Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech

Monique Tardif, Larissa Cristina Berti, Viviane Cristina De Castro Marino, Jennifer Pardo, Tim Bressmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Anecdotal clinical reports have stated that hypernasal speech sounds monotonous. However, the relationship between the perception of intonation (i.e., the fundamental frequency variation across an utterance) and hypernasality (excessive nasal resonance during the production of non-nasal sounds) has not been investigated in research. We hypothesized that auditory-perceptual ratings of intonation would be significantly lower for more hypernasal stimuli. Methods: One male and one female voice actor simulated 3 levels of intonation (monotone, normal, and exaggerated) at 4 different levels of hypernasality (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Thirty participants listened to the simulations and rated the intonation on a visual analogue scale from 0 (monotone) to 100 (exaggerated). Results: A mixed-effects ANOVA revealed main effects of intonation (F2 = 236.46, p < 0.001), and hypernasality (F3 = 159.89, p < 0.001), as well as an interaction between the two (F6 = 28.35, p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses found that speech was rated as more monotonous as hypernasality increased. Summary/Implications: The presence of hypernasality in speech can lead listeners to perceive speech as more monotonous. Instrumental measures should be used to corroborate auditory-perceptual evaluations of speech features like intonation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-190
Number of pages8
JournalFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Volume70
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Auditory-perceptual evaluations
  • Hypernasality
  • Instrumental measures
  • Intonation
  • Perception of speech
  • Ratings of speech

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this