TY - CHAP
T1 - Learning Linkages and Flows between Individuals, Groups, and the Organization
T2 - Creating Programs to Foster Student Engagement in Learning
AU - Sessa, Valerie I.
AU - Finley, Ashley
AU - Gullu, Beyza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/11/21
Y1 - 2012/11/21
N2 - Continuous, "lifelong" learning is not just needed in individuals. Groups and organizations need to learn continuously as well. Although we know a fair amount about how individuals learn (Meltzoff, Kuhl, Movellan, & Sejnowski, 2009) and there is a growing body of literature about how groups and organizations learn (Scribner & Donaldson, 2001, Senge, 2006, Sessa & London, 2006), little is known about continuous learning prompted by the interface between individuals, groups, and organizations. We begin by identifying parallel learning constructs and processes at the individual, group, and organizational levels, and then we briefly discuss a few theories that have addressed learning flow between these three levels. Finally, we analyze a case of an interorganizational project team encompassing subgroups from a number of different universities who are charged with making change within their institutions and sharing their learning at the project team level. While the original aim of the project was to impact student learning, the project team (and the organization housing the project team) soon learned that in order to do so, they also had to concentrate simultaneously on student (individual), faculty (group), and university (organizational) learning as well.
AB - Continuous, "lifelong" learning is not just needed in individuals. Groups and organizations need to learn continuously as well. Although we know a fair amount about how individuals learn (Meltzoff, Kuhl, Movellan, & Sejnowski, 2009) and there is a growing body of literature about how groups and organizations learn (Scribner & Donaldson, 2001, Senge, 2006, Sessa & London, 2006), little is known about continuous learning prompted by the interface between individuals, groups, and organizations. We begin by identifying parallel learning constructs and processes at the individual, group, and organizational levels, and then we briefly discuss a few theories that have addressed learning flow between these three levels. Finally, we analyze a case of an interorganizational project team encompassing subgroups from a number of different universities who are charged with making change within their institutions and sharing their learning at the project team level. While the original aim of the project was to impact student learning, the project team (and the organization housing the project team) soon learned that in order to do so, they also had to concentrate simultaneously on student (individual), faculty (group), and university (organizational) learning as well.
KW - Adaptive learning
KW - Experiential learning
KW - Generative learning
KW - Learning. readiness
KW - Service learning
KW - Student engagement
KW - Transformative learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923444531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390483.013.0065
DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390483.013.0065
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84923444531
SN - 9780195390483
BT - The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning
PB - Oxford University Press
ER -