TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)
T2 - Phase I: Segmentation
AU - Berg, Philipp
AU - Voß, Samuel
AU - Saalfeld, Sylvia
AU - Janiga, Gábor
AU - Bergersen, Aslak W.
AU - Valen-Sendstad, Kristian
AU - Bruening, Jan
AU - Goubergrits, Leonid
AU - Spuler, Andreas
AU - Cancelliere, Nicole M.
AU - Steinman, David A.
AU - Pereira, Vitor M.
AU - Chiu, Tin Lok
AU - Tsang, Anderson Chun On
AU - Chung, Bong Jae
AU - Cebral, Juan R.
AU - Cito, Salvatore
AU - Pallarès, Jordi
AU - Copelli, Gabriele
AU - Csippa, Benjamin
AU - Paál, György
AU - Fujimura, Soichiro
AU - Takao, Hiroyuki
AU - Hodis, Simona
AU - Hille, Georg
AU - Karmonik, Christof
AU - Elias, Saba
AU - Kellermann, Kerstin
AU - Khan, Muhammad Owais
AU - Marsden, Alison L.
AU - Morales, Hernán G.
AU - Piskin, Senol
AU - Finol, Ender A.
AU - Pravdivtseva, Mariya
AU - Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Hamidreza
AU - Paliwal, Nikhil
AU - Meng, Hui
AU - Seshadhri, Santhosh
AU - Howard, Matthew
AU - Shojima, Masaaki
AU - Sugiyama, Shin ichiro
AU - Niizuma, Kuniyasu
AU - Sindeev, Sergey
AU - Frolov, Sergey
AU - Wagner, Thomas
AU - Brawanski, Alexander
AU - Qian, Yi
AU - Wu, Yu An
AU - Carlson, Kent D.
AU - Dragomir-Daescu, Dan
AU - Beuing, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Biomedical Engineering Society.
PY - 2018/12/15
Y1 - 2018/12/15
N2 - Purpose: Advanced morphology analysis and image-based hemodynamic simulations are increasingly used to assess the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the accuracy of those results strongly depends on the quality of the vessel wall segmentation. Methods: To evaluate state-of-the-art segmentation approaches, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) was announced. Participants carried out segmentation in three anonymized 3D DSA datasets (left and right anterior, posterior circulation) of a patient harboring five IAs. Qualitative and quantitative inter-group comparisons were carried out with respect to aneurysm volumes and ostia. Further, over- and undersegmentation were evaluated based on highly resolved 2D images. Finally, clinically relevant morphological parameters were calculated. Results: Based on the contributions of 26 participating groups, the findings reveal that no consensus regarding segmentation software or underlying algorithms exists. Qualitative similarity of the aneurysm representations was obtained. However, inter-group differences occurred regarding the luminal surface quality, number of vessel branches considered, aneurysm volumes (up to 20%) and ostium surface areas (up to 30%). Further, a systematic oversegmentation of the 3D surfaces was observed with a difference of approximately 10% to the highly resolved 2D reference image. Particularly, the neck of the ruptured aneurysm was overrepresented by all groups except for one. Finally, morphology parameters (e.g., undulation and non-sphericity) varied up to 25%. Conclusions: MATCH provides an overview of segmentation methodologies for IAs and highlights the variability of surface reconstruction. Further, the study emphasizes the need for careful processing of initial segmentation results for a realistic assessment of clinically relevant morphological parameters.
AB - Purpose: Advanced morphology analysis and image-based hemodynamic simulations are increasingly used to assess the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the accuracy of those results strongly depends on the quality of the vessel wall segmentation. Methods: To evaluate state-of-the-art segmentation approaches, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) was announced. Participants carried out segmentation in three anonymized 3D DSA datasets (left and right anterior, posterior circulation) of a patient harboring five IAs. Qualitative and quantitative inter-group comparisons were carried out with respect to aneurysm volumes and ostia. Further, over- and undersegmentation were evaluated based on highly resolved 2D images. Finally, clinically relevant morphological parameters were calculated. Results: Based on the contributions of 26 participating groups, the findings reveal that no consensus regarding segmentation software or underlying algorithms exists. Qualitative similarity of the aneurysm representations was obtained. However, inter-group differences occurred regarding the luminal surface quality, number of vessel branches considered, aneurysm volumes (up to 20%) and ostium surface areas (up to 30%). Further, a systematic oversegmentation of the 3D surfaces was observed with a difference of approximately 10% to the highly resolved 2D reference image. Particularly, the neck of the ruptured aneurysm was overrepresented by all groups except for one. Finally, morphology parameters (e.g., undulation and non-sphericity) varied up to 25%. Conclusions: MATCH provides an overview of segmentation methodologies for IAs and highlights the variability of surface reconstruction. Further, the study emphasizes the need for careful processing of initial segmentation results for a realistic assessment of clinically relevant morphological parameters.
KW - Challenge
KW - Intracranial aneurysm
KW - Morphology
KW - Segmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057759305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13239-018-00376-0
DO - 10.1007/s13239-018-00376-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30191538
AN - SCOPUS:85057759305
SN - 1869-408X
VL - 9
SP - 565
EP - 581
JO - Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
JF - Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
IS - 4
ER -