Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation

Tarika Daftary Kapur, Jennifer L. Groscup, Maureen O'Connor, Frank Coffaro, Michele Galietta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the influence of social conformity and prejudice, defendants pleading not guilty by reason of insanity face the significant challenges of securing fair and impartial juries. Attitudes and knowledge of the insanity defense are factors that may influence levels of impartiality. In the light of this, we set out to develop a scale to examine knowledge levels of the insanity defense and their influence on decision-making. Two studies were conducted to construct a scale designed to assess laypersons' knowledge of the insanity defense. Items measuring knowledge of the insanity defense were based on Perlin's (1995) insanity defense myths. The first study identified particular items in need of revision and subscales that required the development of additional items in order to improve reliability and construct validity in the second study. The second study used the revised scale, demonstrating improved validity and reliability. The scale also had acceptable predictive validity with reference to insanity defense verdicts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-63
Number of pages24
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Insanity Defense
scale construction
Reproducibility of Results
Social Conformity
layperson
level of knowledge
construct validity
conformity
prejudice
myth
Decision Making
decision making

Cite this

Daftary Kapur, Tarika ; Groscup, Jennifer L. ; O'Connor, Maureen ; Coffaro, Frank ; Galietta, Michele. / Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense : Scale construction and validation. In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 40-63.
@article{7d236d53f4174c2284d3d43b7e61cf9a,
title = "Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation",
abstract = "Given the influence of social conformity and prejudice, defendants pleading not guilty by reason of insanity face the significant challenges of securing fair and impartial juries. Attitudes and knowledge of the insanity defense are factors that may influence levels of impartiality. In the light of this, we set out to develop a scale to examine knowledge levels of the insanity defense and their influence on decision-making. Two studies were conducted to construct a scale designed to assess laypersons' knowledge of the insanity defense. Items measuring knowledge of the insanity defense were based on Perlin's (1995) insanity defense myths. The first study identified particular items in need of revision and subscales that required the development of additional items in order to improve reliability and construct validity in the second study. The second study used the revised scale, demonstrating improved validity and reliability. The scale also had acceptable predictive validity with reference to insanity defense verdicts.",
author = "{Daftary Kapur}, Tarika and Groscup, {Jennifer L.} and Maureen O'Connor and Frank Coffaro and Michele Galietta",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.938",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "40--63",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense : Scale construction and validation. / Daftary Kapur, Tarika; Groscup, Jennifer L.; O'Connor, Maureen; Coffaro, Frank; Galietta, Michele.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 40-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense

T2 - Scale construction and validation

AU - Daftary Kapur, Tarika

AU - Groscup, Jennifer L.

AU - O'Connor, Maureen

AU - Coffaro, Frank

AU - Galietta, Michele

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Given the influence of social conformity and prejudice, defendants pleading not guilty by reason of insanity face the significant challenges of securing fair and impartial juries. Attitudes and knowledge of the insanity defense are factors that may influence levels of impartiality. In the light of this, we set out to develop a scale to examine knowledge levels of the insanity defense and their influence on decision-making. Two studies were conducted to construct a scale designed to assess laypersons' knowledge of the insanity defense. Items measuring knowledge of the insanity defense were based on Perlin's (1995) insanity defense myths. The first study identified particular items in need of revision and subscales that required the development of additional items in order to improve reliability and construct validity in the second study. The second study used the revised scale, demonstrating improved validity and reliability. The scale also had acceptable predictive validity with reference to insanity defense verdicts.

AB - Given the influence of social conformity and prejudice, defendants pleading not guilty by reason of insanity face the significant challenges of securing fair and impartial juries. Attitudes and knowledge of the insanity defense are factors that may influence levels of impartiality. In the light of this, we set out to develop a scale to examine knowledge levels of the insanity defense and their influence on decision-making. Two studies were conducted to construct a scale designed to assess laypersons' knowledge of the insanity defense. Items measuring knowledge of the insanity defense were based on Perlin's (1995) insanity defense myths. The first study identified particular items in need of revision and subscales that required the development of additional items in order to improve reliability and construct validity in the second study. The second study used the revised scale, demonstrating improved validity and reliability. The scale also had acceptable predictive validity with reference to insanity defense verdicts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78851472461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.938

DO - 10.1002/bsl.938

M3 - Article

C2 - 21264924

AN - SCOPUS:78851472461

VL - 29

SP - 40

EP - 63

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 1

ER -