How Does the Negative Impact of an Athlete’s Reputational Crisis Spill Over to Endorsed and Competing Brands? The Moderating Effects of Consumer Knowledge

Shintaro Sato, Yong Jae Ko, Yonghwan Chang, Mark Kay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite some of the recent examinations of an athlete’s reputational crisis (ARC), their negative spillover effects on endorsed and competing brands have been overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between perceived severity, athlete endorser credibility (i.e., incompetence, untrustworthiness), and attitudes towards endorsed and competing brands. To enhance theoretical understanding of the phenomenon, the moderating role of consumer knowledge was also tested. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 339). A multigroup structural equation model was employed to test the hypothesized model. Results indicated that the severity of an ARC is associated with the perceived incompetence and untrustworthiness of focal athletes. Perceived incompetence is associated with negative evaluation of an endorsed brand. Furthermore, this impact is significantly stronger for consumers with greater knowledge of the athletes than those who are less knowledgeable. Interestingly, competitor brands received negative impact indirectly from the athlete endorsers’ incompetence. This spillover effect is also manifested differently depending on the level of consumer knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-409
Number of pages25
JournalCommunication and Sport
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Hazardous materials spills
athlete
Turk
structural model
credibility
examination
evaluation

Keywords

  • athlete transgression
  • consumer knowledge
  • endorsement
  • memory
  • negative publicity

Cite this

@article{53728d88f7bc40b0b06b1c5fc600d5d6,
title = "How Does the Negative Impact of an Athlete’s Reputational Crisis Spill Over to Endorsed and Competing Brands? The Moderating Effects of Consumer Knowledge",
abstract = "Despite some of the recent examinations of an athlete’s reputational crisis (ARC), their negative spillover effects on endorsed and competing brands have been overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between perceived severity, athlete endorser credibility (i.e., incompetence, untrustworthiness), and attitudes towards endorsed and competing brands. To enhance theoretical understanding of the phenomenon, the moderating role of consumer knowledge was also tested. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 339). A multigroup structural equation model was employed to test the hypothesized model. Results indicated that the severity of an ARC is associated with the perceived incompetence and untrustworthiness of focal athletes. Perceived incompetence is associated with negative evaluation of an endorsed brand. Furthermore, this impact is significantly stronger for consumers with greater knowledge of the athletes than those who are less knowledgeable. Interestingly, competitor brands received negative impact indirectly from the athlete endorsers’ incompetence. This spillover effect is also manifested differently depending on the level of consumer knowledge.",
keywords = "athlete transgression, consumer knowledge, endorsement, memory, negative publicity",
author = "Shintaro Sato and Ko, {Yong Jae} and Yonghwan Chang and Mark Kay",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2167479518783461",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "385--409",
journal = "Communication and Sport",
issn = "2167-4795",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

How Does the Negative Impact of an Athlete’s Reputational Crisis Spill Over to Endorsed and Competing Brands? The Moderating Effects of Consumer Knowledge. / Sato, Shintaro; Ko, Yong Jae; Chang, Yonghwan; Kay, Mark.

In: Communication and Sport, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.06.2019, p. 385-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Does the Negative Impact of an Athlete’s Reputational Crisis Spill Over to Endorsed and Competing Brands? The Moderating Effects of Consumer Knowledge

AU - Sato, Shintaro

AU - Ko, Yong Jae

AU - Chang, Yonghwan

AU - Kay, Mark

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Despite some of the recent examinations of an athlete’s reputational crisis (ARC), their negative spillover effects on endorsed and competing brands have been overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between perceived severity, athlete endorser credibility (i.e., incompetence, untrustworthiness), and attitudes towards endorsed and competing brands. To enhance theoretical understanding of the phenomenon, the moderating role of consumer knowledge was also tested. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 339). A multigroup structural equation model was employed to test the hypothesized model. Results indicated that the severity of an ARC is associated with the perceived incompetence and untrustworthiness of focal athletes. Perceived incompetence is associated with negative evaluation of an endorsed brand. Furthermore, this impact is significantly stronger for consumers with greater knowledge of the athletes than those who are less knowledgeable. Interestingly, competitor brands received negative impact indirectly from the athlete endorsers’ incompetence. This spillover effect is also manifested differently depending on the level of consumer knowledge.

AB - Despite some of the recent examinations of an athlete’s reputational crisis (ARC), their negative spillover effects on endorsed and competing brands have been overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between perceived severity, athlete endorser credibility (i.e., incompetence, untrustworthiness), and attitudes towards endorsed and competing brands. To enhance theoretical understanding of the phenomenon, the moderating role of consumer knowledge was also tested. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 339). A multigroup structural equation model was employed to test the hypothesized model. Results indicated that the severity of an ARC is associated with the perceived incompetence and untrustworthiness of focal athletes. Perceived incompetence is associated with negative evaluation of an endorsed brand. Furthermore, this impact is significantly stronger for consumers with greater knowledge of the athletes than those who are less knowledgeable. Interestingly, competitor brands received negative impact indirectly from the athlete endorsers’ incompetence. This spillover effect is also manifested differently depending on the level of consumer knowledge.

KW - athlete transgression

KW - consumer knowledge

KW - endorsement

KW - memory

KW - negative publicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049627326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2167479518783461

DO - 10.1177/2167479518783461

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 385

EP - 409

JO - Communication and Sport

JF - Communication and Sport

SN - 2167-4795

IS - 3

ER -