Is There Social Consensus Regarding Researcher Conflicts of Interest?

Zeynep G. Aytug, Hannah R. Rothstein, Mary C. Kern, Zhu Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Consensus around what constitutes researcher conflicts of interest (COIs) and awareness of their influence on our research are two critical steps in ensuring the integrity of our science. In this research, data were collected from individual scholars via 2 surveys 5 years apart and from journals and associations to examine the level of social consensus and moral awareness among scholars, journals, and associations regarding researcher COIs. Although we observed increases in level of social consensus and moral awareness between 2012 and 2017, results still revealed limited agreement about what relationships constitute a COI and limited awareness about the presence of and the ethical issues surrounding COIs. Although all journals and associations we examined supported COI disclosure, most did not provide researchers with detailed COI-related information, guidance, or disclosure tools. Limited social consensus and moral awareness regarding COIs is problematic because it inhibits the recognition, disclosure, and management of COIs and limits ethical decision making. We need to continue and enhance discussions about COIs and aim to create consensus and awareness where we do not have it with the goal of reducing potential scientific misconduct related to COIs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-140
Number of pages40
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
Consensus
Research Personnel
Disclosure
Scientific Misconduct
Research
Ethics
Decision Making

Keywords

  • conflict of interest
  • ethical decision making
  • moral awareness
  • research ethics
  • social consensus

Cite this

Aytug, Zeynep G. ; Rothstein, Hannah R. ; Kern, Mary C. ; Zhu, Zhu. / Is There Social Consensus Regarding Researcher Conflicts of Interest?. In: Ethics and Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 101-140.
@article{8512cf75552e42b5a8705fd23d9f4ea3,
title = "Is There Social Consensus Regarding Researcher Conflicts of Interest?",
abstract = "Consensus around what constitutes researcher conflicts of interest (COIs) and awareness of their influence on our research are two critical steps in ensuring the integrity of our science. In this research, data were collected from individual scholars via 2 surveys 5 years apart and from journals and associations to examine the level of social consensus and moral awareness among scholars, journals, and associations regarding researcher COIs. Although we observed increases in level of social consensus and moral awareness between 2012 and 2017, results still revealed limited agreement about what relationships constitute a COI and limited awareness about the presence of and the ethical issues surrounding COIs. Although all journals and associations we examined supported COI disclosure, most did not provide researchers with detailed COI-related information, guidance, or disclosure tools. Limited social consensus and moral awareness regarding COIs is problematic because it inhibits the recognition, disclosure, and management of COIs and limits ethical decision making. We need to continue and enhance discussions about COIs and aim to create consensus and awareness where we do not have it with the goal of reducing potential scientific misconduct related to COIs.",
keywords = "conflict of interest, ethical decision making, moral awareness, research ethics, social consensus",
author = "Aytug, {Zeynep G.} and Rothstein, {Hannah R.} and Kern, {Mary C.} and Zhu Zhu",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/10508422.2017.1402683",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "101--140",
journal = "Ethics and Behavior",
issn = "1050-8422",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Is There Social Consensus Regarding Researcher Conflicts of Interest? / Aytug, Zeynep G.; Rothstein, Hannah R.; Kern, Mary C.; Zhu, Zhu.

In: Ethics and Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 2, 17.02.2019, p. 101-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is There Social Consensus Regarding Researcher Conflicts of Interest?

AU - Aytug, Zeynep G.

AU - Rothstein, Hannah R.

AU - Kern, Mary C.

AU - Zhu, Zhu

PY - 2019/2/17

Y1 - 2019/2/17

N2 - Consensus around what constitutes researcher conflicts of interest (COIs) and awareness of their influence on our research are two critical steps in ensuring the integrity of our science. In this research, data were collected from individual scholars via 2 surveys 5 years apart and from journals and associations to examine the level of social consensus and moral awareness among scholars, journals, and associations regarding researcher COIs. Although we observed increases in level of social consensus and moral awareness between 2012 and 2017, results still revealed limited agreement about what relationships constitute a COI and limited awareness about the presence of and the ethical issues surrounding COIs. Although all journals and associations we examined supported COI disclosure, most did not provide researchers with detailed COI-related information, guidance, or disclosure tools. Limited social consensus and moral awareness regarding COIs is problematic because it inhibits the recognition, disclosure, and management of COIs and limits ethical decision making. We need to continue and enhance discussions about COIs and aim to create consensus and awareness where we do not have it with the goal of reducing potential scientific misconduct related to COIs.

AB - Consensus around what constitutes researcher conflicts of interest (COIs) and awareness of their influence on our research are two critical steps in ensuring the integrity of our science. In this research, data were collected from individual scholars via 2 surveys 5 years apart and from journals and associations to examine the level of social consensus and moral awareness among scholars, journals, and associations regarding researcher COIs. Although we observed increases in level of social consensus and moral awareness between 2012 and 2017, results still revealed limited agreement about what relationships constitute a COI and limited awareness about the presence of and the ethical issues surrounding COIs. Although all journals and associations we examined supported COI disclosure, most did not provide researchers with detailed COI-related information, guidance, or disclosure tools. Limited social consensus and moral awareness regarding COIs is problematic because it inhibits the recognition, disclosure, and management of COIs and limits ethical decision making. We need to continue and enhance discussions about COIs and aim to create consensus and awareness where we do not have it with the goal of reducing potential scientific misconduct related to COIs.

KW - conflict of interest

KW - ethical decision making

KW - moral awareness

KW - research ethics

KW - social consensus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035152183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2017.1402683

DO - 10.1080/10508422.2017.1402683

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035152183

VL - 29

SP - 101

EP - 140

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

SN - 1050-8422

IS - 2

ER -