Howard J. Wiarda: Post-script

Esther Skelley Jordan, Tony Spanakos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay concludes the symposium by considering Howard J. Wiarda’s topical scholarship on grand theory, corporatism, democratization, and development, in addition to his regional scholarship, which focused on Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian politics but also touched on every other major region of the world, including U.S. politics and foreign policy making. We seek to makes sense of the tensions in Wiarda’s work, especially between his critiques of theoretical determinism and ethnocentrism on the one hand and his continual emphasis on cultural and corporatist explanations of comparative politics, on the other. We argue that he made significant contributions to the field through his service as a public intellectual, mobilization of multiple theoretical perspectives, use of inductive methods, provocative interpretations of comparative politics throughout the world, and accessibility to students and policy makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-704
Number of pages8
JournalPolity
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

politics
corporatism
ethnocentrism
determinism
intellectual
democratization
foreign policy
mobilization
interpretation
student

Keywords

  • Corporatism
  • Ethnocentrism
  • Grand theory
  • Howard J. Wiarda
  • Latin American politics
  • U.S. foreign policy

Cite this

Jordan, Esther Skelley ; Spanakos, Tony. / Howard J. Wiarda : Post-script. In: Polity. 2018 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 697-704.
@article{5ddb87bbb63b48f28a88906e514b0bef,
title = "Howard J. Wiarda: Post-script",
abstract = "This essay concludes the symposium by considering Howard J. Wiarda’s topical scholarship on grand theory, corporatism, democratization, and development, in addition to his regional scholarship, which focused on Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian politics but also touched on every other major region of the world, including U.S. politics and foreign policy making. We seek to makes sense of the tensions in Wiarda’s work, especially between his critiques of theoretical determinism and ethnocentrism on the one hand and his continual emphasis on cultural and corporatist explanations of comparative politics, on the other. We argue that he made significant contributions to the field through his service as a public intellectual, mobilization of multiple theoretical perspectives, use of inductive methods, provocative interpretations of comparative politics throughout the world, and accessibility to students and policy makers.",
keywords = "Corporatism, Ethnocentrism, Grand theory, Howard J. Wiarda, Latin American politics, U.S. foreign policy",
author = "Jordan, {Esther Skelley} and Tony Spanakos",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/699639",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "697--704",
journal = "Polity",
issn = "0032-3497",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "4",

}

Howard J. Wiarda : Post-script. / Jordan, Esther Skelley; Spanakos, Tony.

In: Polity, Vol. 50, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 697-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Howard J. Wiarda

T2 - Post-script

AU - Jordan, Esther Skelley

AU - Spanakos, Tony

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - This essay concludes the symposium by considering Howard J. Wiarda’s topical scholarship on grand theory, corporatism, democratization, and development, in addition to his regional scholarship, which focused on Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian politics but also touched on every other major region of the world, including U.S. politics and foreign policy making. We seek to makes sense of the tensions in Wiarda’s work, especially between his critiques of theoretical determinism and ethnocentrism on the one hand and his continual emphasis on cultural and corporatist explanations of comparative politics, on the other. We argue that he made significant contributions to the field through his service as a public intellectual, mobilization of multiple theoretical perspectives, use of inductive methods, provocative interpretations of comparative politics throughout the world, and accessibility to students and policy makers.

AB - This essay concludes the symposium by considering Howard J. Wiarda’s topical scholarship on grand theory, corporatism, democratization, and development, in addition to his regional scholarship, which focused on Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian politics but also touched on every other major region of the world, including U.S. politics and foreign policy making. We seek to makes sense of the tensions in Wiarda’s work, especially between his critiques of theoretical determinism and ethnocentrism on the one hand and his continual emphasis on cultural and corporatist explanations of comparative politics, on the other. We argue that he made significant contributions to the field through his service as a public intellectual, mobilization of multiple theoretical perspectives, use of inductive methods, provocative interpretations of comparative politics throughout the world, and accessibility to students and policy makers.

KW - Corporatism

KW - Ethnocentrism

KW - Grand theory

KW - Howard J. Wiarda

KW - Latin American politics

KW - U.S. foreign policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055019598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/699639

DO - 10.1086/699639

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055019598

VL - 50

SP - 697

EP - 704

JO - Polity

JF - Polity

SN - 0032-3497

IS - 4

ER -