Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems

Michael D. Steven, Timothy J. Malthus, Frédéric Baret, Hui Xu, Mark Chopping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

259 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spectroradiometric measurements were made over a range of crop canopy densities, soil backgrounds and foliage colour. The reflected spectral radiances were convoluted with the spectral response functions of a range of satellite instruments to simulate their responses. When Normalised Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVI) from the different instruments were compared, they varied by a few percent, but the values were strongly linearly related, allowing vegetation indices from one instrument to be intercalibrated against another. A table of conversion coefficents is presented for AVHRR, ATSR-2, Landsat MSS, TM and ETM+, SPOT-2 and SPOT-4 HRV, IRS, IKONOS, SEAWIFS, MISR, MODIS, POLDER, Quickbird and MERIS (see Appendix A for glossary of acronyms). The same set of coefficients was found to apply, within the margin of error of the analysis, for the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SAVI. The relationships for SPOT vs. TM and for ATSR-2 vs. AVHRR were directly validated by comparison of atmospherically corrected image data. The results indicate that vegetation indices can be interconverted to a precision of 1-2%. This result offers improved opportunities for monitoring crops through the growing season and the prospects of better continuity of long-term monitoring of vegetation responses to environmental change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-422
Number of pages11
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Dec 2003

Fingerprint

SPOT
vegetation index
Along Track Scanning Radiometer
sensor
AVHRR
Sensors
POLDER
MISR
MERIS
crop
IKONOS
Advanced very high resolution radiometers (AVHRR)
soil density
QuickBird
Landsat multispectral scanner
monitoring
moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
soil analysis
Landsat
NDVI

Keywords

  • Sensor systems
  • Spectroradiometric measurements
  • Vegetation index

Cite this

Steven, Michael D. ; Malthus, Timothy J. ; Baret, Frédéric ; Xu, Hui ; Chopping, Mark. / Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. In: Remote Sensing of Environment. 2003 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 412-422.
@article{8f2ac0703ad649dbaacd07655a4d18a4,
title = "Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems",
abstract = "Spectroradiometric measurements were made over a range of crop canopy densities, soil backgrounds and foliage colour. The reflected spectral radiances were convoluted with the spectral response functions of a range of satellite instruments to simulate their responses. When Normalised Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVI) from the different instruments were compared, they varied by a few percent, but the values were strongly linearly related, allowing vegetation indices from one instrument to be intercalibrated against another. A table of conversion coefficents is presented for AVHRR, ATSR-2, Landsat MSS, TM and ETM+, SPOT-2 and SPOT-4 HRV, IRS, IKONOS, SEAWIFS, MISR, MODIS, POLDER, Quickbird and MERIS (see Appendix A for glossary of acronyms). The same set of coefficients was found to apply, within the margin of error of the analysis, for the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SAVI. The relationships for SPOT vs. TM and for ATSR-2 vs. AVHRR were directly validated by comparison of atmospherically corrected image data. The results indicate that vegetation indices can be interconverted to a precision of 1-2{\%}. This result offers improved opportunities for monitoring crops through the growing season and the prospects of better continuity of long-term monitoring of vegetation responses to environmental change.",
keywords = "Sensor systems, Spectroradiometric measurements, Vegetation index",
author = "Steven, {Michael D.} and Malthus, {Timothy J.} and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Baret and Hui Xu and Mark Chopping",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "412--422",
journal = "Remote Sensing of Environment",
issn = "0034-4257",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. / Steven, Michael D.; Malthus, Timothy J.; Baret, Frédéric; Xu, Hui; Chopping, Mark.

In: Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 88, No. 4, 30.12.2003, p. 412-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems

AU - Steven, Michael D.

AU - Malthus, Timothy J.

AU - Baret, Frédéric

AU - Xu, Hui

AU - Chopping, Mark

PY - 2003/12/30

Y1 - 2003/12/30

N2 - Spectroradiometric measurements were made over a range of crop canopy densities, soil backgrounds and foliage colour. The reflected spectral radiances were convoluted with the spectral response functions of a range of satellite instruments to simulate their responses. When Normalised Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVI) from the different instruments were compared, they varied by a few percent, but the values were strongly linearly related, allowing vegetation indices from one instrument to be intercalibrated against another. A table of conversion coefficents is presented for AVHRR, ATSR-2, Landsat MSS, TM and ETM+, SPOT-2 and SPOT-4 HRV, IRS, IKONOS, SEAWIFS, MISR, MODIS, POLDER, Quickbird and MERIS (see Appendix A for glossary of acronyms). The same set of coefficients was found to apply, within the margin of error of the analysis, for the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SAVI. The relationships for SPOT vs. TM and for ATSR-2 vs. AVHRR were directly validated by comparison of atmospherically corrected image data. The results indicate that vegetation indices can be interconverted to a precision of 1-2%. This result offers improved opportunities for monitoring crops through the growing season and the prospects of better continuity of long-term monitoring of vegetation responses to environmental change.

AB - Spectroradiometric measurements were made over a range of crop canopy densities, soil backgrounds and foliage colour. The reflected spectral radiances were convoluted with the spectral response functions of a range of satellite instruments to simulate their responses. When Normalised Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVI) from the different instruments were compared, they varied by a few percent, but the values were strongly linearly related, allowing vegetation indices from one instrument to be intercalibrated against another. A table of conversion coefficents is presented for AVHRR, ATSR-2, Landsat MSS, TM and ETM+, SPOT-2 and SPOT-4 HRV, IRS, IKONOS, SEAWIFS, MISR, MODIS, POLDER, Quickbird and MERIS (see Appendix A for glossary of acronyms). The same set of coefficients was found to apply, within the margin of error of the analysis, for the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SAVI. The relationships for SPOT vs. TM and for ATSR-2 vs. AVHRR were directly validated by comparison of atmospherically corrected image data. The results indicate that vegetation indices can be interconverted to a precision of 1-2%. This result offers improved opportunities for monitoring crops through the growing season and the prospects of better continuity of long-term monitoring of vegetation responses to environmental change.

KW - Sensor systems

KW - Spectroradiometric measurements

KW - Vegetation index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842306351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0842306351

VL - 88

SP - 412

EP - 422

JO - Remote Sensing of Environment

JF - Remote Sensing of Environment

SN - 0034-4257

IS - 4

ER -