Abstract
Despite compelling rationale based on the theory of comparative advantage for free trade, many countries adopt restrictive trade practices. In this paper we investigate this puzzle in a stylized two-country two-good Ricardian model of international trade. Governments can offer protection to domestic industries via industrial subsidy policy in this model. We prove the existence of a Nash equilibrium in the two-player game where industries choose the level of specialization. We determine the necessary conditions for complete specialization in (a) the free-trade regime; and (b) the protectionist regime implemented through industrial subsidy policy. Our results show that if the government intends to promote complete specialization, then a high degree of comparative advantage and a large elasticity of substitution between export and import goods are required. Empirical evidence on these two parameters indicate that complete specialization is unlikely to survive in the protectionist regime.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-88 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Economic Modelling |
| Volume | 91 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2020 |
Keywords
- Comparative advantage
- Complete specialization
- Free trade
- Industrial subsidy
- Protectionism