the invention of American archaeology as the science of prehistory, the paper concludes with a critical reflection on archaeological terminology.

KW - Archaeology

KW - Identity

KW - Native American

KW - New Orleans

KW - Prehistory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42349111258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11759-007-9024-x

DO - 10.1007/s11759-007-9024-x

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 271

EP - 295

JO - Archaeologies

JF - Archaeologies

SN - 1555-8622

IS - 3

ER -