Image Quality and the Aesthetic Judgment of Photographs

Contrast, Sharpness, and Grain Teased Apart and Put Together

Pablo Tinio, Helmut Leder, Marlies Strasser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the individual and combined effects of contrast, sharpness, and grain degradations on the aesthetic judgments of photographs depicting natural and human-made scenes. Our systematic approach demonstrated that certain degradations, and their combinations, had more impact on aesthetic judgments than others, and that the effects varied depending on the type of scene. We also showed that the degradations were additive in that the more degradations to which an image was subjected, the less it was liked. Finally, we found evidence for a contrast effect in which the aesthetic judgments of high-quality images were more positive as the images they were presented with were more degraded.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-176
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2011

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Image Quality
Aesthetic Judgment
Degradation

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Image manipulation
  • Image quality
  • Photography

Cite this

@article{c9f1be9164fa4e4da8c20da0ed0baead,
title = "Image Quality and the Aesthetic Judgment of Photographs: Contrast, Sharpness, and Grain Teased Apart and Put Together",
abstract = "We examined the individual and combined effects of contrast, sharpness, and grain degradations on the aesthetic judgments of photographs depicting natural and human-made scenes. Our systematic approach demonstrated that certain degradations, and their combinations, had more impact on aesthetic judgments than others, and that the effects varied depending on the type of scene. We also showed that the degradations were additive in that the more degradations to which an image was subjected, the less it was liked. Finally, we found evidence for a contrast effect in which the aesthetic judgments of high-quality images were more positive as the images they were presented with were more degraded.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Image manipulation, Image quality, Photography",
author = "Pablo Tinio and Helmut Leder and Marlies Strasser",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0019542",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "165--176",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Image Quality and the Aesthetic Judgment of Photographs : Contrast, Sharpness, and Grain Teased Apart and Put Together. / Tinio, Pablo; Leder, Helmut; Strasser, Marlies.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.05.2011, p. 165-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image Quality and the Aesthetic Judgment of Photographs

T2 - Contrast, Sharpness, and Grain Teased Apart and Put Together

AU - Tinio, Pablo

AU - Leder, Helmut

AU - Strasser, Marlies

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - We examined the individual and combined effects of contrast, sharpness, and grain degradations on the aesthetic judgments of photographs depicting natural and human-made scenes. Our systematic approach demonstrated that certain degradations, and their combinations, had more impact on aesthetic judgments than others, and that the effects varied depending on the type of scene. We also showed that the degradations were additive in that the more degradations to which an image was subjected, the less it was liked. Finally, we found evidence for a contrast effect in which the aesthetic judgments of high-quality images were more positive as the images they were presented with were more degraded.

AB - We examined the individual and combined effects of contrast, sharpness, and grain degradations on the aesthetic judgments of photographs depicting natural and human-made scenes. Our systematic approach demonstrated that certain degradations, and their combinations, had more impact on aesthetic judgments than others, and that the effects varied depending on the type of scene. We also showed that the degradations were additive in that the more degradations to which an image was subjected, the less it was liked. Finally, we found evidence for a contrast effect in which the aesthetic judgments of high-quality images were more positive as the images they were presented with were more degraded.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Image manipulation

KW - Image quality

KW - Photography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957659596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0019542

DO - 10.1037/a0019542

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 165

EP - 176

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 2

ER -