Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech

Monique Tardif, Larissa Cristina Berti, Viviane Cristina De Castro Marino, Jennifer Pardo, Tim Bressmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-190
Number of pages8
JournalFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Volume70
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Phonetics
Visual Analog Scale
Nose
Analysis of Variance
listener
stimulus
rating
Intonation
Research
simulation
interaction
evaluation
Hearing
Evaluation
Fundamental Frequency
Sound
Listeners
Rating
Interaction
Stimulus

Keywords

  • Auditory-perceptual evaluations
  • Hypernasality
  • Instrumental measures
  • Intonation
  • Perception of speech
  • Ratings of speech

Cite this

Tardif, Monique ; Berti, Larissa Cristina ; Marino, Viviane Cristina De Castro ; Pardo, Jennifer ; Bressmann, Tim. / Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech. In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2018 ; Vol. 70, No. 3-4. pp. 183-190.
@article{1114cd19343e41e3a3f8c936eebf96af,
title = "Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.",
keywords = "Auditory-perceptual evaluations, Hypernasality, Instrumental measures, Intonation, Perception of speech, Ratings of speech",
author = "Monique Tardif and Berti, {Larissa Cristina} and Marino, {Viviane Cristina De Castro} and Jennifer Pardo and Tim Bressmann",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000492385",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "183--190",
journal = "Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica",
issn = "1021-7762",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "3-4",

}

Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech. / Tardif, Monique; Berti, Larissa Cristina; Marino, Viviane Cristina De Castro; Pardo, Jennifer; Bressmann, Tim.

In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, Vol. 70, No. 3-4, 01.10.2018, p. 183-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech

AU - Tardif, Monique

AU - Berti, Larissa Cristina

AU - Marino, Viviane Cristina De Castro

AU - Pardo, Jennifer

AU - Bressmann, Tim

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.

AB - Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.

KW - Auditory-perceptual evaluations

KW - Hypernasality

KW - Instrumental measures

KW - Intonation

KW - Perception of speech

KW - Ratings of speech

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053162664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000492385

DO - 10.1159/000492385

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 183

EP - 190

JO - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

JF - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

SN - 1021-7762

IS - 3-4

ER -