Intentional inferences are not more likely than unintentional ones: Some evidence against the intentionality bias hypothesis

Jamie S. Hughes, Joshua Sandry, David Trafimow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume152
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Research

Keywords

  • attribution
  • intentional bias
  • intentionality
  • social perception

Cite this

@article{f6ac97c8a4bc433694a33af894577f64,
title = "Intentional inferences are not more likely than unintentional ones: Some evidence against the intentionality bias hypothesis",
abstract = "We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.",
keywords = "attribution, intentional bias, intentionality, social perception",
author = "Hughes, {Jamie S.} and Joshua Sandry and David Trafimow",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.2011.565383",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "1--4",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Intentional inferences are not more likely than unintentional ones : Some evidence against the intentionality bias hypothesis. / Hughes, Jamie S.; Sandry, Joshua; Trafimow, David.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 152, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 1-4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentional inferences are not more likely than unintentional ones

T2 - Some evidence against the intentionality bias hypothesis

AU - Hughes, Jamie S.

AU - Sandry, Joshua

AU - Trafimow, David

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.

AB - We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.

KW - attribution

KW - intentional bias

KW - intentionality

KW - social perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856364726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.2011.565383

DO - 10.1080/00224545.2011.565383

M3 - Article

C2 - 22308757

AN - SCOPUS:84856364726

VL - 152

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 1

ER -