Misconceptions about "misconceptions"

Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There remains a lack of agreement in the field of science education as to whether student "misconceptions" ought to be considered obstacles or resources, and this has implications for the ways in which prospective teachers think about the value of their students' ideas. This empirical study examines how 14 preservice secondary science teachers in four different science teacher preparation programs interpreted the rationale for eliciting student ideas. The findings indicate that the preservice teachers in this study showed an increase in recognizing the importance of student ideas, yet not all took the same view of their role and value in teaching, which appeared to be closely connected to beliefs about how learning takes place. Five different orientations to student ideas are described in the findings. These include viewing student ideas as evidence of content coverage, as obstacles to understanding, as tools to prime students thinking, interest, and activity, as elements of a positive classroom environment, and as the raw material of learning. The findings suggest that science teacher educators help focus preservice teachers' attention on student thinking and help them learn to incorporate their students' ideas into their instruction in ways that build upon those ideas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)927-959
Number of pages33
JournalScience Education
Volume96
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

teacher
science
Values
student
Misconceptions
raw materials
learning
coverage
educator
instruction
classroom
lack
Teaching
resources
evidence
education
Pre-service Teachers

Cite this

@article{d9280ffb7865488f9d6ce870a36dae88,
title = "Misconceptions about {"}misconceptions{"}: Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas",
abstract = "There remains a lack of agreement in the field of science education as to whether student {"}misconceptions{"} ought to be considered obstacles or resources, and this has implications for the ways in which prospective teachers think about the value of their students' ideas. This empirical study examines how 14 preservice secondary science teachers in four different science teacher preparation programs interpreted the rationale for eliciting student ideas. The findings indicate that the preservice teachers in this study showed an increase in recognizing the importance of student ideas, yet not all took the same view of their role and value in teaching, which appeared to be closely connected to beliefs about how learning takes place. Five different orientations to student ideas are described in the findings. These include viewing student ideas as evidence of content coverage, as obstacles to understanding, as tools to prime students thinking, interest, and activity, as elements of a positive classroom environment, and as the raw material of learning. The findings suggest that science teacher educators help focus preservice teachers' attention on student thinking and help them learn to incorporate their students' ideas into their instruction in ways that build upon those ideas.",
author = "Douglas Larkin",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sce.21022",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "927--959",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Misconceptions about "misconceptions" : Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas. / Larkin, Douglas.

In: Science Education, Vol. 96, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 927-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misconceptions about "misconceptions"

T2 - Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas

AU - Larkin, Douglas

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - There remains a lack of agreement in the field of science education as to whether student "misconceptions" ought to be considered obstacles or resources, and this has implications for the ways in which prospective teachers think about the value of their students' ideas. This empirical study examines how 14 preservice secondary science teachers in four different science teacher preparation programs interpreted the rationale for eliciting student ideas. The findings indicate that the preservice teachers in this study showed an increase in recognizing the importance of student ideas, yet not all took the same view of their role and value in teaching, which appeared to be closely connected to beliefs about how learning takes place. Five different orientations to student ideas are described in the findings. These include viewing student ideas as evidence of content coverage, as obstacles to understanding, as tools to prime students thinking, interest, and activity, as elements of a positive classroom environment, and as the raw material of learning. The findings suggest that science teacher educators help focus preservice teachers' attention on student thinking and help them learn to incorporate their students' ideas into their instruction in ways that build upon those ideas.

AB - There remains a lack of agreement in the field of science education as to whether student "misconceptions" ought to be considered obstacles or resources, and this has implications for the ways in which prospective teachers think about the value of their students' ideas. This empirical study examines how 14 preservice secondary science teachers in four different science teacher preparation programs interpreted the rationale for eliciting student ideas. The findings indicate that the preservice teachers in this study showed an increase in recognizing the importance of student ideas, yet not all took the same view of their role and value in teaching, which appeared to be closely connected to beliefs about how learning takes place. Five different orientations to student ideas are described in the findings. These include viewing student ideas as evidence of content coverage, as obstacles to understanding, as tools to prime students thinking, interest, and activity, as elements of a positive classroom environment, and as the raw material of learning. The findings suggest that science teacher educators help focus preservice teachers' attention on student thinking and help them learn to incorporate their students' ideas into their instruction in ways that build upon those ideas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865102131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.21022

DO - 10.1002/sce.21022

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 927

EP - 959

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

IS - 5

ER -