Impact of differential predation potential on eelgrass (Zostera marina) faunal community structure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The trophic structure of fauna within eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) was assessed at two sites in Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, USA during the summer of 1999. Although the sites were similar with respect to both Z. marina shoot density and plant biomass, they differed significantly in the relative distribution of large predatory fish (e.g., Cynoscion regalis, Paralichthys dentatus, Morone saxatilis). Site One, Marsh Elder, was characterized by a significantly greater catch per unit effort for large predators than Site Two, Shelter Island. Gut content analysis provided direct evidence of trophic linking and significant declines between these fish and four of the five most abundant organisms collected in throw traps used to analyze the density of large benthic prey/small predators. The densities of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp. Hippolyte zostericola), blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), and small predatory fish (e.g., Syngnathus fuscus, Opsanus spp., Tautoga onitus) were significantly reduced at Marsh Elder, potentially as a direct impact of large predatory fish. In turn, the differences in the density of small predators observed between sites produced either a significant positive or negative effect on the distribution of small benthic prey (e.g., polychaetes, amphipods), resulting in a two-step trophic cascade within the system. Additionally, an analysis of similarities defined each site independently for both large prey/small predators and small benthic prey community structure. Although the mechanism which produced the differences in the distribution of large predatory fish remains unknown, their impact on faunal community structure mediated not only the distribution of their potential prey, but also subsequent lower trophic levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-229
Number of pages9
JournalAquatic Ecology
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Zostera marina
marina
Cyclachaena xanthiifolia
community structure
predation
Palaemonetes
predators
predator
fish
Opsanus
Paralichthys dentatus
fish roe
marsh
Callinectes sapidus
Morone saxatilis
trophic cascade
trophic structure
Amphipoda
Polychaeta
catch per unit effort

Keywords

  • Community structure
  • Top-down
  • Trophic cascade
  • Zostera marina

Cite this

@article{201be1096f904ddaa64bd1cc7a307775,
title = "Impact of differential predation potential on eelgrass (Zostera marina) faunal community structure",
abstract = "The trophic structure of fauna within eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) was assessed at two sites in Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, USA during the summer of 1999. Although the sites were similar with respect to both Z. marina shoot density and plant biomass, they differed significantly in the relative distribution of large predatory fish (e.g., Cynoscion regalis, Paralichthys dentatus, Morone saxatilis). Site One, Marsh Elder, was characterized by a significantly greater catch per unit effort for large predators than Site Two, Shelter Island. Gut content analysis provided direct evidence of trophic linking and significant declines between these fish and four of the five most abundant organisms collected in throw traps used to analyze the density of large benthic prey/small predators. The densities of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp. Hippolyte zostericola), blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), and small predatory fish (e.g., Syngnathus fuscus, Opsanus spp., Tautoga onitus) were significantly reduced at Marsh Elder, potentially as a direct impact of large predatory fish. In turn, the differences in the density of small predators observed between sites produced either a significant positive or negative effect on the distribution of small benthic prey (e.g., polychaetes, amphipods), resulting in a two-step trophic cascade within the system. Additionally, an analysis of similarities defined each site independently for both large prey/small predators and small benthic prey community structure. Although the mechanism which produced the differences in the distribution of large predatory fish remains unknown, their impact on faunal community structure mediated not only the distribution of their potential prey, but also subsequent lower trophic levels.",
keywords = "Community structure, Top-down, Trophic cascade, Zostera marina",
author = "Paul Bologna",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10452-006-9059-x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "221--229",
journal = "Aquatic Ecology",
issn = "1386-2588",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Impact of differential predation potential on eelgrass (Zostera marina) faunal community structure. / Bologna, Paul.

In: Aquatic Ecology, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 221-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of differential predation potential on eelgrass (Zostera marina) faunal community structure

AU - Bologna, Paul

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - The trophic structure of fauna within eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) was assessed at two sites in Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, USA during the summer of 1999. Although the sites were similar with respect to both Z. marina shoot density and plant biomass, they differed significantly in the relative distribution of large predatory fish (e.g., Cynoscion regalis, Paralichthys dentatus, Morone saxatilis). Site One, Marsh Elder, was characterized by a significantly greater catch per unit effort for large predators than Site Two, Shelter Island. Gut content analysis provided direct evidence of trophic linking and significant declines between these fish and four of the five most abundant organisms collected in throw traps used to analyze the density of large benthic prey/small predators. The densities of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp. Hippolyte zostericola), blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), and small predatory fish (e.g., Syngnathus fuscus, Opsanus spp., Tautoga onitus) were significantly reduced at Marsh Elder, potentially as a direct impact of large predatory fish. In turn, the differences in the density of small predators observed between sites produced either a significant positive or negative effect on the distribution of small benthic prey (e.g., polychaetes, amphipods), resulting in a two-step trophic cascade within the system. Additionally, an analysis of similarities defined each site independently for both large prey/small predators and small benthic prey community structure. Although the mechanism which produced the differences in the distribution of large predatory fish remains unknown, their impact on faunal community structure mediated not only the distribution of their potential prey, but also subsequent lower trophic levels.

AB - The trophic structure of fauna within eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) was assessed at two sites in Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, USA during the summer of 1999. Although the sites were similar with respect to both Z. marina shoot density and plant biomass, they differed significantly in the relative distribution of large predatory fish (e.g., Cynoscion regalis, Paralichthys dentatus, Morone saxatilis). Site One, Marsh Elder, was characterized by a significantly greater catch per unit effort for large predators than Site Two, Shelter Island. Gut content analysis provided direct evidence of trophic linking and significant declines between these fish and four of the five most abundant organisms collected in throw traps used to analyze the density of large benthic prey/small predators. The densities of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp. Hippolyte zostericola), blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), and small predatory fish (e.g., Syngnathus fuscus, Opsanus spp., Tautoga onitus) were significantly reduced at Marsh Elder, potentially as a direct impact of large predatory fish. In turn, the differences in the density of small predators observed between sites produced either a significant positive or negative effect on the distribution of small benthic prey (e.g., polychaetes, amphipods), resulting in a two-step trophic cascade within the system. Additionally, an analysis of similarities defined each site independently for both large prey/small predators and small benthic prey community structure. Although the mechanism which produced the differences in the distribution of large predatory fish remains unknown, their impact on faunal community structure mediated not only the distribution of their potential prey, but also subsequent lower trophic levels.

KW - Community structure

KW - Top-down

KW - Trophic cascade

KW - Zostera marina

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447619150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10452-006-9059-x

DO - 10.1007/s10452-006-9059-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34447619150

VL - 41

SP - 221

EP - 229

JO - Aquatic Ecology

JF - Aquatic Ecology

SN - 1386-2588

IS - 2

ER -