Issue networks, value structures and the formulation of accounting standards: An exercise in theory building

Gary Kleinman, David Hossain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study is an exercise in theory building. It begins from the premise that current theory with respect to the setting of accounting standards is inadequate. We advance current theory by incorporating new ideas from sociology (issues network theory, see Heclo (1978, In: King A (ed) The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 87-124) and social psychology (values structure ideas drawn from Shakun (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA). In doing so, we extend previous theorizing on the accounting standard setting process (e.g., triocracy theory). Issue network theory holds that groups with intellectual, ideological and economic interests have interests in, and may exert efforts to influence, policy adoption. It is a natural outgrowth of, and important extension to, triocracy theory. We draw on Shakun's (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA) Evolutionary Systems Design theory to elucidate a theory of motivation. We argue that complex motivational structures influence the behaviors of the parties to the accounting standard setting process. As part of this effort, we categorize the guiding terminal values, instrumental values and operational goals that guide participant behaviors. We draw on previous literature to document parts of the model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-26
Number of pages22
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Systems analysis
Circuit theory
Decision support systems
Values
group decision
Economics
Theory building
Accounting standards
Value network
Exercise
Theory Building
Industry
social psychology
political system
sociology
Evolutionary systems design
Evolutionary
Accounting standard setting
Group decision support systems
Policy making

Keywords

  • Accounting standards
  • FASB
  • Issue network
  • Value group

Cite this

@article{12b0387364ea490789a84fc9487c3b15,
title = "Issue networks, value structures and the formulation of accounting standards: An exercise in theory building",
abstract = "This study is an exercise in theory building. It begins from the premise that current theory with respect to the setting of accounting standards is inadequate. We advance current theory by incorporating new ideas from sociology (issues network theory, see Heclo (1978, In: King A (ed) The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 87-124) and social psychology (values structure ideas drawn from Shakun (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA). In doing so, we extend previous theorizing on the accounting standard setting process (e.g., triocracy theory). Issue network theory holds that groups with intellectual, ideological and economic interests have interests in, and may exert efforts to influence, policy adoption. It is a natural outgrowth of, and important extension to, triocracy theory. We draw on Shakun's (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA) Evolutionary Systems Design theory to elucidate a theory of motivation. We argue that complex motivational structures influence the behaviors of the parties to the accounting standard setting process. As part of this effort, we categorize the guiding terminal values, instrumental values and operational goals that guide participant behaviors. We draw on previous literature to document parts of the model.",
keywords = "Accounting standards, FASB, Issue network, Value group",
author = "Gary Kleinman and David Hossain",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10726-008-9122-1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "5--26",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Issue networks, value structures and the formulation of accounting standards : An exercise in theory building. / Kleinman, Gary; Hossain, David.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 5-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issue networks, value structures and the formulation of accounting standards

T2 - An exercise in theory building

AU - Kleinman, Gary

AU - Hossain, David

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - This study is an exercise in theory building. It begins from the premise that current theory with respect to the setting of accounting standards is inadequate. We advance current theory by incorporating new ideas from sociology (issues network theory, see Heclo (1978, In: King A (ed) The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 87-124) and social psychology (values structure ideas drawn from Shakun (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA). In doing so, we extend previous theorizing on the accounting standard setting process (e.g., triocracy theory). Issue network theory holds that groups with intellectual, ideological and economic interests have interests in, and may exert efforts to influence, policy adoption. It is a natural outgrowth of, and important extension to, triocracy theory. We draw on Shakun's (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA) Evolutionary Systems Design theory to elucidate a theory of motivation. We argue that complex motivational structures influence the behaviors of the parties to the accounting standard setting process. As part of this effort, we categorize the guiding terminal values, instrumental values and operational goals that guide participant behaviors. We draw on previous literature to document parts of the model.

AB - This study is an exercise in theory building. It begins from the premise that current theory with respect to the setting of accounting standards is inadequate. We advance current theory by incorporating new ideas from sociology (issues network theory, see Heclo (1978, In: King A (ed) The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 87-124) and social psychology (values structure ideas drawn from Shakun (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA). In doing so, we extend previous theorizing on the accounting standard setting process (e.g., triocracy theory). Issue network theory holds that groups with intellectual, ideological and economic interests have interests in, and may exert efforts to influence, policy adoption. It is a natural outgrowth of, and important extension to, triocracy theory. We draw on Shakun's (1988, Evolutionary system design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Inc., Oakland, CA) Evolutionary Systems Design theory to elucidate a theory of motivation. We argue that complex motivational structures influence the behaviors of the parties to the accounting standard setting process. As part of this effort, we categorize the guiding terminal values, instrumental values and operational goals that guide participant behaviors. We draw on previous literature to document parts of the model.

KW - Accounting standards

KW - FASB

KW - Issue network

KW - Value group

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849113085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10726-008-9122-1

DO - 10.1007/s10726-008-9122-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58849113085

VL - 18

SP - 5

EP - 26

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 1

ER -