Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?

Robert M. Krauss, Jennifer Pardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-204
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume27
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Psychology
communication
alignment

Cite this

@article{0b2df67ec3f44a59a26eb886e61cb252,
title = "Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?",
abstract = "Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.",
author = "Krauss, {Robert M.} and Jennifer Pardo",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "203--204",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Is alignment always the result of automatic priming? / Krauss, Robert M.; Pardo, Jennifer.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.04.2004, p. 203-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?

AU - Krauss, Robert M.

AU - Pardo, Jennifer

PY - 2004/4/1

Y1 - 2004/4/1

N2 - Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.

AB - Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444453766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 203

EP - 204

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -