Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics

Paul Bologna, Kenneth L. Heck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attached epiphytes often make important contributions to total primary production in seagrass meadows. Additionally, they may increase the spatial complexity of seagrass habitats. Experiments conducted using artificial seagrass units (ASU) manipulated both epiphytic structure and epiphytic food resources. Previous work suggested that the increase in faunal density associated with epiphytes was related to increases in structure, but our results indicate that the primary impact of epiphytes lies in their trophic role. Data showed that epifaunal density was significantly greater in conditioned ASUs fouled with a live community of epiphytes (12 285 individuals m-2) compared to ASUs with artificially created epiphytic structure (5099 inds. m-2) and to control ASUs (5955 inds. m-2). This response to epiphytic trophic resources was significant for most herbivore/omnivore taxa, but not necessarily for filter feeding or predatory epifauna. However, densities of two predatory taxa (fish and mud crabs) were significantly greater where epiphytic biomass was higher, which may reflect their response to increased prey abundance. Additionally, ASUs conditioned with live epiphytes had greater taxa richness than other ASUs. Epiphytic structure appeared to play only a limited role in determining the density of most mobile epifauna, but epiphytic structure appeared to be important in augmenting the settlement of bivalves. By using ASUs we were able to control aspects of blade length and shoot density, but the pre-experiment conditioning of treatments fouled with live epiphytes may have played a role in determining absolute differences in macrofaunal density among ASU treatments. Overall, our work suggests that the trophic role of epiphytes can have a dramatic impact on associated epifaunal communities, although future investigations are needed to assess this relationship more fully.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-39
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Volume242
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Sep 1999

Fingerprint

epiphytes
seagrass
epifauna
seagrass meadow
filter feeding
resource
omnivores
conditioning
primary production
bivalve
crab
herbivore
mud
shoot
meadows
experiment
primary productivity
Bivalvia
crabs
herbivores

Keywords

  • Artificial seagrass unit
  • Epifauna
  • Epiphyte
  • Gulf of Mexico
  • Seagrass
  • Thalassia testudinum

Cite this

@article{2a55dfc63ce9402596f15699c09b7f65,
title = "Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics",
abstract = "Attached epiphytes often make important contributions to total primary production in seagrass meadows. Additionally, they may increase the spatial complexity of seagrass habitats. Experiments conducted using artificial seagrass units (ASU) manipulated both epiphytic structure and epiphytic food resources. Previous work suggested that the increase in faunal density associated with epiphytes was related to increases in structure, but our results indicate that the primary impact of epiphytes lies in their trophic role. Data showed that epifaunal density was significantly greater in conditioned ASUs fouled with a live community of epiphytes (12 285 individuals m-2) compared to ASUs with artificially created epiphytic structure (5099 inds. m-2) and to control ASUs (5955 inds. m-2). This response to epiphytic trophic resources was significant for most herbivore/omnivore taxa, but not necessarily for filter feeding or predatory epifauna. However, densities of two predatory taxa (fish and mud crabs) were significantly greater where epiphytic biomass was higher, which may reflect their response to increased prey abundance. Additionally, ASUs conditioned with live epiphytes had greater taxa richness than other ASUs. Epiphytic structure appeared to play only a limited role in determining the density of most mobile epifauna, but epiphytic structure appeared to be important in augmenting the settlement of bivalves. By using ASUs we were able to control aspects of blade length and shoot density, but the pre-experiment conditioning of treatments fouled with live epiphytes may have played a role in determining absolute differences in macrofaunal density among ASU treatments. Overall, our work suggests that the trophic role of epiphytes can have a dramatic impact on associated epifaunal communities, although future investigations are needed to assess this relationship more fully.",
keywords = "Artificial seagrass unit, Epifauna, Epiphyte, Gulf of Mexico, Seagrass, Thalassia testudinum",
author = "Paul Bologna and Heck, {Kenneth L.}",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00092-1",
language = "English",
volume = "242",
pages = "21--39",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology",
issn = "0022-0981",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics. / Bologna, Paul; Heck, Kenneth L.

In: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 242, No. 1, 15.09.1999, p. 21-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics

AU - Bologna, Paul

AU - Heck, Kenneth L.

PY - 1999/9/15

Y1 - 1999/9/15

N2 - Attached epiphytes often make important contributions to total primary production in seagrass meadows. Additionally, they may increase the spatial complexity of seagrass habitats. Experiments conducted using artificial seagrass units (ASU) manipulated both epiphytic structure and epiphytic food resources. Previous work suggested that the increase in faunal density associated with epiphytes was related to increases in structure, but our results indicate that the primary impact of epiphytes lies in their trophic role. Data showed that epifaunal density was significantly greater in conditioned ASUs fouled with a live community of epiphytes (12 285 individuals m-2) compared to ASUs with artificially created epiphytic structure (5099 inds. m-2) and to control ASUs (5955 inds. m-2). This response to epiphytic trophic resources was significant for most herbivore/omnivore taxa, but not necessarily for filter feeding or predatory epifauna. However, densities of two predatory taxa (fish and mud crabs) were significantly greater where epiphytic biomass was higher, which may reflect their response to increased prey abundance. Additionally, ASUs conditioned with live epiphytes had greater taxa richness than other ASUs. Epiphytic structure appeared to play only a limited role in determining the density of most mobile epifauna, but epiphytic structure appeared to be important in augmenting the settlement of bivalves. By using ASUs we were able to control aspects of blade length and shoot density, but the pre-experiment conditioning of treatments fouled with live epiphytes may have played a role in determining absolute differences in macrofaunal density among ASU treatments. Overall, our work suggests that the trophic role of epiphytes can have a dramatic impact on associated epifaunal communities, although future investigations are needed to assess this relationship more fully.

AB - Attached epiphytes often make important contributions to total primary production in seagrass meadows. Additionally, they may increase the spatial complexity of seagrass habitats. Experiments conducted using artificial seagrass units (ASU) manipulated both epiphytic structure and epiphytic food resources. Previous work suggested that the increase in faunal density associated with epiphytes was related to increases in structure, but our results indicate that the primary impact of epiphytes lies in their trophic role. Data showed that epifaunal density was significantly greater in conditioned ASUs fouled with a live community of epiphytes (12 285 individuals m-2) compared to ASUs with artificially created epiphytic structure (5099 inds. m-2) and to control ASUs (5955 inds. m-2). This response to epiphytic trophic resources was significant for most herbivore/omnivore taxa, but not necessarily for filter feeding or predatory epifauna. However, densities of two predatory taxa (fish and mud crabs) were significantly greater where epiphytic biomass was higher, which may reflect their response to increased prey abundance. Additionally, ASUs conditioned with live epiphytes had greater taxa richness than other ASUs. Epiphytic structure appeared to play only a limited role in determining the density of most mobile epifauna, but epiphytic structure appeared to be important in augmenting the settlement of bivalves. By using ASUs we were able to control aspects of blade length and shoot density, but the pre-experiment conditioning of treatments fouled with live epiphytes may have played a role in determining absolute differences in macrofaunal density among ASU treatments. Overall, our work suggests that the trophic role of epiphytes can have a dramatic impact on associated epifaunal communities, although future investigations are needed to assess this relationship more fully.

KW - Artificial seagrass unit

KW - Epifauna

KW - Epiphyte

KW - Gulf of Mexico

KW - Seagrass

KW - Thalassia testudinum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033568087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00092-1

DO - 10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00092-1

M3 - Article

VL - 242

SP - 21

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

JF - Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

SN - 0022-0981

IS - 1

ER -