Is urban greening for everyone? Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Focusing on the subthemes of how governance happens and processes of marginalization, this paper examines a case study in Gowanus, Brooklyn to explore inclusion and exclusion in urban environmental decision-making processes. This work gains support from theoretical considerations in urban political ecology and interdisciplinary research on green gentrification and how power differences and inequity impact civic involvement. The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York became a Superfund site in 2010, after much debate between local, state, and federal government offices over how to pursue clean up. Private development, local and state initiatives are addressing the sewage and other contamination along the banks of the canal while the Superfund clean up in the waterway takes place. The area has become a site for enacting waterfront planning and economic development, green infrastructure creation, brownfield redevelopment, and other local and state green planning initiatives. Public forums on cleaning and greening Gowanus have engaged the community, and allowed space for discussing the possibilities for the future of the area. This paper will focus on interview responses in relation to the federal Environmental Protection Agency decision-making process. Why do some residents support or oppose the clean up processes in Gowanus, and what influences their ability or desire to take part in the decision-making processes? Further, for whom is this space being redeveloped, and how do inclusion and exclusion operate to create divisions in decision-making processes surrounding the clean up?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-294
Number of pages10
JournalUrban Forestry and Urban Greening
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

social inclusion
social exclusion
canals (waterways)
canal
decision making
Superfund
green infrastructure
planning
brownfields
interdisciplinary research
federal government
state government
gentrification
United States Environmental Protection Agency
waterways
marginalization
local government
redevelopment
governance
economic development

Keywords

  • Civic engagement inequity
  • Environmental gentrification
  • Environmental perception
  • Superfund
  • Urban greening
  • Urban political ecology

Cite this

@article{1b8483bfe6e54eb28ccab977de0bf82e,
title = "Is urban greening for everyone? Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal",
abstract = "Focusing on the subthemes of how governance happens and processes of marginalization, this paper examines a case study in Gowanus, Brooklyn to explore inclusion and exclusion in urban environmental decision-making processes. This work gains support from theoretical considerations in urban political ecology and interdisciplinary research on green gentrification and how power differences and inequity impact civic involvement. The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York became a Superfund site in 2010, after much debate between local, state, and federal government offices over how to pursue clean up. Private development, local and state initiatives are addressing the sewage and other contamination along the banks of the canal while the Superfund clean up in the waterway takes place. The area has become a site for enacting waterfront planning and economic development, green infrastructure creation, brownfield redevelopment, and other local and state green planning initiatives. Public forums on cleaning and greening Gowanus have engaged the community, and allowed space for discussing the possibilities for the future of the area. This paper will focus on interview responses in relation to the federal Environmental Protection Agency decision-making process. Why do some residents support or oppose the clean up processes in Gowanus, and what influences their ability or desire to take part in the decision-making processes? Further, for whom is this space being redeveloped, and how do inclusion and exclusion operate to create divisions in decision-making processes surrounding the clean up?",
keywords = "Civic engagement inequity, Environmental gentrification, Environmental perception, Superfund, Urban greening, Urban political ecology",
author = "Jessica Miller",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.004",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "285--294",
journal = "Urban Forestry and Urban Greening",
issn = "1618-8667",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag GmbH und Co. KG",

}

Is urban greening for everyone? Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal. / Miller, Jessica.

In: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Vol. 19, 01.09.2016, p. 285-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is urban greening for everyone? Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal

AU - Miller, Jessica

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Focusing on the subthemes of how governance happens and processes of marginalization, this paper examines a case study in Gowanus, Brooklyn to explore inclusion and exclusion in urban environmental decision-making processes. This work gains support from theoretical considerations in urban political ecology and interdisciplinary research on green gentrification and how power differences and inequity impact civic involvement. The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York became a Superfund site in 2010, after much debate between local, state, and federal government offices over how to pursue clean up. Private development, local and state initiatives are addressing the sewage and other contamination along the banks of the canal while the Superfund clean up in the waterway takes place. The area has become a site for enacting waterfront planning and economic development, green infrastructure creation, brownfield redevelopment, and other local and state green planning initiatives. Public forums on cleaning and greening Gowanus have engaged the community, and allowed space for discussing the possibilities for the future of the area. This paper will focus on interview responses in relation to the federal Environmental Protection Agency decision-making process. Why do some residents support or oppose the clean up processes in Gowanus, and what influences their ability or desire to take part in the decision-making processes? Further, for whom is this space being redeveloped, and how do inclusion and exclusion operate to create divisions in decision-making processes surrounding the clean up?

AB - Focusing on the subthemes of how governance happens and processes of marginalization, this paper examines a case study in Gowanus, Brooklyn to explore inclusion and exclusion in urban environmental decision-making processes. This work gains support from theoretical considerations in urban political ecology and interdisciplinary research on green gentrification and how power differences and inequity impact civic involvement. The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York became a Superfund site in 2010, after much debate between local, state, and federal government offices over how to pursue clean up. Private development, local and state initiatives are addressing the sewage and other contamination along the banks of the canal while the Superfund clean up in the waterway takes place. The area has become a site for enacting waterfront planning and economic development, green infrastructure creation, brownfield redevelopment, and other local and state green planning initiatives. Public forums on cleaning and greening Gowanus have engaged the community, and allowed space for discussing the possibilities for the future of the area. This paper will focus on interview responses in relation to the federal Environmental Protection Agency decision-making process. Why do some residents support or oppose the clean up processes in Gowanus, and what influences their ability or desire to take part in the decision-making processes? Further, for whom is this space being redeveloped, and how do inclusion and exclusion operate to create divisions in decision-making processes surrounding the clean up?

KW - Civic engagement inequity

KW - Environmental gentrification

KW - Environmental perception

KW - Superfund

KW - Urban greening

KW - Urban political ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962385381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962385381

VL - 19

SP - 285

EP - 294

JO - Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

JF - Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

SN - 1618-8667

ER -