TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech
AU - Tardif, Monique
AU - Berti, Larissa Cristina
AU - Marino, Viviane Cristina De Castro
AU - Pardo, Jennifer
AU - Bressmann, Tim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.
AB - Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.
KW - Auditory-perceptual evaluations
KW - Hypernasality
KW - Instrumental measures
KW - Intonation
KW - Perception of speech
KW - Ratings of speech
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053162664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000492385
DO - 10.1159/000492385
M3 - Article
C2 - 30184539
AN - SCOPUS:85053162664
SN - 1021-7762
VL - 70
SP - 183
EP - 190
JO - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
JF - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
IS - 3-4
ER -