Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths

Laura Lakusta, Barbara Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When people describe motion events, their path expressions are biased toward inclusion of goal paths (e.g., into the house) and omission of source paths (e.g., out of the house). In this paper, we explored whether this asymmetry has its origins in people's non-linguistic representations of events. In three experiments, 4-year-old children and adults described or remembered manner of motion events that represented animate/intentional and physical events. The results suggest that the linguistic asymmetry between goals and sources is not fully rooted in non-linguistic event representations: linguistic descriptions showed the goal bias for both kinds of events, whereas non-linguistic memory for events showed the goal bias only for events involving animate, goal-directed motion. The findings are discussed in terms of the mapping between non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in language, focusing on the role that linguistic principles play in producing a more absolute goal bias from more gradient non-linguistic representations of paths.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-544
Number of pages28
JournalCognitive Science
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Language
Data storage equipment
Experiments

Keywords

  • Conceptual representations
  • Goal
  • Motion events
  • Prominence hierarchies
  • Semantics
  • Source
  • Space-language interface
  • Syntax

Cite this

@article{76b92769f9ca42a29cad1e0ff4b439ce,
title = "Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths",
abstract = "When people describe motion events, their path expressions are biased toward inclusion of goal paths (e.g., into the house) and omission of source paths (e.g., out of the house). In this paper, we explored whether this asymmetry has its origins in people's non-linguistic representations of events. In three experiments, 4-year-old children and adults described or remembered manner of motion events that represented animate/intentional and physical events. The results suggest that the linguistic asymmetry between goals and sources is not fully rooted in non-linguistic event representations: linguistic descriptions showed the goal bias for both kinds of events, whereas non-linguistic memory for events showed the goal bias only for events involving animate, goal-directed motion. The findings are discussed in terms of the mapping between non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in language, focusing on the role that linguistic principles play in producing a more absolute goal bias from more gradient non-linguistic representations of paths.",
keywords = "Conceptual representations, Goal, Motion events, Prominence hierarchies, Semantics, Source, Space-language interface, Syntax",
author = "Laura Lakusta and Barbara Landau",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "517--544",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Language and Memory for Motion Events : Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths. / Lakusta, Laura; Landau, Barbara.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.04.2012, p. 517-544.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Language and Memory for Motion Events

T2 - Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths

AU - Lakusta, Laura

AU - Landau, Barbara

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - When people describe motion events, their path expressions are biased toward inclusion of goal paths (e.g., into the house) and omission of source paths (e.g., out of the house). In this paper, we explored whether this asymmetry has its origins in people's non-linguistic representations of events. In three experiments, 4-year-old children and adults described or remembered manner of motion events that represented animate/intentional and physical events. The results suggest that the linguistic asymmetry between goals and sources is not fully rooted in non-linguistic event representations: linguistic descriptions showed the goal bias for both kinds of events, whereas non-linguistic memory for events showed the goal bias only for events involving animate, goal-directed motion. The findings are discussed in terms of the mapping between non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in language, focusing on the role that linguistic principles play in producing a more absolute goal bias from more gradient non-linguistic representations of paths.

AB - When people describe motion events, their path expressions are biased toward inclusion of goal paths (e.g., into the house) and omission of source paths (e.g., out of the house). In this paper, we explored whether this asymmetry has its origins in people's non-linguistic representations of events. In three experiments, 4-year-old children and adults described or remembered manner of motion events that represented animate/intentional and physical events. The results suggest that the linguistic asymmetry between goals and sources is not fully rooted in non-linguistic event representations: linguistic descriptions showed the goal bias for both kinds of events, whereas non-linguistic memory for events showed the goal bias only for events involving animate, goal-directed motion. The findings are discussed in terms of the mapping between non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in language, focusing on the role that linguistic principles play in producing a more absolute goal bias from more gradient non-linguistic representations of paths.

KW - Conceptual representations

KW - Goal

KW - Motion events

KW - Prominence hierarchies

KW - Semantics

KW - Source

KW - Space-language interface

KW - Syntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859418471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22257087

AN - SCOPUS:84859418471

VL - 36

SP - 517

EP - 544

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 3

ER -