Independent directors and dividend payouts in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era

Timothy G. Coville, Gary Kleinman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The manner in which publicly traded companies' management teams handle their firm's free cash flows (FCF) has been an issue for many decades, because it is difficult to determine whether these management teams work for their own benefit or for that of their shareholders. Recent financial scandals have heightened mistrust of management. This mistrust, in turn, may have increased the pressure to reduce the portion of FCF left under management's control. Boards of directors control dividend payout decisions, thus determining the portion of FCF available to corporate management. This paper examines whether the 2002 legal response to corporate financial reporting scandals, which came in the form of many new initiatives and requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) on all publicly traded firms, was relevant to dividend payouts. This question is investigated by noting that the impact of these new requirements differed among firms. Some firms had already introduced the use of independent directors and fully independent committees prior to SOX making them compulsory in 2002. This paper examines whether these "pre-Adopters" experienced less change in their dividend payout policies than those firms that were forced to change the composition of their board and committees. This investigation examines the effect on dividend payouts for listed firms attributable to the SOX and concurrent changes in stock exchange regulations that compelled increased use of independent directors and fully independent committees. To study the impact of SOX and the associated, required, changes in the composition of boards of directors for many firms, the difference-in-differences methodology is employed to overcome the endogeneity concerns that have consistently challenged prior governance studies. This was accomplished by examining the effects on dividend payouts associated with the exogenously forced addition of independent directors to the boards of publicly listed firms. The results reveal that there is a significant positive relationship between firms that were compelled by law to change their boards and increases in average changes in dividend payouts and percentage changes in dividends paid, when compared to firms that had pre-Adopted the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate board composition requirements. A further exploratory analysis showed that the same significant positive relationship is detected for increases in average changes in total dollars distributed, where stock repurchase dollars are combined with dividend payouts. These findings imply that these board composition changes led to decisions that increased dividend payouts in percentage terms, as well as dividend payouts and total dollars distributed in aggregate dollar amount terms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-98
Number of pages42
JournalAdvances in Public Interest Accounting
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

director
firm
dollar
act
board of directors
management
scandal
dividend payout policy
Dividends
Sarbanes-Oxley
Independent directors
stock exchange
shareholder
governance
regulation
Law
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
methodology
Free cash flow

Keywords

  • Dividends
  • Governance
  • Independent director
  • Natural experiment
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

Cite this

@article{cb3d10e77149444b83e9bb23e4804e68,
title = "Independent directors and dividend payouts in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era",
abstract = "The manner in which publicly traded companies' management teams handle their firm's free cash flows (FCF) has been an issue for many decades, because it is difficult to determine whether these management teams work for their own benefit or for that of their shareholders. Recent financial scandals have heightened mistrust of management. This mistrust, in turn, may have increased the pressure to reduce the portion of FCF left under management's control. Boards of directors control dividend payout decisions, thus determining the portion of FCF available to corporate management. This paper examines whether the 2002 legal response to corporate financial reporting scandals, which came in the form of many new initiatives and requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) on all publicly traded firms, was relevant to dividend payouts. This question is investigated by noting that the impact of these new requirements differed among firms. Some firms had already introduced the use of independent directors and fully independent committees prior to SOX making them compulsory in 2002. This paper examines whether these {"}pre-Adopters{"} experienced less change in their dividend payout policies than those firms that were forced to change the composition of their board and committees. This investigation examines the effect on dividend payouts for listed firms attributable to the SOX and concurrent changes in stock exchange regulations that compelled increased use of independent directors and fully independent committees. To study the impact of SOX and the associated, required, changes in the composition of boards of directors for many firms, the difference-in-differences methodology is employed to overcome the endogeneity concerns that have consistently challenged prior governance studies. This was accomplished by examining the effects on dividend payouts associated with the exogenously forced addition of independent directors to the boards of publicly listed firms. The results reveal that there is a significant positive relationship between firms that were compelled by law to change their boards and increases in average changes in dividend payouts and percentage changes in dividends paid, when compared to firms that had pre-Adopted the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate board composition requirements. A further exploratory analysis showed that the same significant positive relationship is detected for increases in average changes in total dollars distributed, where stock repurchase dollars are combined with dividend payouts. These findings imply that these board composition changes led to decisions that increased dividend payouts in percentage terms, as well as dividend payouts and total dollars distributed in aggregate dollar amount terms.",
keywords = "Dividends, Governance, Independent director, Natural experiment, Sarbanes-Oxley",
author = "Coville, {Timothy G.} and Gary Kleinman",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1041-706020150000018002",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "57--98",
journal = "Advances in Public Interest Accounting",
issn = "1041-7060",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

Independent directors and dividend payouts in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era. / Coville, Timothy G.; Kleinman, Gary.

