Losing voice? Educational management organizations and charter schools' educational programs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Charter schools are one form of decentralizing public education by shifting power into the hands of school stakeholders by providing them with more "voice" in day-to-day decisions. However, the increasing involvement of educational management organizations (EMOs) as managers of charter schools raises new questions about the influence of school stakeholders. This exploratory study examines the experiences of three very different EMOs and two schools operated by each company. Specifically, the author describes the role of each company in the development of the educational programs in the schools it manages. The three companies varied in the extent to which they limited school stakeholder "voice." The analysis builds toward a greater understanding of the impact of EMOs on decentralization, including an exploration of the power of charter schools in the EMO-school relationship that examines how "exit" from the EMO-school relationship may provide power in a way that "voice" does not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-234
Number of pages31
JournalEducation and Urban Society
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2005

Fingerprint

school program
charter
educational program
management
school
school organization
stakeholder
programme
public education
decentralization
manager
education

Keywords

  • Charter schools
  • Decentralization
  • Privatization
  • School choice

Cite this

@article{e8d512e37b844d14912bde92ef799303,
title = "Losing voice? Educational management organizations and charter schools' educational programs",
abstract = "Charter schools are one form of decentralizing public education by shifting power into the hands of school stakeholders by providing them with more {"}voice{"} in day-to-day decisions. However, the increasing involvement of educational management organizations (EMOs) as managers of charter schools raises new questions about the influence of school stakeholders. This exploratory study examines the experiences of three very different EMOs and two schools operated by each company. Specifically, the author describes the role of each company in the development of the educational programs in the schools it manages. The three companies varied in the extent to which they limited school stakeholder {"}voice.{"} The analysis builds toward a greater understanding of the impact of EMOs on decentralization, including an exploration of the power of charter schools in the EMO-school relationship that examines how {"}exit{"} from the EMO-school relationship may provide power in a way that {"}voice{"} does not.",
keywords = "Charter schools, Decentralization, Privatization, School choice",
author = "Katrina Bulkley",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0013124504271984",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "204--234",
journal = "Education and Urban Society",
issn = "0013-1245",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Losing voice? Educational management organizations and charter schools' educational programs. / Bulkley, Katrina.

In: Education and Urban Society, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 204-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Losing voice? Educational management organizations and charter schools' educational programs

AU - Bulkley, Katrina

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Charter schools are one form of decentralizing public education by shifting power into the hands of school stakeholders by providing them with more "voice" in day-to-day decisions. However, the increasing involvement of educational management organizations (EMOs) as managers of charter schools raises new questions about the influence of school stakeholders. This exploratory study examines the experiences of three very different EMOs and two schools operated by each company. Specifically, the author describes the role of each company in the development of the educational programs in the schools it manages. The three companies varied in the extent to which they limited school stakeholder "voice." The analysis builds toward a greater understanding of the impact of EMOs on decentralization, including an exploration of the power of charter schools in the EMO-school relationship that examines how "exit" from the EMO-school relationship may provide power in a way that "voice" does not.

AB - Charter schools are one form of decentralizing public education by shifting power into the hands of school stakeholders by providing them with more "voice" in day-to-day decisions. However, the increasing involvement of educational management organizations (EMOs) as managers of charter schools raises new questions about the influence of school stakeholders. This exploratory study examines the experiences of three very different EMOs and two schools operated by each company. Specifically, the author describes the role of each company in the development of the educational programs in the schools it manages. The three companies varied in the extent to which they limited school stakeholder "voice." The analysis builds toward a greater understanding of the impact of EMOs on decentralization, including an exploration of the power of charter schools in the EMO-school relationship that examines how "exit" from the EMO-school relationship may provide power in a way that "voice" does not.

KW - Charter schools

KW - Decentralization

KW - Privatization

KW - School choice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13244277624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0013124504271984

DO - 10.1177/0013124504271984

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13244277624

VL - 37

SP - 204

EP - 234

JO - Education and Urban Society

JF - Education and Urban Society

SN - 0013-1245

IS - 2

ER -