Inverse function: Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings

Teo Paoletti, Irma E. Stevens, Natalie L.F. Hobson, Kevin C. Moore, Kevin R. LaForest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers have argued teachers and students are not developing connected meanings for function inverse, thus calling for a closer examination of teachers’ and students’ inverse function meanings. Responding to this call, we characterize 25 pre-service teachers’ inverse function meanings as inferred from our analysis of clinical interviews. After summarizing relevant research, we describe the methodology and theoretical framework we used to interpret the pre-service teachers’ activities. We then present data highlighting the techniques the pre-service teachers used when responding to tasks that involved analytical and graphical representations of functions and inverse functions in both decontextualized and contextualized situations and discuss our inferences of their meanings based on their activities. We conclude with implications for the teaching and learning of inverse function and areas for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-109
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Studies in Mathematics
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Pre-service Teachers
Inverse function
teacher
Graphical Representation
Meaning
student
Methodology
examination
methodology
Teaching
interview
learning

Keywords

  • Function
  • Inverse function
  • Meanings
  • Pre-service secondary teachers

Cite this

Paoletti, Teo ; Stevens, Irma E. ; Hobson, Natalie L.F. ; Moore, Kevin C. ; LaForest, Kevin R. / Inverse function : Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings. In: Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2018 ; Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 93-109.
@article{9be337f834c44a1da9a6d0412f6e6b6b,
title = "Inverse function: Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings",
abstract = "Researchers have argued teachers and students are not developing connected meanings for function inverse, thus calling for a closer examination of teachers’ and students’ inverse function meanings. Responding to this call, we characterize 25 pre-service teachers’ inverse function meanings as inferred from our analysis of clinical interviews. After summarizing relevant research, we describe the methodology and theoretical framework we used to interpret the pre-service teachers’ activities. We then present data highlighting the techniques the pre-service teachers used when responding to tasks that involved analytical and graphical representations of functions and inverse functions in both decontextualized and contextualized situations and discuss our inferences of their meanings based on their activities. We conclude with implications for the teaching and learning of inverse function and areas for future research.",
keywords = "Function, Inverse function, Meanings, Pre-service secondary teachers",
author = "Teo Paoletti and Stevens, {Irma E.} and Hobson, {Natalie L.F.} and Moore, {Kevin C.} and LaForest, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10649-017-9787-y",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "93--109",
journal = "Educational Studies in Mathematics",
issn = "0013-1954",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Inverse function : Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings. / Paoletti, Teo; Stevens, Irma E.; Hobson, Natalie L.F.; Moore, Kevin C.; LaForest, Kevin R.

In: Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 97, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 93-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inverse function

T2 - Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings

AU - Paoletti, Teo

AU - Stevens, Irma E.

AU - Hobson, Natalie L.F.

AU - Moore, Kevin C.

AU - LaForest, Kevin R.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Researchers have argued teachers and students are not developing connected meanings for function inverse, thus calling for a closer examination of teachers’ and students’ inverse function meanings. Responding to this call, we characterize 25 pre-service teachers’ inverse function meanings as inferred from our analysis of clinical interviews. After summarizing relevant research, we describe the methodology and theoretical framework we used to interpret the pre-service teachers’ activities. We then present data highlighting the techniques the pre-service teachers used when responding to tasks that involved analytical and graphical representations of functions and inverse functions in both decontextualized and contextualized situations and discuss our inferences of their meanings based on their activities. We conclude with implications for the teaching and learning of inverse function and areas for future research.

AB - Researchers have argued teachers and students are not developing connected meanings for function inverse, thus calling for a closer examination of teachers’ and students’ inverse function meanings. Responding to this call, we characterize 25 pre-service teachers’ inverse function meanings as inferred from our analysis of clinical interviews. After summarizing relevant research, we describe the methodology and theoretical framework we used to interpret the pre-service teachers’ activities. We then present data highlighting the techniques the pre-service teachers used when responding to tasks that involved analytical and graphical representations of functions and inverse functions in both decontextualized and contextualized situations and discuss our inferences of their meanings based on their activities. We conclude with implications for the teaching and learning of inverse function and areas for future research.

KW - Function

KW - Inverse function

KW - Meanings

KW - Pre-service secondary teachers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030330610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10649-017-9787-y

DO - 10.1007/s10649-017-9787-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030330610

VL - 97

SP - 93

EP - 109

JO - Educational Studies in Mathematics

JF - Educational Studies in Mathematics

SN - 0013-1954

IS - 1

ER -