How money matters for young children's development: Parental investment and family processes

W. Jean Yeung, Miriam R. Linver, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

564 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its 1997 Child Development Supplement to examine how family income matters for young children's development. The sample included 753 children who were between ages 3 and 5 years in 1997. Two sets of mediating factors were examined that reflect two dominating views in the literature: (1) the investment perspective, and (2) the family process perspective. The study examined how two measures of income (stability and level) were associated with preschool children's developmental outcomes (Woodcock-Johnson [W-J] Achievement Test scores and the Behavior Problem Index [BPI]) through investment and family process pathways. Results supported the hypothesis that distinct mediating mechanisms operate on the association between income and different child outcomes. Much of the association between income and children's W-J scores was mediated by the family's ability to invest in providing a stimulating learning environment. In contrast, family income was associated with children's BPI scores primarily through maternal emotional distress and parenting practices. Level of income was associated with W-J letter-word scores and income stability was associated with W-J applied problem scores and BPI, even after all controls were included in the models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1861-1879
Number of pages19
JournalChild Development
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2002

Fingerprint

Child Development
money
income
family income
achievement test
preschool child
Aptitude
supplement
Parenting
Child Behavior
learning environment
Preschool Children
Mothers
ability
Learning

Cite this

@article{098a39620d2e452184f6dca4f71f5a45,
title = "How money matters for young children's development: Parental investment and family processes",
abstract = "This study used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its 1997 Child Development Supplement to examine how family income matters for young children's development. The sample included 753 children who were between ages 3 and 5 years in 1997. Two sets of mediating factors were examined that reflect two dominating views in the literature: (1) the investment perspective, and (2) the family process perspective. The study examined how two measures of income (stability and level) were associated with preschool children's developmental outcomes (Woodcock-Johnson [W-J] Achievement Test scores and the Behavior Problem Index [BPI]) through investment and family process pathways. Results supported the hypothesis that distinct mediating mechanisms operate on the association between income and different child outcomes. Much of the association between income and children's W-J scores was mediated by the family's ability to invest in providing a stimulating learning environment. In contrast, family income was associated with children's BPI scores primarily through maternal emotional distress and parenting practices. Level of income was associated with W-J letter-word scores and income stability was associated with W-J applied problem scores and BPI, even after all controls were included in the models.",
author = "Yeung, {W. Jean} and Linver, {Miriam R.} and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00511",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "1861--1879",
journal = "Child development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

How money matters for young children's development : Parental investment and family processes. / Yeung, W. Jean; Linver, Miriam R.; Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne.

In: Child Development, Vol. 73, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 1861-1879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How money matters for young children's development

T2 - Parental investment and family processes

AU - Yeung, W. Jean

AU - Linver, Miriam R.

AU - Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - This study used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its 1997 Child Development Supplement to examine how family income matters for young children's development. The sample included 753 children who were between ages 3 and 5 years in 1997. Two sets of mediating factors were examined that reflect two dominating views in the literature: (1) the investment perspective, and (2) the family process perspective. The study examined how two measures of income (stability and level) were associated with preschool children's developmental outcomes (Woodcock-Johnson [W-J] Achievement Test scores and the Behavior Problem Index [BPI]) through investment and family process pathways. Results supported the hypothesis that distinct mediating mechanisms operate on the association between income and different child outcomes. Much of the association between income and children's W-J scores was mediated by the family's ability to invest in providing a stimulating learning environment. In contrast, family income was associated with children's BPI scores primarily through maternal emotional distress and parenting practices. Level of income was associated with W-J letter-word scores and income stability was associated with W-J applied problem scores and BPI, even after all controls were included in the models.

AB - This study used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its 1997 Child Development Supplement to examine how family income matters for young children's development. The sample included 753 children who were between ages 3 and 5 years in 1997. Two sets of mediating factors were examined that reflect two dominating views in the literature: (1) the investment perspective, and (2) the family process perspective. The study examined how two measures of income (stability and level) were associated with preschool children's developmental outcomes (Woodcock-Johnson [W-J] Achievement Test scores and the Behavior Problem Index [BPI]) through investment and family process pathways. Results supported the hypothesis that distinct mediating mechanisms operate on the association between income and different child outcomes. Much of the association between income and children's W-J scores was mediated by the family's ability to invest in providing a stimulating learning environment. In contrast, family income was associated with children's BPI scores primarily through maternal emotional distress and parenting practices. Level of income was associated with W-J letter-word scores and income stability was associated with W-J applied problem scores and BPI, even after all controls were included in the models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036835011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00511

DO - 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00511

M3 - Article

C2 - 12487499

AN - SCOPUS:0036835011

VL - 73

SP - 1861

EP - 1879

JO - Child development

JF - Child development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 6

ER -