In: Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 18, 01.01.2015, p. 57-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Independent directors and dividend payouts in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era

AU - Coville, Timothy G.

AU - Kleinman, Gary

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The manner in which publicly traded companies' management teams handle their firm's free cash flows (FCF) has been an issue for many decades, because it is difficult to determine whether these management teams work for their own benefit or for that of their shareholders. Recent financial scandals have heightened mistrust of management. This mistrust, in turn, may have increased the pressure to reduce the portion of FCF left under management's control. Boards of directors control dividend payout decisions, thus determining the portion of FCF available to corporate management. This paper examines whether the 2002 legal response to corporate financial reporting scandals, which came in the form of many new initiatives and requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) on all publicly traded firms, was relevant to dividend payouts. This question is investigated by noting that the impact of these new requirements differed among firms. Some firms had already introduced the use of independent directors and fully independent committees prior to SOX making them compulsory in 2002. This paper examines whether these "pre-Adopters" experienced less change in their dividend payout policies than those firms that were forced to change the composition of their board and committees. This investigation examines the effect on dividend payouts for listed firms attributable to the SOX and concurrent changes in stock exchange regulations that compelled increased use of independent directors and fully independent committees. To study the impact of SOX and the associated, required, changes in the composition of boards of directors for many firms, the difference-in-differences methodology is employed to overcome the endogeneity concerns that have consistently challenged prior governance studies. This was accomplished by examining the effects on dividend payouts associated with the exogenously forced addition of independent directors to the boards of publicly listed firms. The results reveal that there is a significant positive relationship between firms that were compelled by law to change their boards and increases in average changes in dividend payouts and percentage changes in dividends paid, when compared to firms that had pre-Adopted the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate board composition requirements. A further exploratory analysis showed that the same significant positive relationship is detected for increases in average changes in total dollars distributed, where stock repurchase dollars are combined with dividend payouts. These findings imply that these board composition changes led to decisions that increased dividend payouts in percentage terms, as well as dividend payouts and total dollars distributed in aggregate dollar amount terms.

AB - The manner in which publicly traded companies' management teams handle their firm's free cash flows (FCF) has been an issue for many decades, because it is difficult to determine whether these management teams work for their own benefit or for that of their shareholders. Recent financial scandals have heightened mistrust of management. This mistrust, in turn, may have increased the pressure to reduce the portion of FCF left under management's control. Boards of directors control dividend payout decisions, thus determining the portion of FCF available to corporate management. This paper examines whether the 2002 legal response to corporate financial reporting scandals, which came in the form of many new initiatives and requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) on all publicly traded firms, was relevant to dividend payouts. This question is investigated by noting that the impact of these new requirements differed among firms. Some firms had already introduced the use of independent directors and fully independent committees prior to SOX making them compulsory in 2002. This paper examines whether these "pre-Adopters" experienced less change in their dividend payout policies than those firms that were forced to change the composition of their board and committees. This investigation examines the effect on dividend payouts for listed firms attributable to the SOX and concurrent changes in stock exchange regulations that compelled increased use of independent directors and fully independent committees. To study the impact of SOX and the associated, required, changes in the composition of boards of directors for many firms, the difference-in-differences methodology is employed to overcome the endogeneity concerns that have consistently challenged prior governance studies. This was accomplished by examining the effects on dividend payouts associated with the exogenously forced addition of independent directors to the boards of publicly listed firms. The results reveal that there is a significant positive relationship between firms that were compelled by law to change their boards and increases in average changes in dividend payouts and percentage changes in dividends paid, when compared to firms that had pre-Adopted the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate board composition requirements. A further exploratory analysis showed that the same significant positive relationship is detected for increases in average changes in total dollars distributed, where stock repurchase dollars are combined with dividend payouts. These findings imply that these board composition changes led to decisions that increased dividend payouts in percentage terms, as well as dividend payouts and total dollars distributed in aggregate dollar amount terms.

KW - Dividends

KW - Governance

KW - Independent director

KW - Natural experiment

KW - Sarbanes-Oxley

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941117301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1041-706020150000018002

DO - 10.1108/S1041-706020150000018002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941117301

VL - 18

SP - 57

EP - 98

JO - Advances in Public Interest Accounting

JF - Advances in Public Interest Accounting

SN - 1041-7060

ER -